Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae)

New Phytologist

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 235-252

  Pérez, Rocío ^a   Vargas, Pablo ^b   Arroyo, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chloroplast sequences; Evolutionary convergence; Heterostyly; Mediterranean; Morphometry; Phylogeny; Plant pollinator interactions

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; FLORAL TRAIT; MORPHOMETRY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLYMORPHISM;

AMARYLLIDACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; NARCISSUS; NARCISSUS PALLIDULUS;

EID: 0347388383     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00955.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, Nute H. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 89: 37-49.
2. Arroyo J. 2002. Narcissus, la evolución de los polimorfismos florales y la conservación más allá de las 'listas rojas'. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75: 39-55.
3. Arroyo J, Barrett SCH. 2000. Discovery of distyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 748-751.
4. Arroyo J, Barrett SCH, Hidalgo R, Cole WW. 2002. Evolutionary maintenance of stygma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyracens (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1242-1249.
5. Arroyo J, Dafni A. 1995. Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytologist 129: 135-146.
6. Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000a. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios. Heredity 84: 502-513.
7. Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000b. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84: 514-524.
8. Barrett SCH. 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
9. Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Arroyo J, Cruzan MB, Lloyd DG. 1997. Sexual polymorphism in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): Is this species tristylous?. Heredity 78: 135-145.
10. Barrett SCH, Jesson LK, Baker AM. 2000. The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 85: 253-265.
11. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds. Floral biology, studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 339-376.
12. Batra SWT. 1994. Anthophora pilipes villosula SM (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae), a manageable japanese bee that visits bluberries and apples during cool, rainy spring weather. Proceeding of the Entomological Society of Washington 96: 98-119.
13. Blanchard JW. 1990. Narcissus, a guide to wild daffodils. Surrey, UK: Alpine Garden Society.
14. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. American Naturalist 114: 467-498.
15. Darwin C. 1877. The Different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London, UK: John Murray.
16. Dorda E, Fernández-Casas J. 1989. Estudios morfológicos en el género Narcissus L. Anatomía de hoja y escapo III. Fontqueria 27: 103-162.
17. Dulberger R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution 18: 361-363.
18. Dulberger R. 1992. Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 41-84.
19. Faivre AE. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from herkogamous ancestor. Evolution 54: 847-858.
20. Faivre AE, McDade LA. 2001. Population level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly? American Journal of Botany 188: 841-853.
21. Fernandes A. 1967. Contribution à la connaisance de la biosystematique de quelques espècies de genre Narcissus. Portugaliae Acta Biologica (B) 9: 1-44.
22. Fernandes A. 1975. L'Evolution chez le genre Narcissus L. Anales del Instituto Botánico Cavanilles 32: 843-872.
23. Ganders FR. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635.
24. Goldblatt P, Bernhardt P, Manning JC. 2000. Adaptative radiation of pollination mechanisms in Ixia (Iridaceae: Crocoideae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 564-577.
25. Graham SW, Barrett SCH. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: Implications for breeding-system evolution. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 415-451.
26. Guitián J, Guitián P, Medrano M. 1998. Floral biology of the distylous Mediterranean shrub Jasminum fruticans (Oleaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 18: 195-201.
27. James FC, McCulloch CE. 1990. Multivariate-analysis in ecology and systematics - Panacea or Pandora Box. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 129-166.
28. Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
29. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 11-120.
30. Kohn JR, Barrett SCH. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46: 43-55.
31. Kohn JR, Graham SW, Morton B, Doyle JJ, Barrett SCH. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50: 1454-1469.
32. Lau P, Bosque C. 2003. Pollen flow in the distylous Palicourea fendleri (Rubiaceae): an experimental test of the disassortative pollen flow hypothesis. Oecologia 135: 593-600.
33. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 151-178.
34. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 179-207.
35. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ, Dulberger R. 1990. Heterostyly in species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), Hugonia (Linaceae) and other disputed cases. Plant Systematics and Evolution 172: 215-227.
36. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade, Version 3: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
37. Mathew B. 2002. Clasification of the genus Narcissus. In: Hanks GR, ed. Narcissus and Daffodil. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 30-52.
38. McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA: MjM Software Design.
39. Meerow AW, Fay MF, Guy CL, Li Q-B, Zaman FQ, Chase M. 1999. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F sequence data. American Journal of Botany 86: 1325-1345.
40. Miller JS, Venable DL. 2003. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 57: 74-86.
41. Muller-Doblies D, Muller-Doblies U. 1989. Narcissus albimarginatus, plate 1986. In: The flowering plants of Africa, Vol. 50 Part 2. Cape Town, South Africa: Creda Press.
42. Nishihiro J, Washitani I, Thomson JD, Thomson BA. 2000. Patterns and consequences of stigma height variation in a natural population of distylous plant, Primula sieboldii. Functional Ecology 14: 502-512.
43. Ornduff R. 1992. Historical perspective on heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 31-39.
44. Philippi TE. 1993. Multiple regression: Herbivory. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 183-210.
45. Richards AJ. 1998. Lethal linkage and its role in the evolution of plant breeding systems. In: Owens SJ, Rudall PJ, eds. Reproductive biology. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
46. Richards JH, Barrett SCH. 1992. The development of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 85-124.
47. Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH. 1999. Differential ovule development following self-and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855-870.
48. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The Neighbor-Joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogentic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4: 406-425.
49. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as character in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Freeman.
51. StatSoft. 1997. STATISTICA for Windows, Version 5.1. Tulsa, OK, USA: StatSoft Inc.
52. Stone GN. 1994. Patterns of evolution of warm-up rates and body temperatures in flight in solitary bees of the genus Anthophora. Functional Ecology 8: 324-335.
53. Stone JL. 1996. Components of pollination effectiveness in Psychotria surrensis, a tropical distylous shrub. Oecologia 107: 504-512.
54. Stone JL, Thomson JD. 1994. The evolution of distyly: pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48: 1595-1606.
55. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 4.0. Champaign, IL, USA: Illinois Natural History Survey.
56. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of choroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
57. Thompson JD, Barrett SCH, Baker AM. 2003. Frequency-dependent variation in reproductive success in Narcissus: implications for the maintance of stigma-height dimorphism. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 270: 949-953.
58. Worley AC, Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000. Floral display in Narcissus: variation in flower size and number at the species, population, and individual levels. International Journal of Plant Science 161: 69-79.