Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1007-1021

  Graham, Sean W ^a   Barrett, Spencer C H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ancestral state reconstructions; Concentrated changes test (CCT); Floral evolution; Heterostyly; Narcissus; ndF; Pollination biology; Stigma height dimorphism; Stylar polymorphism; trnL trnF

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FLORAL TRAIT; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; POLYMORPHISM;

AMARYLLIDACEAE; NARCISSUS; NARCISSUS ALBIMARGINATUS; NARCISSUS TRIANDRUS;

EID: 8144221094     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: 00029122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.7.1007     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. ARBER, A. 1937. Studies in flower structure. III. On the 'corona' and androecium in certain Amaryllidaceae. Annals of Botany 1: 293-304.
2. ARMBRUSTER, W. S. 1993. Evolution of plant pollination systems: hypotheses and tests with a neotropical vine Dalechampia. Evolution 47: 1480-1505.
3. ARROYO, J., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2000. Discovery of distyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 748-751.
4. ARROYO, J., S. C. H. BARRETT, R. HIDALGO, AND W. W. COLE. 2002. Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1242-1249.
5. ARROYO, J., AND A. DAFNI. 1995. Variation in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytologist 129: 135-145.
6. BAKER, A. M., S. C. H. BARRETT, AND J. D. THOMPSON. 2000a. Variation in pollen limitation in the early flowering Mediterranean geophyte Narcissus assoanus (Amaryllidaceae). Oecologia 124: 529-535.
7. BAKER, A. M., J. D. THOMPSON, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2000b. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus: II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84: 514-524.
8. BAKER, A. M., J. D. THOMPSON, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2000c. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus: I. Floral variation and style morph ratios. Heredity 84: 502-513.
9. BARRETT, S. C. H. [ED.]. 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
10. BARRETT, S. C. H. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. In D. Futuyma and J. Antonovics [eds.], Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, 283-326, vol. 9. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
11. BARRETT, S. C. H., W. W. COLE, J. ARROYO, M. B. CRUZAN, AND D. G. LLOYD. 1997. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus: is this species tristylous? Heredity 78: 135-145.
12. BARRETT, S. C. H., W. W. COLE, AND D. H. WILKEN. 2000a. Heterostyly in the Lamiaceae: the case of Salvia brandegeei. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 211-219.
13. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND M. B. CRUZAN. 1994. Incompatibility in heterostylous species. In E. G. Williams, A. E. Clarke, and R. B. Knox [eds.], Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants, 189-219. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
14. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND S. W. GRAHAM. 1997. Adaptive radiation in the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae: insights from phylogenetic analysis. In T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma [eds.], Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation, 225-258. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. D. HARDER, AND W. W. COLE. 2004. Correlated evolution of floral morphology and mating-type frequencies in a sexually polymorphic plant. Evolution 58: 964-975.
16. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. K. JESSON, AND A. M. BAKER. 2000b. The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 85(supplement A): 253-265.
17. BARRETT, S. C. H., D. G. LLOYD, AND J. ARROYO. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.], Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, 339-376. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
18. BARRETT, S. C. H., M. T. MORGAN, AND B. C. HUSBAND. 1989. The dissolution of a complex polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43: 1398-1416.
19. BATEMAN, A. J. 1968. The role of heterostyly in Narcissus and Mirabilis. Evolution 22: 645-646.
20. BLANCHARD, J. W. 1990. Narcissus: a guide to wild daffodils. Alpine Garden Society, Surrey, UK.
21. BREMER, B., AND J. F. MANEN. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 225: 43-72.
22. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution 33: 486-498.
23. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. American Naturalist 114: 467-498.
24. COCHRANE, S. A., AND A. G. DAY. 1994. A heterostylous Gilia (Polemoniaceae) from central Nevada. Madroño 41: 120-127.
25. DAHLGREN, R. M. T., H. T. CLIFFORD, AND P. F. YEO. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution, and taxonomy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
26. DARWIN, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London, UK.
27. DODSON, H. E. M., J. ARROYO, G. BERGSTRÖM, AND I. GROTH. 1997. Interspecific variation in floral fragrances within the genus Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 25: 685-706.
28. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
29. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
30. DULBERGER, R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution 18: 361-363.
31. DULBERGER, R. 1967. Pollination systems in plants in Israel. Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
32. ECKERT, C. G., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1992. Stochastic loss of style morphs from populations of tristylous Lythrum salicaria and Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Evolution 46: 1014-1029.
33. ECKERT, C. G., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1995. Style morph ratios in tristylous Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): selection vs. historical contingency. Ecology 76: 1051-1066.
34. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
35. FERNANDES, A. 1935. Remarque sur l'hétérostylie de Narcissus triandrus L. et de N. reflexus Brot. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana (série 2) 10: 278-288.
36. FERNANDES, A. 1937. Sur l'origine du Narcissus dubius Gouan. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana (série 2) 12: 93-118.
37. FERNANDES, A. 1940. Sur la position systématique et l'origine de Narcissus broussonetii Lag. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana (série 2) 14: 53-66.
38. FERNANDES, A. 1951. Sur la phylogénie des espèces du genre Narcissus L. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana (série 2) 25: 113-190.
39. FERNANDES, A. 1967. Contribution à la connaissance de la biosystématique de quelques espèces du genre Narcissus L. Portugaliae Acta Biologica, serie B. Sistematica, Ecologia, Biogeografia e Paleontologia 9: 1-44.
40. FERNANDES, A. 1968a. Keys to the identification of native and naturalized taxa of the genus Narcissus L. Daffodil and Tulip Year Book 33: 37-66.
41. FERNANDES, A. 1968b. Improvements in the classification of the genus Narcissus L. Plant Life 24: 51-57.
42. FERNANDES, A. 1975. L'évolution chez le genre Narcissus L. Anales Instituto Botanico A. J. Cavanilles 32: 843-872.
43. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
44. FLAGG, R. O., AND W. S. FLORY. 1962. Cytological reports and the placement of Sternbergia. Plant Life 18: 44-45.
45. FRUMHOFF, P. C., AND H. K. REEVE. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48: 172-180.
46. GANDERS, F. R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635.
47. GRAHAM, S. W., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: implications for breeding-system evolution. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, 415-441. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
48. GRAHAM, S. W., J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology 47: 545-567.
49. GRAHAM, S.W., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1712-1730.
50. GRAHAM, S. W., P. A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S83-S96.
51. GRANT, V., AND K. A. GRANT. 1965. Flower pollination in the phlox family. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
52. HANKS, G. R. 2002. Commercial production of Narcissus bulbs. In G. R. Hanks [ed.], Narcissus and daffodil: the genus Narcissus, 53-130. Taylor and Francis, New York, New York, USA.
53. HARTIGAN, J. A. 1973. Minimum mutation fits to a given tree. Biometrics 29: 53-65.
54. HENRIQUES, J. A. 1887. Observacoes sobre algumas especies de Narcissus encontrados em Portugal. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 5: 168-174.
55. HERRERA, C. M. 1995. Floral biology, microclimate, and pollination by ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. Ecology 76: 218-228.
56. JEFFERSON-BROWN, M. 1991. Narcissus. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
57. JOHNSTON, S. D., H. P. LINDER, AND K. E. STEINER. 1998. Phylogeny and radiation of pollination systems in Disa (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 402-411.
58. KOHN, J. R., S. W. GRAHAM, B. MORTON, J. J. DOYLE, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast restriction-site variation. Evolution 50: 1454-1469.
59. LLOYD, D. G., AND C. J. WEBB. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In S. C. H. Barrett [ed.], Evolution and function of heterostyly, 151-178. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
60. LLOYD, D. G., AND C. J. WEBB. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In S. C. H. Barrett [ed.], Evolution and function of heterostyly, 179-207. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
61. LLOYD, D. G., C. J. WEBB, AND R. DULBERGER. 1990. Heterostyly in species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) and Hugonia (Linaceae) and other disputed cases. Plant Systematics and Evolution 172: 215-227.
62. LORCH, P. D., AND J. M. EADIE. 1999. Power of the concentrated change test for correlated evolution. Systematic Biology 48: 170-191.
63. MADDISON, W. P. 1989. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics 5: 365-377.
64. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44: 539-557.
65. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 2001. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
66. MAST, A. R., S. KELSO, A. J. RICHARDS, D. J. LANG, D. M. S. FELLER, AND E. CONTI. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in Primula L. and related genera (Primulaceae) based on noncoding chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1381-1400.
67. MATHEW, B. 2002. Classification of the genus Narcissus. In G. R. Hanks [ed.], Narcissus and daffodil: the genus Narcissus, 30-52. Taylor and Francis, New York, New York, USA.
68. MEEROW, A. W., M. F. FAY, C. L. GUY, Q.-B. LI, F. Q. ZAMAN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F sequence data. American Journal of Botany 86: 1325-1345.
69. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
70. ORNDUFF, R. 1972. The breakdown of trimorphic incompatibility in Oxalis section Corniculatae. Evolution 26: 52-65.
71. PERÉZ, R., P. VARGAS, AND J. ARROYO. 2003. Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). New Phytologist 161: 235-252.
72. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
73. RICHARDS, A. J. 1997. Plant breeding systems, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
74. ROMERO, A. T., P. M. SÁNCHEZ CASTILLO, AND M. RUIZ REJÓN. 1983. Sobre cariología, morfología y corología de Narcissus tortifolius Fernández Casas. Fontqueria 4: 7-10.
75. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Biometrics 19: 1572-1574.
76. SAGE, T. L., F. STRUMAS, W. W. COLE, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1999. Differential ovule development following self- and cross-fertilization: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855-870.
77. SCHEMSKE, D. W., AND H. D. BRADSHAW, JR. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 11910-11915.
78. SCHOEN, D. J., M. O. JOHNSTON, A.-M. HEUREUX, AND J. V. MARSOLAIS. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51: 1090-1099.
79. SINGH, V. 1972. Floral morphology of the Amaryllidaceae. I. Subfamily Amaryllidioideae. Canadian Journal of Botany 50: 1555-1565.
80. STONE, J. L., AND J. D. THOMSON. 1994. The evolution of distyly: pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48: 1595-1606.
81. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Computer program and documentation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
82. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND W. P. MADDISON. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Mathematical Biosciences 87: 199-229.
83. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
84. THOMPSON, J. D., S. C. H. BARRETT, AND A. M. BAKER. 2003. Frequency-dependent variation in reproductive success in Narcissus: implications for the maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, series B 270: 949-953.
85. THOMPSON, J. D., T. PAILLER, D. STRASBERG, AND D. MANICACCI. 1996. Tristyly in the endangered Mascarene Island endemic Hugonia serrata (Linaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 1160-1167.
86. VOGEL, S., AND D. MÜLLER-DOBLIES. 1975. Eine nachtblütige Herbst-Narzisse. Zwiebelbau und Blütenökologie von Narcissus viridiflorus Schousboe. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 96: 427-447.
87. WEBB, D. A. 1980. Amaryllidaceae. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, D. A. Webb, A. O. Chater, and I. B. K. Richardson [eds.], Flora Europaea, 75-84, vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
88. WEBB, C. J., AND D. G. LLOYD. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 163-178.
89. WELLER, S. G. 1976. Breeding system polymorphism in a heterostylous species. Evolution 30: 442-454.
90. WELLER, S. G. 1992. Evolutionary modifications of tristylous systems. In S. C. H. Barrett [ed.], Evolution and function of heterostyly, 247-272. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
91. WELLS, J. S. 1989. Modern miniature daffodils: species and hybrids. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
92. WORLEY, A. C., A. M. BAKER, J. D. THOMPSON, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2000. Floral display in Narcissus: variation in flower size and number at the species, population, and individual levels. International Journal of Plant Science 161: 69-79.