The emerging role of breast tomosynthesis

Breast Cancer

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 204-212

  Uematsu, Takayoshi ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ARTIFACT; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84880041134     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-013-0456-4     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Ziedes des Plantes B.G.: Eine Neue Methode Zur Diffenzierung in der Rontgenographie (Planigraphie) (in German). Acta Radiol. 1932;13:182-92.
2. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. 1997;205:399-406. (Pubitemid 27467317)
3. Rafferty EA. Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:831-43. (Pubitemid 47411641)
4. Feng SS, Sechopoulos I. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. Radiology. 2012;263:35-42.
5. Olgar T, Kahn T, Gosch D. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Rofo. 2012;184:911-8.
6. Ren B, Ruth C, Wu T, et al. A new generation FFDM/tomosynthesis fusion system with selenium detector. Proc SPIE. 2010;7622:76211B-20B.
7. Machida H, Yuhara T, Mori T, Ueno E, Moribe Y, Sabol JM. Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis. Radiographics. 2010;30:549-62.
8. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
9. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson AR, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology. 1996;199:811-7. (Pubitemid 26157489)
10. Rangayyan RM, Banik S, Desautels JE. Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23:611-31.
11. Nemoto M, Honmura S, Shimizu A, Furukawa D, Kobatake H, Nawano S. A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009;4:27-36.
12. Biswas SK, Mukherjee DP. Recognizing architectural distortion in mammogram: a multiscale texture modeling approach with GMM. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:2023-30.
13. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA, et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:16-24.
14. Uematsu T, Kasami M. MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:395-404.
15. Uematsu T, Kasami M. MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 2. Cystic circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:405-9.
16. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2817-25.
17. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:320-4.
18. Kopans D, Gavenonis S, Halpern E, Moore R. Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J. 2011;17:638-44.
19. Timberg P, Båth M, Andersson I, Mattsson S, Tingberg A, Ruschin M. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Med Phys. 2010;37:5618-26.
20. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:616-23. (Pubitemid 47328544)
21. Zhou J, Zhao B, Zhao W. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. Med Phys. 2007;34:1098-109. (Pubitemid 46355644)
22. Wallis MG, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology. 2012;262:788-96.
23. Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):e1074-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/53282892.
24. Saunders RS Jr, Samei E, Lo JY, Baker JA. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2009;251:673-82.
25. Förnvik D, Andersson I, Svahn T, Timberg P, Zackrisson S, Tingberg A. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;139:118-23.
26. Tagliafico A, Astengo D, Cavagnetto F, et al. One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:539-44.
27. Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D. Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W172-6.
28. Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:166-71.
29. Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:976-81.
30. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168-75. (Pubitemid 36231622)