The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 629-639

  Barreto, Manuela ^a   Ellemers, Naomi ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534068     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202288007     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
3. Barreto, M., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Shahinper, K. (2001). The influence of linguistic context on the expression of social identity among minority group members: Evidence for strategic self-presentation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation: Understanding individuals moving between cultures. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 14). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Bourhis, R. Y., Moise, L. C., Perreault, S., & Senecal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.
6. Branscombe, N., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Brauer, M., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Defining variables in relationships to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 410-423.
8. Breakwell, M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. New York: Methuen.
9. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
10. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into con text: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
11. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
12. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
13. Eagly, A. M., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
14. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
15. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
16. Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and strategic responses to social context. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 146-157). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk.J. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
18. Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N. K., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
19. Finchilescu, G. (1986). Effect of incompatibility between internal and external group membership criteria on intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 83-87.
20. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Fiske, S. T., & Click, P. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 97-115.
22. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of re-categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
23. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 22, 267-277.
24. Gonzales, R., & Brown, R. (2000). Maintaining dual identity as strategy for reducing intergroup bias. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kent.
25. Haunschild, P. R., Moreland, R. L., & Murrell, A.J. ( 1994). Sources of resistance to mergers between groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1150-1178.
26. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R.J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "contact hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R.J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Horenczyk, G. (1996). Migrant identities in conflict: Acculturation attitudes and perceived acculturation ideologies. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 241-250). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
28. Hornsey, M.J., &: Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
29. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
30. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 816-817.
31. Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic books.
32. Nkomo, S. M., & Cox, T. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbookof organizational studies (pp. 338-356). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 184-204). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
34. Ouwerkerk, J. W., de Gilder, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
35. Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1981). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277-291.
36. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. ( 1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctivcness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
37. Swann, W. B., Jr., & Ely, R.J. (1984). A battle of wills: self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287-1302.
38. Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1981). The social psychology of minorities. In Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Terry, D.J., Carey, C.J., & Callan, V.J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 267-280.
40. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Oxford University Press.
41. Tuner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Turner, P.J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97-111.
42. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
43. Van Leeuwen, E., & Van Knippenberg, D. (in press). Organizational identification following a merger: The importance of agreeing to differ. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
44. Van Oudenhoven, J.-P., Prins, K., & Buunk, B. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995-1013.
45. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
46. Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leycns, J.-P., & Paladino, M.-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.
47. Yzerbyt, V., Leyens, J.-P., & Bellour, F. (1995). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decision about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1-16.