Deconstructing Heterostyly: The Evolutionary Role Of Incompatibility System, Pollinators, And Floral Architecture

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2072-2082

  Santos Gally, Rocío ^a   Gonzalez Voyer, Alejandro ^b   Arroyo, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evolutionary transitions; floral architecture; heterostyly; incompatibility system; Pollinators

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; FLORAL TRAIT; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYLOGENETICS; POLLEN; POLLINATOR; POLYMORPHISM; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY TRANSITIONS; FLORAL ARCHITECTURE; FLOWER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HETEROSTYLY; HISTOLOGY; INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEM; NARCISSUS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POLLINATORS; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY (PLANT);

EVOLUTIONARY TRANSITIONS; FLORAL ARCHITECTURE; HETEROSTYLY; INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEM; POLLINATORS;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; NARCISSUS; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN FLOWERING PLANTS;

NARCISSUS;

EID: 84879788686     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12087     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alexandersson, R., and S. D. Johnson 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc. R. Soc. B 269:631-636.
2. Arroyo, J., and A. Dafni 1995. Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytol. 129:135-145.
3. Baker, A. M., J. D. Thompson, and S. C. H. Barret 2000. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84:514-524.
4. Baker, H. G. 1966. Evolution functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20:349-368.
5. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature 3:274-284.
6. Barrett, S. C. H., and L. D. Harder 2005. The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus). New Phytol. 165:45-53.
7. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. H. Richards 1990. Heterostyly in tropical plants. Pp. 35-61 in G. Prance and G. Gottsberger, eds. Reproductive systems and speciation in tropical woody plants. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
8. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. S. Shore 2008. New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. Pp. 3-32 in V. Franklin-Tong, ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
9. Barrett, S. C. H., D. H. Wilken, and W. W. Cole 2000. Heterostyly in the Lamiaceae: the case of Salvia brandegeei. Plant Syst. Evol. 223:211-219.
10. Becerra, J. X., and D. G. Lloyd 1992. Competition-dependent abscission of self-pollinated flowers of Phormium tenax (Agavaceae): a second action of self-incompatibility at the whole flower level? Evolution 46:458-469.
11. Bjorkman, T. 1995. The effectiveness of heterostyly in preventing illegitimate pollination in dish-shaped flowers. Sex Plant Reprod. 8:143-146.
12. Blanchard, J. 1990. Narcissus, a guide to wild daffodils. Alpine Garden Society, Surrey, U.K.
13. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
14. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth 1979. The maintenance of distyly. Am. Nat. 114:499-513.
15. Darwin, C. 1877. The differences form of flowers on plants of the same species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Dobson, H. E. M., J. Arroyo, G. Bergstrom, and I. Groth 1997. Interspecific variation in floral fragrances within the genus Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25:685-706.
17. Dorda, E., and J. Fernández Casas 1989. Estudios morfológicos del género Narcissus L. Anatomía de la hoja y el escapo III. Fontqueria 27:103-162.
18. Drummond, A. J., and A. Rambaut 2007. BEAST: bayesian evolutionary analyses by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214.
19. Ferrero, V., J. Arroyo, S. Castro, and L. Navarro 2012. Unusual heterostyly: style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Ann. Bot.-Lond. 109:655-665.
20. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160:712-726.
21. Ganders, F. R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zeal. J. Bot. 17:607-635.
22. Gonzalez-Voyer, A., J. L. Fitzpatrick, and N. Kolm 2008. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62:2015-2026.
23. Graham, S. W., and S. C. H. Barrett 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:1007-1021.
24. Guggisberg, A., G. Mansion, S. Kelso, and E. Conti 2006. Evolution of biogeographic patterns, ploidy levels, and breeding systems in a diploid-polyploid species complex of Primula. New Phytol. 171:617-632.
25. Herrera, C. M. 1995. Floral biology, microclimate and ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. Ecology 76:218-228.
26. Kohn, J. R., S. W. Graham, B. Morton, J. J. Doyle, and S. C. H. Barrett 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Ponteriaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
27. Lloyd, D. G., and D. J. Schoen 1992. Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants.1. Functional dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:358-369.
28. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigma in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zeal. J. Bot. 81:199-205.
29. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb 1992. The evolution of heterostyly. Pp. 151-178 in S. C. H. Barret, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
30. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
31. Mast, A. R., and E. Conti 2006. The primrose path to heterostyly. New Phytol. 171:439-442.
32. Meerow, A. W., J. Francisco-Ortega, D. N. Kuhn, and R. J. Schnell 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography within the Eurasian clade of Amaryllidaceae based on plastid ndhF and nrDNA ITS sequences: lineage sorting in a reticulate area? Syst. Bot. 31:42-60.
33. Mulcahy, D. L. 1964. The reproductive biology of Oxalis priceae. Am. J. Bot. 51:915-1044.
34. Ornduff, R. 1972. The breakdown of trimorphic incompatibility in Oxalis section Corniculatae. Evolution 26:52-65.
35. Pagel, M., and A. Meade 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167:808-825.
36. Pérez, R., P. Vargas, and J. Arroyo 2004. Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). New Phytol. 161:235-252.
37. Pérez-Barrales, R., and J. Arroyo 2010. Pollinator shifts and the loss of style polymorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 23:1117-1128.
38. Pérez-Barrales, R., P. Vargas, and J. Arroyo 2006. New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytol. 171:553-567.
39. Rama Swamy, N., and B. Bahadur 1984. Pollen flow in dimorphic Turnera subulata (Turneraceae). New Phytol. 98:205-209.
40. Rasband, W. 2008. ImageJ. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij
41. Revell, L. J. 2010a. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 1:319-329.
42. Revell, L. J.. 2010b. Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63:3258-3268.
43. Santos-Gally, R. 2011. The evolution of stylar polymorphism at different levels: an evaluation of the Darwinian hypothesis. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, pp. 229.
44. Santos-Gally, R., P. Vargas, and J. Arroyo 2012. Insights into Neogene Mediterranean biogeography based on phylogenetic relationships of mountain and lowland lineages of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). J. Biogeogr. 39:782-789.
45. Santos-Gally, R., Pérez-Barrales, V. R., Simón, and J. Arroyo 2013. The role of short-tongued insects in floral variation across the range of a style dimorphic plant. Ann. Bot.-Lond. 111:317-328.
46. Shore, J. S., M. M. Arbo, and A. Fernandez 2006. Breeding system variation, genetics and evolution in the Turneraceae. New Phytol. 3:539-551.
47. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and company, New York.
48. SPSS I. 2009. PASW Statistics 18. 18th ed. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
49. Stone, J. L., and J. D. Thompson 1994. The evolution of dystyly-pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48:1595-1606.
50. Team, R. D. C. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
51. Thompson, J. D., A. C. Cesaro, and J. Arroyo 2012. Morpho ratio variation and sex organ reciprocity in style dimorphic Narcissus assoanus. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 173:885-893.
52. Tripp, E. A., and P. S. Manos 2008. Is floral specialization an evolutionary dead-end? Pollination system transitions in Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Evolution 62:1712-1736.
53. Webb, C. J., and D. G. Lloyd 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms II. Herkogamy. New Zeal. J. Bot. 24:163-178.
54. Whittall, J. B., and S. A. Hodges 2007. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in Columbine flowers. Nature 447:706-712.