Unusual heterostyly: Style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 655-665

  Ferrero, V ^a,b   Arroyo, J ^c   Castro, S ^a   Navarro, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Boragineae; Character transitions; evolution; Glandora; heterostyly; incompatibility system; ITS; Lithodora; Lithospermeae; phylogenetic reconstruction; trnL UAA intron

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INCOMPATIBILITY; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYMORPHISM; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

BORAGINACEAE; CLASSIFICATION; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY (PLANT);

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BORAGINACEAE; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA, PLANT; FLOWERS; GENETIC LINKAGE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN FLOWERING PLANTS;

BORAGINACEAE; LITHODORA;

EID: 84857475715     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr222     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Allen AM, Hiscock SJ. 2008. Evolution and phylogeny of self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. In: Franklin-Tong VE. ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 73-101.
2. Arroyo J, Barrett SCH, Hidalgo R, Cole WW. 2002. Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1242-1249. (Pubitemid 34915473)
3. Baker HG. 1966. The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20: 349-368.
4. Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84: 514-524. (Pubitemid 30446088)
5. Bañares A ́ , Blanca G, Güemes J, Moreno JC, Ortiz S. eds 2003. Atlas y libro rojo de la flora vascular amenazada de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza.
6. Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 274-284. (Pubitemid 34279796)
7. Barrett SCH, Shore JS. 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41: 340-354.
8. Barrett SCH, Shore JS. 2008. New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In: Franklin-Tong VE. ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3-32.
9. Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Arroyo J, Cruzan MB, Lloyd DG. 1997. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity 78: 135-145. (Pubitemid 27114580)
10. Bateman AJ. 1968. The role of heterostyly in Narcissus and Mirabilis. Evolution 22: 645-646.
11. Böhle U-R, Hilger HH, MartinW. 1996. Island colonization and evolution of the insular woody habit in Echium L. (Boraginaceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 11740-11745. (Pubitemid 26347193)
12. Bollback JP. 2006. SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 88.
13. Boyd AE. 2004. Breeding system of Macromeria viridiflora (Boraginaceae) and geographic variation in pollinator assemblages. American Journal of Botany 11: 1809-1813. (Pubitemid 43186478)
14. Brys R, Jacquemyn H, Beeckman T. 2008. Morph-ratio variation, population size and female reproductive success in distylous Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1281-1289.
15. Calendini F, Martin JF. 2005. PaupUP version, 1.0.3.1. A free graphical frontend for PAUP* Dos software. http://www.agro-montpellier.fr/sppe/ Recherche/JFM/PaupUp/main.htm
16. Casper BB. 1985. Self-compatibility in distylous Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae). New Phytologist 99: 149-154.
17. Casper BB, Wiens D. 1981. Fixed rates of random ovule abortion in Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae) and its possible relation to seed dispersal. Ecology 62: 866-869.
18. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. American Naturalist 114: 467-498.
19. Cohen JI. 2011. A phylogenetic analysis of morphological and molecular characters of Lithospermum L. (Boraginaceae) and related taxa: evolutionary relationships and character evolution. Cladistics 27: 1-22.
20. Corbet SA. 1978. Bee visits and the nectar of Echium vulgare L. and Sinapis alba L. Ecological Entomology 3: 25-37.
21. Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell BT. 1999. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 405-410. (Pubitemid 29428466)
22. Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.
23. De Jong TJ, Klinkhamer GL. 1989. Limiting factors for seed production in Cynoglossum officinale. Oecologia 80: 167-172.
24. Dulberger R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-compatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution 18: 361-363.
25. Dulberger R. 1970. Floral dimorphism in Anchusa hybrida Ten. Israel Journal of Botany 19: 37-41.
26. Dulberger R. 1992. Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett SCH. ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 41-84.
27. Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Valido A, Olesen JM. 2004. Impact of introduced honey bees on native pollination interactions of the endemic Echium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) on Tenerife, Canary Islands. Biological Conservation 118: 301-311. (Pubitemid 38484800)
28. Ferrero V, Arroyo J, Vargas P, Thompson JD, Navarro L. 2009. Evolutionary transitions of style polymorphisms in Lithodora (Boraginaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11: 111-125.
29. Ferrero V, Chapela I, Arroyo J, Navarro L. 2011a. Reciprocal style polymorphisms are not so discrete: the case of heterostyly in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Biology 13 (Suppl. 1): 7-18.
30. Ferrero V, Castro S, Sánchez JM, Navarro L. 2011b. Stigma-anther reciprocity, pollinators and pollen transfer efficiency in populations of heterostylous species of Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 291: 267-276.
31. Ganders FR. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635.
32. Gibbs PE. 1986. Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems have the same sporophytic mechanism? Plant Systematics and Evolution 154: 285-323.
33. Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA, Allen JA. 1998. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum oficinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia 113: 502-508. (Pubitemid 28126741)
34. Hilger HH, Selvi F, Papini A, Bigazzi M. 2004. Molecular systematic of Boraginaceae tribe Boragineae based on ITS1 and trnL sequences, with special reference to Anchusa sensu lato. Annals of Botany 94: 201-212. (Pubitemid 41301668)
35. Jules ES, Rathcke BJ. 1999. Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conservation Biology 13: 784-793. (Pubitemid 29368640)
36. Kalisz S, Vogler DW, Hanley KM. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430: 884-887. (Pubitemid 39119214)
37. Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 467-497. (Pubitemid 43068867)
38. Levin DA. 1968. Breeding system of Lithospermum caroliniense: adaptation and counteradaptation. American Naturalist 102: 427-441.
39. Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 358-369. (Pubitemid 24406487)
40. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH. ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 151-178.
41. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH. ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 179-207.
42. MaddisonWP, Maddison DR. 2007. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.01 for Windows. Computer program and documentation distributed by the authors at website: http://mesquiteproject.org.
43. Mather K, de Winton D. 1941. Adaptation and counter-adaptation of the breeding system in Primula: the nature of breeding systems. Annals of Botany 5: 297-311.
44. Montaner C, Floris E, Alvarez JM. 2000. Is self-compatibility the main breeding system in borage (Borago officinalis L.)? Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 185-189. (Pubitemid 30483614)
45. Nielsen RH, Huelsenbeck JP. 2002. Detecting positively selected amino acid sites using posterior predictive p-values. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 7: 576-588.
46. Nylander JAA. 2002. Testing models of evolution - MrModeltest version 1.1b. Computer program and documentation distributed by author, website: http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html.
47. Opler PA, Baker HG, Frankie GW. 1975. Reproductive biology of some Costa Rica Cordia species (Boraginaceae). Biotropica 7: 234-247.
48. Pagel M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612-622. (Pubitemid 129479567)
49. Pannel JR, Barrett SCH. 1998. Baker's Law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution 52: 657-668. (Pubitemid 28324496)
50. Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2006. New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytologist 171: 553-567. (Pubitemid 44051308)
51. Philipp M, Schou O. 1981. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system: distyly, self incompatibility, pollen load and fecundity in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). New Phytologist 89: 693-703.
52. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA sustitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. (Pubitemid 28552116)
53. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
54. Ray PM, Chisaki HF. 1957. Studies on Amsinckia. American Journal of Botany 44: 529-544.
55. Riveros M, Arroyo MTK, Humana AM. 1987. An unusual kind of distyly in Quinchamalium chilense (Santalaceae) on Volcan Casablanca, Southern Chile. American Journal of Botany 74: 313-320.
56. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574. (Pubitemid 37038874)
57. Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH. 1999. Differential ovule development following self- and cross pollination: the basis of selfsterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855-870.
58. Sánchez JM, Ferrero V, Navarro L. 2008. A new approach to the quantification of degree of reciprocity in distylous (sensu lato) plant populations. Annals of Botany 102: 463-472.
59. Schluter D, Price T, Mooers A, Ludwig D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699-1711. (Pubitemid 28104532)
60. Schoen DJ, Johnston MO, L'Heureux AM, Marsolais JV. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51: 1090-1099. (Pubitemid 27393131)
61. Schou O, Philipp M. 1983. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system II. Pollen tube growth and seed sets following compatible and incompatible crossing within Anchusa officinalis L. (Boraginaceae). In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E. eds. Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. New York: Elsevier, 219-227.
62. Schou O, Philipp M. 1984. An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. 3. Genetic control of distyly and self incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 68: 139-144.
63. Snow G. 2005. TeachingDemos: demonstrations for teaching and learning. Rpackage version 1.5. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TeachingDemos/ TeachingDemos.pdf.
64. Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP. 1999. What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87: 185-190. (Pubitemid 29511251)
65. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.07b. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
66. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software, version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599. (Pubitemid 47236692)
67. UAA - sequence data and morphology. Taxon 57: 79-97. (Pubitemid 351449763)
68. Thompson JD. 2005. Plant evolution in the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibon TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680. (Pubitemid 24354800)
70. Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer.
71. Weller SG, Ornduff R. 1991. Pollen tube growth and inbreeding depression in Amsinckia grandiflora (Boraginaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 801-804.