Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs

Heredity

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 514-524

  Baker, Angela M ^a   Thompson, John D ^b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Disassortative mating; Female fertility; Mating system; Plant sexual polymorphism; Self sterility; Stigma height dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLOENZYME; DIMORPHISM; FEMALE FERTILITY; FRANCE; MALE FERTILITY; MATING SYSTEM; OUTCROSSING; POLLINATION; SELF COMPATIBILITY; SIMULATION; STIGMA; STYLE;

ASSORTATIVE MATING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; POLYMORPHISM;

EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, PLANT; GENOTYPE; PLANTS; POLLEN; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEEDS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMARYLLIDACEAE; INSECTA; NARCISSUS; NARCISSUS ASSOANUS; NARCISSUS DUBIUS;

EID: 0033947826     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00686.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ARROYO, J. AND DAFNI, A. 1995. Variation in habitat, season, flower traits, and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytol., 129, 135-145.
2. BAKER, A. M., THOMPSON, J. D. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 2000. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios. Heredity, 84, in press.
3. BARRETT, S. C. H. (ed.) 1992. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. BARRETT, S. C. H. AND GLOVER, D. E. 1985. On the Darwinian hypothesis of the adaptive significance of tristyly. Evolution, 39, 766-774.
5. BARRETT, S. C. H., BROWN, A. H. D. AND SHORE, J. S. 1987. Disassortative mating in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). Heredity, 58, 49-55.
6. BARRETT, S. C. H., MORGAN, M. T. AND HUSBAND, B. C. 1989. The dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution, 43, 1398-1416.
7. BARRETT, S. C. H., LLOYD, D. G. AND ARROYO, J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H. (eds) Floral Biology. Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants, pp. 339-376. Chapman & Hall, New York.
8. BARRETT, S. C. H., COLE, W. W., ARROYO, J., CRUZAN, M. B. AND LLOYD, D. G. 1997. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity, 78, 135-145.
9. BATEMAN, A. J. 1954. The genetics of Narcissus. I. Sterility. In: Daffodil and Tulip Yearbook 19, pp. 23-29. Royal Horticulture Society, London.
10. BOOMER, W. F. 1960. Genetics of homostyly in populations of Primula vulgaris. Phil. Trans R. Soc. B, 242, 517-549.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. Evolution, 33, 486-498.
12. CHARLESWORTH, D. AND CHARLESWORTH, B. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. Am. Nat., 114, 467-498.
13. CROSBY, J. L. 1949. Selection of an unfavourable gene complex. Evolution, 3, 212-230.
14. DARWIN, C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. Reprinted in 1986. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. DULBERGER, R. 1964. Floral dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution, 18, 361-363.
16. ECKERT, C. G. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1994. Post-pollination mechanisms and the maintenance of outcrossing in self-compatible, tristylous, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Heredity, 72, 396-411.
17. GANDERS, F. R. 1974. Disassortative pollination in the distylous plant Jepsonia heterandra. Can. J. Bot., 52, 2401-2406.
18. GANDERS, F. R. 1975. Mating patterns in self-compatible distylous populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Can. J. Bot., 53, 773-779.
19. HERRERA, C. M. 1995. Floral biology, microclimate, and pollination by ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. Ecology, 76, 218-228.
20. HEUCH, I. 1979. Equilibrium populations of heterostylous plants. Theor. Pop. Biol., 15, 43-57.
21. HUSBAND, B. C. AND SCHEMSKE, D. W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50, 54-70.
22. JAIN, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 7, 69-95.
23. KOHN, J. R. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution, 46, 43-55.
24. LLOYD, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contr. Gray Herb., 195, 3-133.
25. LLOYD, D. G. AND WEBB, C. J. 1992. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, pp. 179-207. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
26. RITLAND, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J. Hered., 81, 235-237.
27. SAGE, T. L., STRUMAS, F., COLE, W. W. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1999. Differential ovule development following self-and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot., 86, 855-870.
28. SAS 1994. JMP Users Guide, version 3.0.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
29. SEAVEY, S. R. AND BAWA, K. S. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot. Rev., 52, 195-219.
30. SHORE, J. S. AND BARRETT, S. C. H. 1987. Inheritance of floral and isozyme polymorphisms in Turnera ulmifolia L. J. Hered., 78, 44-48.
31. SOKAL, R. R. AND ROHLF, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, CA.
32. WENDEL, J. F. AND WEEDEN, N. F. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S. (eds) Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.