Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography within the Eurasian clade of Amaryllidaceae based on plastid ndhF and nrDNA ITS sequences: Lineage sorting in a reticulate area?

Systematic Botany

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-60

  Meerow, Alan W ^a,c   Francisco Ortega, Javier ^b,c   Kuhn, David N ^b   Schnell, Raymond J ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIS; AMARYLLIDACEAE; GALANTHUS; HANNONIA; LAPIEDRA; LEUCOJUM; NARCISSUS; PANCRATIUM; STERNBERGIA; VAGARIA;

EID: 33645226786     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 03636445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364406775971787     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. ÁLVAREZ, I. and J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417-434.
3. AMABILE-CUEVAS, C. F. and M. E. CHICUREL. 1993. Horizontal gene transfer. American Scientist 81: 332-341.
4. ARTJUSHENKO, Z. T. 1970. The genus Ungernia. Plant Life 26: 173-188.
5. AVISE, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. BAILEY, C. D., T. G. CARR, S. A. HARRIS, and C E. HUGHES. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 435-455.
7. BAUM, D. A., R. SMALL, and J. F. WENDEL. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Systematic Biology 47: 181-207.
8. BAUML, J. A. 1979. A study of the genus Hymenocallis (Amaryllidaceae) in Mexico. M. S. thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
9. BOOY, G., J. VAN DER SCHOOT, and B. VOSMAN. 2000. Heterogeneity of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) in Tulipa (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 225: 29-41.
10. BOSE S. and W. S. FLORY. 1963. A study of phylogeny and of karyotype evolution in Lycoris. Nucleus 6: 141-156.
11. BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. and P. DE BOLÒS. 1957. Les groupments vegetaux du basin moyen de l'Ebre et leur dynamisme. Annales de la Estacíon Experimentale Aula Dei 5: 1-266.
12. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 198-213.
13. BROOKS, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution: methodological and theoretical update. Systematic Zoology 39: 14-30.
14. BUCKLER, E. S. and T. P. HOLTSFORD. 1996a. Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 612-622.
15. _ and _. 1996b. Zea ribosomal repeat evolution and substitution patterns. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 623-632.
16. _, A. IPPOLITO, and T. P. HOLTSFORD. 1997. The evolution of ribosomal DNA: divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics 145: 821-832.
17. CAMPBELL, C. S., M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, B. G. BALDWIN, L. A. ALICE, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1997. Persistent nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence polymorphism in the Amelanchier agamic complex (Rosaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 81-90.
18. CHASE, M. W., S. KNAPP, A. V. COX, J. J. CLARKSON, Y. BUTSKO, J. JOSEPH, V. SAVOLAINEN, and A. S. PAROKONNY. 2003. Molecular systematics, GISH and origin of hybrid taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Annals of Botany 92: 107-127.
19. DAVIS, A. P. 1999. The genus Galanthus. Portland: Timber Press.
20. DAVIS, P. H. and I. HEDGE. 1971. Floristic links between N. W. Africa and S. W. Asia. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 75: 43-57.
21. DERCOURT, J., L. P ZONENSHAIN, L. E. RICOU, V. G. KAZMIN, X. LE PICHON, A. L. KNIPPER, C. GRANDJACQUET, I. M. SBORTSHIKOV, J. GEYSSANT, C. LEPVRIER, D. H. PECHERSKY, J. BOULIN, J. C. SIBUET, L. A. SAVOSTIN, O. SOROKHTIN, M. WESTPHAL, M. L. BAZHENOV, J. P. LAUER, and B. BIJU-DUVAL. 1986. Geological evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic to the Pamirs since the Lias. Tectonophysics 123: 241-315.
22. DEWEY, J., W. C. PITMAN, W. B. F. RYAN, and J. BONNIN. 1973. Plate tectonics and the evolution of the alpine system. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84: 3137-3180.
23. DUMOLIN-LAPÉGUE, S., B. DEMESURE, S. FINESCHI, V. LE CORRE, and R. J. PETIT. 1997. Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146: 1475-1487.
24. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ , A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
25. _, and _. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
26. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatability methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
27. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
28. FERNANDES, A. 1951. Sur la phylogénie des espècies du genre Narcissus L. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 25(2nd ser.): 113-190.
29. _. 1952. On the systematic position of Lapiedra martinezii Lag. Plant Life 8: 60-68.
30. _. 1967. Contribution à la connaisance de la biosysté matique de quelques espècies du genre Narcissus L. Portugaliae Acta Biologica (B) 9: 1-44.
31. _. 1968a. Keys to the identification of native and naturalized taxa of the genus Narcissus. Daffodil and Tulip Year Book 1968: 37-66.
32. _. 1968b. Improvements in the classification of the genus Narcissus. Plant Life 23: 51-57.
33. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
34. FUERTES AGUILAR, J., J. A. ROSSELLÓ, and G. NIETO FELINER. 1999. Molecular evidence for the compilospecies model of reticulate evolution in Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Systematic Biology 48: 735-754.
35. GERNANDT, D. S., A. LISTON, and D. PIÑERO. 2001. Variation in the nrDNA its of Pinus subsection cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 449-467.
36. GRAHAM, S. W. and S. C. H. BARRETT. 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1007-1021.
37. _, J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, and S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology 47: 545-567.
38. GRANT, V. 1983. The systematic and geographical distribution of hawkmoth flowers in the temperate North American flora. Botanical Gazette 144: 439-449.
39. HARTMANN, S., J. D. NASON, and D. BHATTACHARYA. 2001. Extensive ribososmal DNA genic variation in the columnar cactus Lophocereus. Journal of Molecular Evolution 53: 124-134.
40. HIGGINS, D. G. and P. M. SHARP. 1988. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73: 237-244.
41. HIPP, A. L., J. C. HALL, and K. J. SYSTMA. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 53: 81-89.
42. HOELZER, G. A. 1997. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial gene-trees versus nuclear-gene trees revisited. Evolution 51: 274-281.
43. HUELSENBECK, J. P. and F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
44. _, R. NIELSEN, and J. P. BOLLBACK. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
45. ITO, M., A. KAWAMOTO, Y. KITA, T. YUKAWA, and S. KURITA. 1999. Phylogeny of Amaryllidaceae based on matK sequence data. Japanese Journal of Plant Research 112: 207-216.
46. JUAN, C., B. C. EMERSON, P. OROMÍ, and G. M. HEWITT. 2000. Colonization and diversification: towards a phylogeographic synthesis for the Canary Islands. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 104-109.
47. KHOLODOV, V. N. and R. I. NEDUMOV. 1996. Problems of the Caucasus Palaeoland existence during the Oligocene-Miocene time. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 4: 181-190.
48. KIDWELL, M. G. 1993. Lateral transfer in natural populations of eukaryotes. Annual Review of Genetics 27: 235-256.
49. KIM, K. J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1995. ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 92: 10379-10383.
50. KITA, Y. and M. ITO. 2000. Nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and phylogeny in East Asian Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae), with special reference to extensive polymorphism in individual plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 225: 1-13.
51. KRIJGSMAN, W. 2002. The Mediterranean: mare nostrum of earth sciences. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 205: 1-12.
52. KURITA, S. 1986. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae. 1. General karyomorphological characteristics of the genus. Cytologia 51: 803-815.
53. _. 1987a. Variation and evolution on the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae II. Karyotype analysis of ten taxa among which seven are native in China. Cytologia 52: 19-40.
54. _. 1987b. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae III. Intraspecific variation in the karyotype of L. traubii Hayward. Cytologia 52: 117-128.
55. _. 1987c. Variation and evolution in the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae IV. Cytologia 52: 137-149.
56. _. 1989. Variation and evolution of the karyotype of Lycoris, Amaryllidaceae V. Chromosomal variation in L. sanguina Maxim. Plant Species Biology 4: 47-60.
57. LLEDÓ, M. D., A. P. DAVIS, M. B. CRESPO, M. W. CHASE, andM. F. FAY. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Leucojum and Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) based on plastid matK and nuclear ribosomal spacer (ITS) DNA sequences and morphology. Plant Systematics and Evolution 246: 223-243.
58. MADDISON, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
59. MARTÍN-PIERA, F. and I. SANMARTÍN. 1999. Biogeografía de áreas y biogeografía de artrópodos Holárticos y Mediterráneos. Pp. 535-560 in Evolution and phylogeny of Arthropoda, eds. A.Melic, J. J. De Haro, M. Méndez and I. Ribera. Boletín SEA, 26. Zaragoza: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa.
60. MASON-GAMER, R. J., K. E. HOLSINGER, and R. K. JANSEN. 1995. Chloroplast DNA haplotype variation within and among populations of Coreopsis grandiflora (Asteraceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 371-381.
61. MATHEW, B. 1973. Dwarf bulbs. New York: Arco Publishing.
62. MAYOL, M. and J.A. ROSSELLO. 2001. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 167-176.
63. MCKINNON, G. E., D. A. STEANE, B. M. POTTS, and R. E. VAILLANCOURT. 1999. Incongruence between chloroplast and species phylogenies in Eucalyptus subgenus Monocalyptus (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1038-1046.
64. MEEROW, A. W. 1995. Towards a phylogeny of the Amaryllidaceae. Pp. 169-179 in Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, volume 1, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. R. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
65. _ and J. R. CLAYTON. 2004. Generic relationships among the baccate-fruited Amaryllidaceae (tribe Haemantheae) inferred from plastid and nuclear non-coding DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 244: 141-155.
66. _ and B. DEHGAN. 1985. The auriculate pollen grain of Hymenocallis quitoensis Herb. (Amaryllidaceae) and its systematic implications. American Journal of Botany 72: 540-547.
67. _ and D. A. SNIJMAN. 1998. Amaryllidaceae. Pp. 83-110 in Families and genera of vascular plants, volume 3, ed. K. Kubitzki. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
68. _ and _. 2001. Phylogeny of Amaryllidaceae tribe Amaryllideae based on nrDNA ITS sequences and morphology. American Journal of Botany 88: 2321-2330.
69. _ and _. In press. The never-ending story: multigene approaches to the phylogeny of the Amaryllidaceae. In Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. 2 vols, eds. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, C. W. Hamilton, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince, and M. G. Simpson. Claremont: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden.
70. _, M. F. FAY, C. L. GUY, Q-B LI, F. Q. ZAMAN, and M. W. CHASE. 1999. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F sequence data. American Journal of Botany 86: 1325-1345.
71. _, C. L. GUY, Q.-B. LI, and S.-L. YANG. 2000. Phylogeny of the American Amaryllidaceae based on nrDNA ITS sequences. Systematic Botany 25: 708-726.
72. _, and J. R. CLAYTON. 2002. Phylogeny of the tribe Hymenocallideae (Amaryllidaceae) based on morphology and molecular characters. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 400-413.
73. _, D. J. LEHMILLER, and J. R. CLAYTON. 2003. Phylogeny and biogeography of Crinum L. (Amaryllidaceae) inferred from nuclear and limited plastid non-coding DNA sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 349-363.
74. MOORE, W. S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49: 718-726.
75. MORTON, J. K. 1965. The experimental taxonomy of the West African species of Pancratium L. (Amaryllidaceae). Kew Bulletin 19: 337-347.
76. MÜLLER-DOBLIES, D. and U. MÜLLER-DOBLIES. 1978a. Bulbs and morphology: Ungernia. Lagscalia 8: 13-23.
77. _ and _. 1978b. Studies on tribal systematics of Amaryllidaceae 1. The systematic position of Lapiedra Lag. Lagascalia 8: 13-23.
78. _ and _. 1996. Tribes and subtribes and some species combinations in Amaryllidaceae J.St.-Hil. emend. R. Dahlgren et al. 1985. Feddes Repertiorum 107: s. c. 1-9.
79. NELSON, G. J. and N. I. PLATNICK. 1978. A method of analysis for historical biogeography. Systematic Zoology 27: 1-16.
80. OLMSTEAD, R. G. and P. A. REEVES. 1995. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 176-193.
81. _ and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics - an empirical approach using 3 molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
82. OOSTERBROEK, P. and J. W. ARNTZEN. 1992. Area cladograms of circum-Mediterranean taxa in relation to Mediterranean palaeogeography. Journal of Biogeography 19: 3-20.
83. PAGE, R. D. M. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of relationships among genes, organisms, and areas. Systematic Biology 43: 58-77.
84. PIRES, J. C. and K. J. SYTSMA. 2002. A phylogenetic evaluation of a biosystematic framework: Brodiaea and related petaloid monocots (Themidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1342-1359.
85. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
86. REEVES, G., M. W. CHASE, P. GOLDBLATT, T. DE CHIES, B. LEJEUNE, M. F. FAY, A. V. COX, and P. J. RUDALL. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Iridaceae based on four plastid sequences regions: trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, rps4 and rbcL. American Journal of Botany 88: 2074-2087.
87. RIBERA, I. and J. BLASCO-ZUMETA. 1998. Biogeographical links between steppe insects in the Monegros region (Aragón, NE Spain), the eastern Mediterranean, and central Asia. Journal of Biogeography 25: 969-986.
88. RIESEBERG, L. H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359-389.
89. RODRIGO, A. G., M. KELLY-BORGES, P. R. BERGQUIST, and P. L. BERGQUIST. 1993. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. New Zealand Journal of Botany 31: 257-268.
90. RODRÍGUEZ, F., J. F. OLIVER, A. MARÍN, and J. R. MEDINA. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485-501.
91. RÖGL, F. and F. F. STEININGER. 1983. Von Zerfall der Tethys zu Mediterran und Paratethys. Die neogene Palaeogeographie und Palinspastik des zirkum-mediterranen Raumes. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien (A) 85: 135-163.
92. ROKAS, A., B. L. WILLIAMS, N. KING, and S. B. CARROLL. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
93. RONQUIST, F. 1996. DIVA v. 1.1. Computer program for MacOS and Win32. Available from (http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/DIVA).
94. _. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology 46: 195-203.
95. RUGGIERI, G. 1967. The Miocene and later evolution of the Mediterranean Sea. Pp. 283-290 in Aspects of Tethyan biogeography, eds. C. G. Adams and D. V. Ager. London: Systematics Association.
96. SANDERSON, M. J. and H. B. SHAFFER. 2002. Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 49-72.
97. SANMARTÍN, I. 2003. Dispersal vs. vicariance in theMediterranean: historical biogeography of the Palearctic Pachydeminae (Coleoptera, Scarabaedoidea). Journal of Biogeography 30: 1883-1897.
98. _, H. ENGHOFF, and F. RONQUIST. 2001. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73: 345-390.
99. SIDDALL, M. E. 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: long-branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris Zone. Cladistics 14: 209-220.
100. SMALL, R. L., R. C. CRONN, and J. F. WENDEL. 2004. Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Austalian Systematic Botany 17: 145-170.
101. SORENSON, M. D. 1996. TreeRot. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
102. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), v. 4.0 beta 10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
103. SYVANEN M. 1994. Horizontal gene transfer: evidence and possible consequences. Annual Review of Genetics 28: 237-261.
104. TAMURA, K. and M. NEI. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512-526.
105. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
106. THORNE, R. F. 1972. Major disjunctions in the geographic ranges of seed plants. Quarterly Review of Biology 47: 365-411.
107. TRAUB, H. P. 1963. Genera of the Amaryllidaceae. La Jolla: American Plant Life Society.
108. TUNIYEV, B. S. 1990. On the independence of the Colchic center of amphibian and reptile speciation. Asiatic Herpetology Research 3: 67-84.
109. TUTIN, T. G., V. H. HEYWOOD, N. A. BURGES, D. H. VALENTINE, S. M. WALTERS, and D. A. WEBB. 1972. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. VAZQUEZ, M. L., J. J. DOYLE, and K. C. NIXON. 2000. Paralogous ITS loci in Mexican red oak species (Quercus section Lobatae) and their implications in phylogeny reconstruction. American Journal of Botany 87(6, supplement): 164-165.
111. VERESHCHAGIN, N. K. 1959. Mammals of Caucasus: genesis of the terrain fauna. Moscow: USSR Academy of Science Publications [in Russian].
112. VOELKER, G. 1999. Dispersal, vicariance, and clocks: historical biogeography and speciation in a cosmopolitan passerine genus (Anthus: Motacillidae). Evolution 53: 1536-1552.
113. WENDEL, J. F. and J. J. DOYLE. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 265-296 in Molecular systematics II. DNA sequencing, eds. D. E. Soltis, P. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
114. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White. Orlando: Academic Press.
115. WILLIS, K. J. 1996. Where did all the flowers go? The fate of temperate European flora during glacial periods. Endeavour 20: 110-114.
116. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWI, and B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
117. ZHANHE, J. and A. W. MEEROW. 2001. Amaryllidaceae. Pp. 264-273 in Flora of China, vol. 24, eds. W. Zhengyi and P. H. Raven. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.