How Large-Scale Research Facilities Connect to Global Research

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 381-408

  Lauto, Giancarlo ^a,b   Valentin, Finn ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Basic research; Big science; International research collaboration; Proximity; Science policy

Indexed keywords

GLOBALIZATION; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INNOVATION; RESEARCH INSTITUTION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84879758285     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12027     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., Uddin, S., & Rasmussen, K. J. R. (2011). Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: Multi-levels and cross-time analysis. Scientometrics, 89, 687-710.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, 155-171.
3. Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34, 259-285.
4. Agrell, W. (2012). Framing prospects and risk in the public promotion of ESS Scandinavia. Science and Public Policy, 39, 429-438.
5. Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13, 559-580.
6. Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45, 893-904.
7. Autio, E., Hameri, A. P., & Vuola, O. (2004). A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers. Research Policy, 33, 107-126.
8. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56.
9. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2011). The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography. Research Policy, 40, 81-93. Retrieved from http://neutrons.ornl.gov/facilities/SNS/
10. Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37, 279-295.
11. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74.
12. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599-616.
13. Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31, 749-767.
14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
15. Colombelli, A., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2011). The persistence of innovation and path dependence. In C. Antonelli (Ed.), Handbook in the economic complexity of technological change (pp. 105-119). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
16. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.
17. Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107-1123.
18. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487-521.
19. Elzinga, A. (2012). Features of the current science policy regime: Viewed in historical perspective. Science and Public Policy, 39, 416-428.
20. Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 381-410). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 443-475.
22. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 909-928.
23. Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37, 665-677.
24. Foray, D., & Lissoni, F. (2010). University research and public-private interaction. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 276-314). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Frenken, K., Ponds, R., & Van Oort, F. (2010). The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 351-371.
26. Hackett, E. J., Conz, D., Parker, J., Bashford, J., & DeLay, S. (2004). Tokamaks and turbulence: Research ensembles, policy and technoscientific work. Research Policy, 33, 747-767.
27. Hallonsten, O., & Heinze, T. (2012). Institutional persistence through gradual organizational adaptation: Analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany. Science and Public Policy, 39, 450-463.
28. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Seung-Lye, K., & Sonnewald, D. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952-965.
29. Heinze, T., & Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Across institutional boundaries? Research Policy, 37, 888-899.
30. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39, 662-673.
31. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 721-738.
32. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015.
33. Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 153-158.
34. Institut Laue-Langevin. (2011). Report from the ILL Associates' Working Group on Neutrons in Europe for 2025. Retrieved from http://www.ill.eu/fileadmin/users_files/documents/news_and_events/news/Report_from_ILL_Neutron_Working_Group.pdf
35. Isabelle, D. A., & Heslop, L. A. (2011). Managing for success in international scientific collaborations: Views from Canadian government senior science manager. Science and Public Policy, 38, 349-364.
36. Jacob, M., & Hallonsten, O. (2012). The persistence of big science and megascience in research and innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 39, 411-415.
37. Kargon, R., Leslie, S. W., & Schoenberger, E. (1992). Far beyond big science: Science regions and the organization of research and development. In P. Galison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science. The growth of large-scale research (pp. 334-353). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
39. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Langford, C. H., & Langford, M. W. (2000). The evolution of rules for access to megascience research environments viewed from Canadian experience. Research Policy, 29, 169-179.
41. Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties. American Sociological Review, 46, 393-405.
42. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
43. Lundvall, B., & Borrás, S. (2004). Science, technology, and innovation policy. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 599-631). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
45. Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27, 389-414.
46. Melkers, J., & Wu, Y. (2009). Evaluating the improved research capacity of EPSCoR states: R&D funding and collaborative networks in the NSF EPSCoR program. Review of Policy Research, 26, 761-782.
47. Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22, 635-659.
48. Merz, M., & Biniok, P. (2010). How technological platforms reconfigure science-industry relations: The case of micro- and nanotechnology. Minerva, 48, 105-124.
49. Narin, F., Pinski, G., & Gee, H. H. (1976). Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(1), 25-45.
50. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313-323.
51. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. Lecture Notes in Physics, 650, 337-370.
52. Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016-1034.
53. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2012a). About ORNL. Retrieved from http://ornl.gov/ornlhome/about.shtml
54. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2012b). History of the Spallation Neutron Source. Retrieved from http://neutrons.ornl.gov/facilities/SNS/history/
55. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2012c). High Flux Isotope Reactor: Overview. Retrieved from http://neutrons.ornl.gov/facilities/HFIR/
56. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2012d). University partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.ornl.gov/ornlhome/university_partners.shtml
57. Papon, P. (2009). Intergovernmental cooperation in the making of European research. In H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, & L. Soete (Eds.), European science and technology policy: Towards integration or fragmentation? (pp. 24-43). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
58. Pestre, D., & Krige, J. (1992). The history of CERN. In P. Galison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science: The growth of large scale research (pp. 78-99). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1, 54-73.
60. Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 76-94.
61. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 423-443.
62. Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613-624.
63. Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34, 784-794.
64. Rosenberg, N. (1992). Scientific instrumentation and university research. Research Policy, 21, 381-390.
65. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509-532.
66. Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31, 681-730.
67. Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199-1235.
68. Taramasco, C., Cointet, J., & Roth, C. (2010). Academic team formation as evolving hypergraphs. Scientometrics, 85, 721-740.
69. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42, 423-428.
70. Wagner, C. S. (2006). International collaboration in science and technology: Promises and pitfalls. In L. Box & R. Engelhard (Eds.), Science and technology policy for development, dialogues at the interface (pp. 165-176). London, UK: Anthem Press.
71. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608-1618.
72. Westfall, C. (2012). Institutional persistence and the material transformation of the US national labs: The curious story of the advent of the Advanced Photon Source. Science and Public Policy, 39, 439-449.
73. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organisation of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47, 627-657.