Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 665-677

  Flink, Tim ^a   Schreiterer, Ulrich ^a  

^a WZB BERLIN SOCIAL SCIENCE CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-BORDER RELATIONS; DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HEURISTICS; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 78649299359     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234210X12778118264530     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ADL 2005. Internationalisation of R&D in the UK: a Review of Evidence. Report to the Office of Science and Technology. November.
2. Borrás, S 2003. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: from Government to Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
3. Braun, D 2008. Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), May, 227-239.
4. Chung, S 2002. Catching up through international linkages: science, technology and the Korean experience. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), December, 431-437.
5. De Coninck, H, C Fischer, R G Newell and T Ueno 2008. International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change. Energy Policy, 36(1), 335-356.
6. Dienel, H-L, K G Hammerlund and M Peterson 2002. The historical context of the evolution of national research systems and international RTD collaboration. Innovation, 15, 265-278.
7. Dufour, P 2002. Taking the (right?) fork in the road: Canada's two-track approach to domestic and international science and technology. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), December, 419-429.
8. EC, European Commission 2008. A Strategic Framework for International Science and Technological Cooperation. COM 2008/588 final.
9. Edler, J and P Boekholt 2001. Benchmarking national public policies to exploit international science and industrial research: a synopsis of current developments. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), August, 313-321.
10. Edler, J and S Kuhlmann 2008. Coordination within fragmentation: governance in knowledge policy in the German federal system. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), May, 265-276.
11. Engels, A and T Ruschenburg 2008. The uneven spread of global science: patterns of international collaboration in global environmental change research. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), June, 347-360.
12. Georghiou, L 1998. Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27, 611-626.
13. Guzzetti, L 1995. A Brief History of European Union Research Policy. Brussels/Luxembourg: European Communities.
14. Haas, P M 1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
15. Klein, H 2001. Technology push-over: defense downturns and civilian technology policy. Research Policy, 30, 937-951.
16. Kuhlmann, S 2008. Forschungs- und Innovationssysteme im internationalen Wettbewerb. In Wettlauf ums Wissen. Außenwissenschaftspolitik im Zeitalter der Wissensrevolution, ed. G Schütte, pp. 52-58. Berlin: Berlin University Press.
17. Lederman, L 1987. Science and technology policies and priorities: a comparative analysis. Science, 237, 1125-1133.
18. Lord, K M and V Turekian 2007. Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science, 315, 769-770.
19. Mustar, P and Larédo, P 2002. Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) or the disappearance of Colbertist state. Research Policy, 31, 55-72.
20. Nye, J S J 1990. Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153-171.
21. Pickering, T R and K Shine 2001. The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development: an Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22. Ratchford, J T 1998. Put science and technology back into foreign policy. Science, 282(5394), 1650.
23. Rosenau, J N 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: a Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
24. Skolnikoff, E B 1993. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
25. Stein, J A and A Ahmed 2007. The European Union as a model of international co-operation in science, technology and sustainable development. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 654-669.
26. Stein, J A 2002a. Globalisation, science, technology and policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), December, 402-408.
27. Stein, J A 2002b. Science, technology and European foreign policy: European integration, global interaction. Science and Public Policy, 29, December, 463-477.
28. Tanaka, Y and R Hirasawa 1996. Features of policy-making processes in Japan's Council for Science and Technology. Research Policy, 25, 999-1011.
29. Technopolis 2005. Drivers, Barriers, Benefits and Government Support of UK International Engagement in Science and Innovation. Final Report. 8 December. Available at , last accessed 12 January 2009.
30. Wagner, C S 2002. The elusive partnership: science and foreign policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), December, 409-417.
31. Wagner, C S and L Leydesdorff 2005. Network structure, selforganization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608-1618.
32. Weiss, C 2005. Science, technology and international relations. Technology in Society, 27, 295-313.
33. Yakushiji, T 2009. The potential of science and technology diplomacy. Asia-Pacific Review, 16, 1-7.