Molecular Phylogenetics and character evolution of Cannabaceae

Taxon

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 473-485

  Yang, Mei Qing ^a,b   van Velzen, Robin ^c   Bakker, Freek T ^c   Sattarian, Ali ^d   Li, De Zhu ^a   Yi, Ting Shuang ^a  

^a KUNMING INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d Gonbad University   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cannabaceae; Character evolution; Classification; Molecular phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; CLASSIFICATION; DICOTYLEDON; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; RECONSTRUCTION; TAXONOMY; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

APHANANTHE; CANNABACEAE; GIRONNIERA; LOZANELLA; PARASPONIA;

EID: 84879261577     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12705/623.9     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alaniya, M., Kavtaradze, N.S., Skhirtladze, A., Pizza, C. & Pia-cente, S. 2010. Flavonol glycoside from Humulus lupulus. Chem. Nat. Compounds 46: 641-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 07/s1060 0- 010-9699-x
2. Alfaro, M.E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phy-logenetic confidence. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 255-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028
3. Baker, H. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24: 177-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1959.024.01.019
4. Becking, J. 1983. The Parasponia parviflora-Rhizobium symbiosis: Host specificity, growth and nitrogen fixation under various conditions. Pl. & Soil 75: 309-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02369969
5. Behnke, H.D. 1989. Sieve-element plastids, phloem proteins, and the evolution of flowering plants. IV. Hamamelidae. Pp. 105-128 in: Crane, P.R. & Blackmore, S. (eds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, Lower Hamamelidae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Bollback, J. 2006. SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. B. M. C. Bioinf. 7: 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-88
7. Brown, J.M. & Lemmon, A.R. 2007. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 56: 643-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150701546249
8. Chai, X.Y., Chen, S.L. & Xu, W. 2010. Using inter-simple sequence repeat markers to analyze the genetic structure of natural Pteroceltis tatarinowii populations and implications for species conservation. Pl. Syst. Evol. 285: 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0256-7
9. Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., Morgan, D., Les, D.H., Mishler, B.D., Duvall, M.R., Price, R.A., Hills, H.G., Qiu, Y.L., Kron, K.A., Rettig, J.H., Conti, E., Palmer, J.D., Manhart, J.R., Sytsma, K.J., Michaels, H.J., Kress, W.J., Karol, K.G., Clark, W.D., Hedren, M., Gaut, B.S., Jansen, R.K., Kim, K.J., Wimpee, C.F., Smith, J.F., Furnier, G.R., Strauss, S.H., Xiang, Q.Y., Plunkett, G.M., Soltis, P.S., Swensen, S.M., Williams, S.E., Gadek, P.A., Quinn, C.J., Eguiarte, L.E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G.H., Graham, S.W., Barrett, S.C.H., Dayanandan, S. & Albert, V.A. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2399846
10. Chiang, T.Y., Schaal, B.A. & Peng, C.I. 1998. Universal primers for amplification and sequencing a noncoding spacer between the atpB and rbcL genes of chloroplast DNA. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 39: 245-250.
11. Clark, M.N. 1978. A study of infraspecific flavonoid variation of Can-nabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae). Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Van couver, Canada.
12. Doyle, J. & Doyle, J. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer. 19: 11-15.
13. Engler, A. & Prantl, K. 1893. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 3. Berlin: Bornträger.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408678
15. Fu, L., Xin, Y. & Whittemore, A. 2003. Ulmaceae. Pp. 1-19 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. & Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 5. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
16. Giannasi, D.E. 1978. Generic relationships in Ulmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. Taxon 27: 331-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1220369
17. Grudzinskaya, I.A. 1967. Ulmaceae and reasons for distinguishing Celtidoideae as a separate family Celtidaceae Link. Bot. Zhurn. S.S.S.R. 5 2: 172-349.
18. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J.P. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52: 131-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150390192780
19. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F. & Dono-ghue, M.J. 2008. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach, 3rd ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
20. Killip, E.P. & Morton, C.V. 1931. The genus Lozanella. J. Washington Acad. Sci. 21: 336-339.
21. Kuprianova, A. 1962. Palynological data and the systematics of the Fagales and Urticales. Pp. 17-25 in: Sladkov, A.N. (ed.), Reports of Soviet Palinologists for the First International Conference on Palinology (Tucson, USA). Moskow: Publishing House of USSR Academy of Sciences.
22. Li, X.H., Shao, J.W., Lu, C., Zhang, X.P. & Qiu, Y.X. 2012. Chloro-plast phylogeography of a temperate tree Pteroceltis tatarinowii (Ulmaceae) in China. J. Syst. Evol. 50: 325-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.175 9- 6 8 31. 2 01 2. 0 0 2 0 3. x
23. Link, H.F. 1829. Handbuch zur Erkennung der nutzbarsten und am häufigsten vorkommenden Gewächse, vol. 2, Berlin: in der Haude und Spenerschen Buchhandlung.
24. Mabberley, D.J. 2008. Mabberley's plant-book: A portable dictionary of plants, their classification and uses. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2010. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.74. University of British Columbia & Oregon State University. http://mesquiteproject.org
26. Manchester, S.R., Chen, Z.D., Lu, A.M. & Uemura, K. 2009. Eastern Asian endemic seed plant genera and their paleogeographic history throughout the Northern Hemisphere. J. Syst. Evol. 47: 1-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00001.x
27. Oginuma, K., Raven, P.H. & Tobe, H. 1990. Karyomorphology and relationships of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). Bot. Mag. (To kyo) 103: 113-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02489620
28. Omori, Y. & Terabayashi, S. 1993. Gynoecial vascular anatomy and its systematic implications in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). J. Pl. Res. 106: 249-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02344593
29. Oxelman, B., Liden, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast r p s16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0 0987959
30. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. B. M. C. Bioinf. 14: 817-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
31. R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
32. Rambaut, A. 2002. Sequence alignment editor, version 2.0a11. Oxford: University of Oxford. http://evolve.zoo.ac.uk
33. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. 2004. Tracer, version 1.3. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
34. Rendle, A.B. 1925. The classification of flowering plants, vol. 2, London: Cambridge University Press.
35. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylo-genetic inference under mixed models. B. M. C. Bioinf. 19: 1572-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
36. Sattarian, A. & Van der Maesen, L.J.G. 2006. Endocarp morphology of African Celtis (Celtidaceae/Ulmaceae). Blumea 51: 389-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651906X622337
37. Sattarian, A., Van den Berg, R.G. & Van der Maesen, L.J.G. 2006. Pollen morphology of African Celtis (Celtidaceae). Feddes Repert. 117: 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 02/fed r.200611087
38. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51: 492-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150290 069913
39. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 2001. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. B. M. C. Bioinf. 17: 1246-1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246
40. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369
41. Soepadmo, E. 1977. Ulmaceae. Pp. 31-76 in: Van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.), Flora Malesiana, ser. 1, vol. 8. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff
42. Song, B. & Li, F.Z. 2002. The utility of trnK intron 5' region in phylogenetic analysis of Ulmaceae s. l. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 40: 125-132.
43. Song, B.H., Wang, X.Q., Li, F.Z. & Hong, D.Y. 2001. Further evidence for paraphyly of the Celtidaceae from the chloroplast gene matK. Pl. Syst. Evol. 228: 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s006060170041
44. Sturms, R., Kakar, S., Trent, J., III & Hargrove, M.S. 2010. Trema and Parasponia hemoglobins reveal convergent evolution of oxygen transport in plants. Biochemistry 49: 4085-4093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi1002844
45. Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
46. Sytsma, K. J., Morawetz, J., Pires, J.C., Nepokroeff, M., Conti, E., Zjhra, M., Hall, J.C. & Chase, M.W. 2002. Urticalean rosids: Circumscription, rosid ancestry, and phylogenetics based on rbcL, trnL-trnF, and ndhF sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1531-1546. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.9.1531
47. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00037152
48. Takahashi, M. 1989. Pollen morphology of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae: A reinvestigation. Pp. 253-265 in: Crane, PR. & Blackmore, S. (e ds.), Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamel-idae, vol. 2, Higher Hamamelidae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Takaso, T. 1987. Ovule ontogeny and morphology in Ulmaceae. Pp. 220 in: Greuter, W., Zimmer, B. & Behnke, H.D. (eds.), Abstracts, XIV International Botanical Congress. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
50. Takaso, T. & Tobe, H. 1990. Seed coat morphology and evolution in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 103: 25-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02488408
51. Terabayashi, S. 1991. Vernation patterns in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales), and their evolutionary and systematic implications. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 104: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02493399
52. The Plant List 2010. Version 1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed 20 Mar. 2013).
53. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Hig-gins, D.G. 1997. The CLUSTALX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
54. Todzia, C.A. 1993. Ulmaceae. Pp. 603-611 in: Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G. & Bittrich, V. (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2. Berlin: Springer.
55. Ueda, K., Kosuge, K. & Tobe, H. 1997. A molecular phylogeny of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales) based on rbcL nucleotide sequences. J. Pl. Res. 110: 171-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02509305
56. Van Velzen, R., Bakker, F.T., Sattarian, A. & Van der Maesen, L.J.G. 2006. Evolutionary relationships of Celtidaceae. Pp. 7-30 in: Sattarian, A. (ed.), Contribution to the biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with special emphasis on the African species. Dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
57. Wang, H.C., Moore, M.J., Soltis, P.S., Bell, C.D., Brockington, S.F., Alexandre, R., Davis, C.C., Latvis, M., Manchester, S.R. & Soltis, D.E. 2009. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 3853-3858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813376106
58. Weyland, H. 1937. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der rheinischen Tertiärflora. II. Erste Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zur Flora der Blätter-kohle und des Polierschiefers von Rott im Siebengebirge. Palaeon-tographica, Abt. B, Paläophytol. 83: 67-122.
59. Wiegrefe, S.J., Sytsma, K.J. & Guries, R.P. 1998. The Ulmaceae, one family or two? Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Pl. Syst. Evol. 210: 249-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985671
60. Yesson, C., Russell, S.J., Parrish, T., Dalling, J.W. & Garwood, N.C. 2004. Phylogenetic framework for Tre ma (Celtidaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 248: 85-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s0 0606- 00 4- 0186-3
61. Zavada, M.S. & Dilcher, D.L. 1986. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 348-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2399117
62. Zavada, M.S. & Kim, M. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of Ulmaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 200: 13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984745
63. Zhang, S., Soltis, D.E., Yang, Y., Li, D. & Yi, T. 2011. Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales. Molec. Phylo-gen. Evol. 60: 21-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.y mpev.2011.0 4.008
64. Zhou, Z. & Bartholomew, B. 2003. Cannabaceae. Pp. 74-75 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven & P.H., Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 5. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
65. Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, U.S.A.