Phylogenetic analysis of Ulmaceae

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 200, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 13-20

  Zavada, Michael S ^a   Kim, Muyeol ^b  

^a PROVIDENCE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Phylogenetic analysis; Ulmaceae, Moraceae, Barbeyaceae, Cannabaceae

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001914008     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00984745     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BATE-SMITH, E. C., RICHENS, R. E., 1973: Flavonoid chemistry and taxonomy in Ulmus. - Biochem. Syst, 1: 141-146.
2. BEHNKE, H.-D., 1973: Sieve-tube plastids of Hamamelididae. - Taxon 22: 205-210.
3. _ 1989: Sieve element plasitds, phloem proteins, and the evolution of flowering plants. IV. Hamamelidae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. 1: Introduction and "Lower" Hamamelidae, pp. 105-128. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40A. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. BERG, C. C., 1977: Urticales, their differentiation and systematic position. - Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 1: 349-374.
5. _ 1989: Systematic and phylogeny of the Urticales. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: Higher Hamamelidae, pp. 193-220. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40B. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. BESSEY, C. E., 1915: The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2: 109-164.
7. BURGER, W., 1977: Ulmaceae. - In BURGER, W., (Ed.): Flora costaricensis. - Fieldiana Bot. 40: 83-93.
8. CHERNIK, V. V., 1975: Arrangement and reduction of perianth and androecium pans in representatives of the Ulmaceae MIRBEL and Celtidaceae LINK. - Bot. Žurn. 60: 1561-1573.
9. CRAWFORD, D. J., 1978: Flavonoid chemistry and angiosperm evolution. - Bot. Rev. 44: 431-156.
10. CRONQUIST, A., 1968: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. - New York: New York Botanical Garden.
11. _ 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. - New York: Columbia University Press.
12. FAHN, A., 1982: Plant anatomy. - Oxford: Pergamon Press.
13. GENTRY, A. H., 1983: Plagioceltis (Ulmaceae) - A superfluous genus. - Taxon 32: 460-461.
14. GIANNASI, D. E., 1978: Generic relationships in the Ulmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. - Taxon 27: 331-344.
15. _ 1986: Phytochemical aspects of phylogeny in Hamamelidae. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 417-437.
16. GOLDBLATT, P., 1981: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975-1978. - St. Louis: Missouri Bot. Gard.
17. GORNALL, R. J., BOHM, B. A., 1978: Angiosperm flavonoid evolution: a reappraisal. - Syst. Bot. 3: 353-368.
18. GRUDZINSKAYA, I. A., 1967: The Ulmaceae and reasons for distinguishing the Celtidoideae as a separate family Celtidaceae LINK. - Bot. Žurn. 52: 1723-1749.
19. HARBORNE, J. B., 1977: Flavonoids and the evolution of angiosperms. - Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 5: 722.
20. HICKEY, L. J., 1973: Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. - Amer. J. Bot. 60: 17-33.
21. _ 1979: A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. - In METCALFE, C. R., CHALK, L., (Eds): Anatomy of dicotyledons 1, pp. 25-39. - 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. _ WOLFE, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 538-589.
23. _ TAYLOR, D. W., 1991: The leaf architecture of Ticodendron and the application of foliar characters in discerning its relationships. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 105-130.
24. HUFFORD, L. D., CRANE, P. R., 1989: A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the 'lower' Hamamelidae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 1: introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, pp. 175-192. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40A. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. HUMPHRIES, C. J., BLACKMORE, S., 1989: A review of the classification of the Moraceae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematic and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: Higher Hamamelidae, pp. 267-277. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40B. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. HUTCHINSON, J., 1967: The genera of flowering plants. 2. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. JUDD, W. S., SANDERS, R. W., DONOGHUE, M. J., 1994: Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. - Harvard Papers Bot. 5: 1-51.
28. LEROY, J.-F., 1961: Un deuxième Aphananthe (Ulmacee) du Mexique. - J. Agricult. Trop. Bot. Appl. 8: 72-74.
29. MANCHESTER, S. R., 1989: Systematics and fossil history of the Ulmaceae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: Higher Hamamelidae, pp. 221-251. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40B. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. MAUSETH, J. D., 1988: Plant anatomy. - Redwood City. CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
31. MEHRA, P. N., GILL, B. S., 1974: Cytological studies in Ulmaceae, Moraceae, and Urticaceae. - J. Arnold Arbor. 55: 663-677.
32. MORAWETZ, W., SAMUEL, M. R. A., 1989: Karyological patterns in the Hamamelidae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 1: Introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, pp. 129-154. -Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40A. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. MULLER, J., 1981: Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. - Bot. Rev. 47: 1-142.
34. OGINUMA, K., RAVEN, P. H., TOBE, H., 1990: Karyomorphology and relationships of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 103: 113-131.
35. POLHILL, R. M., 1966: Ulmaceae. - In HUBBARD, C. E., MILNE-REDHEAD, E., (Eds): Flora of Tropical East Africa. - London: Whitefriars Press.
36. RAVEN, P. H., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phytogeny: cytology. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 724-764.
37. SOEPADMO, E., 1977: Ulmaceae. - Flora Malesiana, ser. 1, 8: 31-76.
38. SWEITZER, E. M., 1971: Comparative anatomy of Ulmaceae. - J. Arnold Arbor. 52: 523-585.
39. SWOFFORD, D., 1989: PAUP - Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 3.1. - Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.
40. TAKAHASHI, M., 1989: Pollen morphology of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae: a reinvestigation. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. 2: Higher Hamamelidae, pp. 253-265. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40B. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41. TAKASO, T., 1987: Ovule ontogeny and morphology in Ulmaceae. - XIV Internat. Bot. Cong., Berlin, Abstracts, p. 220.
42. _ TOBE, H., 1990: Seed coat morphology and evolution in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 103: 25-41.
43. TERABAYASHI, S., 1991: Vernation patterns in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales), and their evolutionary and systematic implications. - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 104: 1-13.
44. WALKER, J. W., DOYLE, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 664-723.
45. WOLFE, J. A., DOYLE, J. A., PAGE, V. M., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: paleobotany. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 801-824.
46. ZAVADA, M., 1983: Pollen morphology of Ulmaceae. - Grana 22: 23-30.
47. _ CREPET, W. L., 1981: Investigations of angiosperme from the Middle Eocene of North America: flowers of the Celtidoideae. - Amer. J. Bot. 68: 924-933.
48. _ DILCHER, D. L., 1986: Comparative pollen morphology and its relationships to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelididae. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 348-381.