The Ulmaceae, one family or two? Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 210, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 249-270

  Wiegrefe, Susan J ^a   Sytsma, Kenneth J ^b   Guries, Raymond P ^b  

^a MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Chloroplast DNA, cladistics, restriction site mapping; Ulmaceae, Celtidaceae, Urticales, Cannabis

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; CHROMOSOME; ENZYME ANALYSIS; FRUIT; LEAF VENATION; MOLECULAR MAPPING; SEED MORPHOLOGY;

AMPELOCERA; APHANANTHE; CANNABACEAE; CANNABIS; EMBRYOPHYTA; HAMAMELIDIDAE; MORACEAE; ROSALES; ULMACEAE;

EID: 0031801628     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00985671     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. ALBERT, V. A., MISHLER, B. D., CHASE, M. W., 1992: Character-state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with an example from chloroplast DNA. - In SOLTIS, P. S., SOLTIS, D. E., DOYLE, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 369-403. - New York: Chapman & Hall.
2. BAUM, D. A., SYTSMA, K. J., HOCH, P. C., 1994: The phylogeny of Epilobium L. (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. - Syst. Bot. 19: 363-388.
3. BEHNKE, H.-D., 1989: Sieve-element plastids, phloem proteins, and the evolution of flowering plants. IV. Hamamelidae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: 'Higher' Hamamelidae. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40-A, pp. 105-128. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. BERG, C. C., 1977: Urticales, their differentiation and systematic position. - Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 1: 349-374.
5. -1989: Systematics and phylogeny of the Urticales. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: 'Higher' Hamamelidae. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40-B, pp. 193-220. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. BREMER, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. - Evolution 42: 795-803.
7. CHASE, M. W., SOLTIS, D. E., OLMSTEAD, R. G., MORGAN. D., LES, D. H., MISHLER, B. D., DUVALL, M. R., PRICE, R. A., HILLS, H. G. QIU, Y., KRON, K. A., RETTIG, J. H., CONTI, E., PALMER, J. D., MANHART, J. R., SYTSMA, K. J., MICHAELS, H. J., KRESS, W. J., KAROL, K. G., CLARK, W. D., HEDRÉN, M., GAUT, B. S., JANSEN, R. K., KIM, K.-J., WIMPEE, C. F., SMITH, J. F., FURNIER, G. R., STRAUSS, S. H., XIANG, Q.-Y., PLUNKETT, G. M., SOLTIS, P. S., SWENSEN, S. M., WILLIAMS, S. E., GADEK, P. A., QUINN, C. J., EGUIARTE, L. E., GOLENBERG, E., LEARN, G. H., GRAHAM, S. W., BARRETT, S. C. H., DAYANANDAN, S., ALBERT, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
8. CHERNIK, V. V., 1975: Arrangements and reduction of perianth and androecium parts in representatives of Ulmaceae MIRBEL and Celtidaceae LINK. - Bot. Zhurn. (Leningrad) 60: 1561-1573.
9. -1980: Peculiarities of structure and development of the pericarp of the representatives of the family Ulmaceae and Celtidaceae. - Bot. Zhurn. (Leningrad) 65: 521-531.
10. CRONQUIST, A., 1981: An integrated system of classificanon of flowering plants. - New York: Columbia University Press.
11. -1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2nd edn. - Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden.
12. DAHLGREN, R., 1983: General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. -Nordic J. Bot. 3: 119-149.
13. DONOGHUE, M. J., OLMSTEAD, R. G., SMITH, J. F., PALMER, J. D., 1992: Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 333-345.
14. -SANDERSON, M. J., 1992: The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. - In SOLTIS, P. S., SOLTIS, D. E., DOYLE, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 340-268. - New York: Chapman & Hall.
15. ENGLER, A., PRANTL, K., 1893: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 3. - Berlin: Bornträger.
16. ERDTMAN, G., 1971: Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. - New York: Hafner.
17. FARRIS, J. S., 1970: Methods for computing Wagner trees. - Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
18. -1989: The retention index and homoplasy excees. - Syst. Zool. 38: 406-407.
19. FELSENTEIN, J., 1978: Cases in which parsimony or compatibility will be positively misleading. - Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
20. -1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: and approach using the bootstrap. - Syst. Zool. 39: 783-791.
21. -1992: PHYLIP manual version 3.4. - Berkeley: University of California Herbarium.
22. GIANNISI, D. E., 1978: Generic relationships in the Ulmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. - Taxon 27: 331-344.
23. GIVNISH, T. J., 1987: Comparative studies of leaf form: assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. - New Phytol. 106, Suppl.: 131-160.
24. -SYSTSMA, K. J., 1997a: Homoplasy in molecular vs. morphological data: the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. - In GIVNISH, T. J., SYTSMA, K. J., (Eds): Molecular evolution and adaptive radation. - New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. _ _ 1997b: Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. -Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 7: 320-333.
26. GRUDZINSKAYA, I. A., 1967: Ulmaceae and reasons for distinguishing Celtidoideae as a separate family Celtidaceae Link. - Bot. Zhurn. (Leningrad) 52: 1723-1749.
27. GUNTER, L. E., KOCHERT, G., GIANNASI, D. E., 1994: Phylogenetic relationships of the Juglandaceae. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 192: 11-29.
28. HOLSINGER, K. E., JANSEN, R. K., 1993: Phylogenetic analysis of restriction site data. -Meth. Enzymol 224: 23-37.
29. HUFFORD, L., 1992: Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 218-248.
30. HUMPHRIES, C. J., BLACKMORE, S., 1989: A review of the classification of the Moraceae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: 'Higher' Hamamelidae. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40-B, pp. 267-277. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. HUTCHINSON, J., 1967: The genera of flowering plants. 2. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. JANSEN, R. K., MICHAELS, H. J., WALLACE, R. S., KIM, K. -J., KEELEY, S. C., WATSON, L. E., PALMER, J. D., 1992: Chloroplast DNA variation in the Asteraceae: phylogenetic and evolutionary implications. - In SOLTIS, P. S., SOLTIS, D. E., DOYLE, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 252-279. - New York: Chapman & Hall.
33. PALMER, J. D., 1988: Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). - Amer. J. Bot. 75: 753-766.
34. JUDD, W. S., SANDERS, R. W., DONOGHUE, M. J., 1994: Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. - Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 1-51.
35. KLOTZSCH, J. F., 1847: Beiträge zu einer Flora der Aequinoctial-Gegenden der Neuen Welt. - Linnaea 20: 337-542.
36. KLUGE, A. G., FARRIS, J. S., 1969: Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. -Syst. Zool. 18: 1-32.
37. KUPRIANOVA, L. A., 1962: [Palynological data for the systematics of the orders Fagales and Urticales.] k pervoi mezhdunarodnoi palinologicheskoi konferentsii doklady sovetskikh palinologov. - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Palynology 1962, Tucson, AZ, pp. 17-25 (In Russian).
38. LINDLEY, J., 1853: The vegetable kingdom. 3rd edn. - London: Bradbury & Evans.
39. LINK, D. H. F., 1831: Handbuch zur Erkennung der nutzbarsten und am häufigsten vorkommenden Gewächse 2. - Berlin: Haude & Spener.
40. MABBERELY, D. J., 1987: The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the higher plants. -Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. MADDISON, W. P., MADDISON, D. R., 1992: MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. - Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
42. MANCHESTER, S. R., 1989: Systematics and fossil history of the Ulmaceae. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: 'Higher' Hamamelidae. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40-B, pp. 221-251. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43. MEHRA, P. N., GILL, R. S., 1974: Cytological studies in Ulmaceae, Moraceae and Urticaceae. - J. Arnold Arbor. 55: 663-677.
44. MIRBEL, C. F., 1815: Éléments de physiologie végétale et de botanique. - Paris: Magimel.
45. NEI, M., LI, W. -H., 1979: Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5269-5273.
46. -TAJIMA, F., 1985: Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference for man and apes. - Molec. Biol. Evol. 2: 189-205.
47. OGINUMA, K., RAVEN, P., TOBE, H., 1990: Karyomorphology and relationships of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 103: 113-131.
48. OLMSTEAD, R. G., PALMER, J. D., 1992: A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Solanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 346-360.
49. _ _ 1994: Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. - Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1205-1224.
50. -SWEERE, J. A., 1994: Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. - Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
51. OMORI, Y., TERABAYASHI, S., 1993: Gynoecial vascular anatomy and its systematic implications in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). - J. Pl. Res. 106: 249-258.
52. PALMER, J. D., JANSEN, R. K., MICHELS, H. J., CHASE, M. W., MANHART, J. R., 1988: Chloroplast DNA variation and plant phylogeny. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: 1180-1206.
53. PLANCHON, J. -E., 1873: Ulmaceae. - In CANDOLLE, A. P. DE, (Ed.): Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. 17. - Paris: Truettel & Würtz.
54. RAVEN, P. H., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 724-764.
55. SAITOU, N., NEI, M., 1987: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing evolutionary trees. - Molec. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
56. SANDERSON, M. J., 1989: Confidence limits in phylogenies: the bootstrap revisited. -Cladistics 5: 113-129.
57. -DONOGHUE, M. J., 1989: Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. - Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
58. SHINOZAKI, K., OHME, M., TANAKA, M., & al., 1986: The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. - EMBO J. 5: 2043-2049.
59. SMITH, J. F., SYTSMA, K. J., SMITH, R. S., SHOEMAKER, J. S., 1992: A qualitative comparison of total cellular DNA extraction protocols. - Phytochem. Bull. 23: 2-9.
60. SMITH, R. L., SYTSMA, K. J., 1990: Evolution of Populus nigra (sect. Aigeiros): introgressive hybridization and the chloroplast contribution of Populus alba (sect. Populus). - Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1176-1187.
61. SWEITZER, E. M., 1971: Comparative anatomy of Ulmaceae. - J. Arnold Arbor. 52. 523-585.
62. SWOFFORD, D., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. -Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
63. SYTSMA, K. J., CONTI, E., NEPOKROEFF, M., PIRES, J. C., QIU, Y.-L., CHASE, M. W., 1996: Urticales: rbcL sequences clarify placement in Rosidae, composition, and familial relationships. - Amer. J. Bot. 83 (Suppl. 6): 197.
64. -GOTTLIEB, L. D., 1986: Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia section Peripetasma (Onagraceae). - Evolution 40: 1248-1261.
65. -HAHN, W. J., 1994: Molecular systematics: 1991-1993. - Progr. Bot. 55: 307-333.
66. _ _ 1996: Molecular systematics: 1994-1995. - Progr. Bot. 58: 470-499.
67. -SCHAAL, B. A., 1985: Phylogenetics of Lisianthius skinneri (Gentianaceae) species complex in Panama utilizing DNA restriction fragment analysis. - Evolution 39: 594-608.
68. TAKAHASHI, M., 1989: Pollen morphology of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae; a reinvestigation. - In CRANE, P. R., BLACKMORE, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 2: 'Higher' Hamamelidae. - Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol. 40-B, pp. 253-265. - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69. TAKASO, T., 1987: Ovule ontogeny and morphology in Ulmaceae. - In GREUTER, W., ZIMMER, B., BEHNKE, H.-D., (Eds): Abstracts, XIV International Botanical Congress, Berlin (West), Germany, p. 220. - Berlin.
70. -TOBE, H., 1990: Seed coat morphology and evolution in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 103: 25-41.
71. TERABAYASHI, S., 1991: Vernation patterns in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales), and their evolutionary and systematic implications. - Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 104: 1-13.
72. THORNE, R. F., 1968: Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. - Aliso 6: 75-76.
73. -1983: Proposed new realignments in angiosperms. - Nordic J. Bot. 3: 85-117.
74. -1992: An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. - Aliso 13: 365-389.
75. TIPPO, O., 1938: Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. - Bot. Gaz. 100: 1-99.
76. TODZIA, C. A., 1989: A revision of Ampelocera (Ulmaceae). - Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 1087-1102.
77. WATROUS, L. E., WHEELER, Q. D., 1981: The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. - Syst. Zool. 30: 1-11.
78. WIEGREFE, S. J., SYTSMA, K. J., GURIES, R. P., 1994: Phylogeny of elms (Ulmus, Ulmaceae): molecular evidence for a sectional classification. - Syst. Bot. 19: 590-612.
79. WILLIS, J. C., 1966: A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, 2nd edn. (Revised by H. K. AIRY SHAW). - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. ZAVADA, M. S., 1983: Pollen morphology of Ulmaceae. - Grana 22: 23-30.
81. -CREPET, W. L., 1981: Investigation of angiosperms from the Eocene of North America: flowers of the Celtidoideae. - Amer J. Bot. 68: 924-933.
82. ZHONG, Y., BAAS, P., WHEELER, E. A., 1992: Wood anatomy of trees and shrubs from China. IV. Ulmaceae. - I.A.W.A. Bull. n.s. 13: 419-453.