A molecular phylogeny of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales) based on rbcL nucleotide sequences

Journal of Plant Research

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 171-178

  Ueda, Kunihiko ^a   Kosuge, Keiko ^b   Tobe, Hiroshi ^c  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Celtidaceae; Molecular phytogeny; rbcL; Ulmaceae; Urticales

Indexed keywords

AMPELOCERA; MORACEAE; ROSALES; ULMACEAE;

EID: 0031285930     PISSN: 09189440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02509305     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albert, V.A., Chase, M.W. and Mishler, B.D. 1993. Character state weighting for cladistic analysis of protein-coding DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 752-766.
2. Adachi, J. and Hasegawa, M. 1994. MOLPHY ver. 2.2. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
3. Bousquet, J., Strauss, S.H. and Li, P. 1992. Complete congruence between morphological and rbcL-based molecular phylogenies in birches and related species (Betulaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 9: 1076-1088.
4. Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., Morgan, D., Les, D.H., Mishler, B.D., Duvall, M.R., Price, R.A., Hills, H.G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K.A., Rettig, J.H., Conti, E., Palmer, J.D., Manhart, J.R., Sytsma, K.J., Michaels, H.J., Kress, W.J., Karol, K.G., Clark, W.D., Hedroen, M., Gaut, B.S., Jansen, R.K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C.F., Smith, J.F., Furnier, G.R., Strauss, S.H., Xiang, Q.-Y., Plunkett, G.M., Soltis, P.S., Swensen, S., Williams, S.E., Gadek, P.A., Quinn, C.J., Eguiarte, L.E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G.H.Jr., Graham, S.W., Barrett, S.C., Dayanandan, S. and Albert, V.A. 1993. DNA sequence phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
5. Chernik, V.V. 1981. Pseudomonomeric gynoecium of the Ulmaceae and Celtidaceae representatives. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 66: 958-966 (In Russian).
6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
7. Cronquist, A. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. 2nd ed. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1995. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.56c. University of Washington, Seattle.
9. Frascaria, N., Maggia, L., Michaud, M. and Bousquet, J. 1993. The rbcL gene sequence from chestnut indicates a slow rate of evolution in the Fagaceae. Genome 36: 668-671.
10. Giannasi, D.E. 1978. Generic relationships in the Ulmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. Taxon 27: 331-344.
11. Grudzinskaya, I.A. 1967. Ulmaceae and reasons for distinguishing Celtidoideae as a separate family Celtidaceae Link. Bot. Zhurn. 52: 1723-1748 (In Russian with English summary).
12. Gunter, L.E., Kochert, G. and Giannasi, D.E. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the Juglandaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 192: 11-29.
13. Hasebe, M., Ito, M., Kofuji, R., Iwatsuki, K. and Ueda, K. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships in Gnetophyta deduced from rbcL gene sequences. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 105: 385-391.
14. Higgins, D.G. 1994. ClustalW. EMBL, Heidelberg.
15. Martin, P.G. and Dowd, J.M. 1993. Using sequences of rbcL to study phylogeny and biogeography of Nothofagus species. Aust. Syst. Bot. 6: 441-447.
16. Morgan, D.R., Soltis, D.E. and Robertson, K.R. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890-903.
17. Oginuma, K., Raven, P.H. and Tobe, H. 1990. Karyomorphology and relationships of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). Bot. Mag. Tokyo 103: 113-131.
18. Oginuma, K. and Tobe, H. 1995. Karyomorphology of some Moraceae and Cecropiaceae (Urticales). J. Plant Res. 108: 313-326.
19. Omori, Y. and Terabayashi, S. 1993. Gynoecial vascular anatomy and its systematic implications in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). J. Plant Res. 106: 249-258.
20. Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M.W., Les, D.H., Hills, H.G. and Parks, C.R. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: a cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 587-606.
21. Sharp, A.J. 1958. Mirandaceltis, a new genus from Mexico (1). Bol. Soc. Bot. Mex. 23: 38-42.
22. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Clegg, M.T. and Durbin, M. 1990. rbcL sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 4640-4644.
23. Sotis, D.E., Morgan, D.R., Grable, A., Soltis, P.A. and Kuzoff, R. 1993. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1056-1081.
24. Sytsma, K.J., Conti, E., Nepokroeff, M., Pires, J.C., Qiu, Y-L. and Chase, M.W. 1996. Urticales: rbcL sequences clarify placement in Rosidae, composition, and familial relationships (Abstract no. 562). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 197.
25. Sweitzer, E.M. 1971. Comparative anatomy of the Ulmaceae. J. Arnold Arb. 52: 523-585.
26. Swofford, D.L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogentic Analysis Using Parsimony, ver. 3.1.1. The Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
27. Takahashi, M. 1989. Pollen morphology of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae: a reinvestigation. In P.R. Crane and S. Blackmore, eds., Evolution, Systematics, and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 253-265.
28. Takaso, T. and Tobe, H. 1990. Seed coat morphology and evolution in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales). Bot. Mag. Tokyo 103: 25-41.
29. Terabayashi, S. 1991. Vernation patterns in Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales), and their evolutionary and systematic implications. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 104: 1-13.
30. Thorne, R.F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
31. Ueda, K., Kosuge, K. and Tobe, H. 1994. Systematic position of Ulmaceae and Celtidaceae, and their generic relationships (Abstract no. 3aA7). Proc. 58th Ann. Meet. Bot. Soc. Jpn.: 292 (in Japanese).
32. Webb, D.M. and Knapp, S.J. 1990. DNA extraction from a previously recalcitrant plant genus. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 8: 180-185.