Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 101-114

  Milenković, Jana ^a   Hertl, Kristijana ^b   Košir, Andrej ^c   Žibert, Janez ^d   Tasič, Jurij Franc ^a,c  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Slovenia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^d Faculty of Health Sciences   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis; Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Mass breast lesions; Spatial variation of temporal enhancements

Indexed keywords

BREAST LESION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; EARLY DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER; GREY-LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIXES; LEAST SQUARES SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; MINIMUM-DISTANCE CLASSIFIER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATIONS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; EXPERIMENTS; LOGISTICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADENOMYOEPITHELIOMA; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST ADENOMA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84878113838     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: 18732860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Breast imaging atlas. American college of radiology 2003.
2. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001, 220:13-30.
3. Piccoli C.W. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity. European Radiology 1997, 7:281-288.
4. Stoutjesdijk M.J., Fütterer J.J., Boetes C., van Die L.E., Jager G., Barentsz J.O. Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology 2005, 40:355-362.
5. Chan H.P., Sahiner B., Helvie M.A., Petrick N., Roubidoux M.A., Wilson T.E., Adler D.D., Paramagul C., Newman J.S., Sanjay-Gopal S. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999, 212:817-827.
6. Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D., van der Sluis R.F., van Erning L.J., Hendriks J.H., Holland R., Ruys S.H. MR characterisation of suspicious breast lesion with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994, 193:777-781.
7. Gilles R., Guinebretière J.M., Lucidarme O., Cluzel P., Janaud G., Finet J.F., Tardivon A., Masselot J., Vanel D. Nonpalpable breast tumours: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994, 191:625-631.
8. Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989, 170:681-686.
9. Stack J.P., Redmond O.M., Codd M.B., Dervan P.A., Ennis J.T. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990, 174:491-494.
10. Chen W., Giger M.L. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamic. Medical Physics 2004, 31:1076-1082.
11. Nattkemper T.W., Arnrich B., Lichte O., Timm W., Degenhard A., Pointon L., et al. Evaluation of radiological features for breast tumour classification in clinical screening with machine learning methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2005, 34:129-139.
12. Gibbs P., Turnbull L.W. Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2003, 50:92-98.
13. Chen W., Giger M.L., Li H., Bick U., Newstead G.M. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesion on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2007, 58:562-571.
14. Sinha S., Lucas-Quesada F.A., Debruhl N.D., Sayre J., Farria D., Gorczyca D.P., Bassett L.W. Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesion. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997, 7:1016-1026.
15. Nie K., Chen J.H., Yu H.J., Chu Y., Nalcioglu O., Su M.Y. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Academic Radiology 2008, 15:1513-1525.
16. Arbach L., Stolpen A., Reinhardt J.M. Classification of breast MRI lesions using a backpropagation neural network (BNN). Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro 2004, 253-256.
17. Chen W., Giger M.L., Bick U., Newstead G.M. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Medical Physics 2006, 33:2878-2887.
18. Warren R., Coulthard A. Breast MRI in practice 2002, Martin Dunitz, London.
19. Degani H., Gusis V., Weinstein D., Fields S., Strano S. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nature Medicine 1997, 3:780-782.
20. Agoston A.T., Daniel B.L., Herfkens R.J., Ikeda D.M., Birdwell R.L., Heiss S.G., Sawyer-Glover A.M. Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data. Radiographics 2001, 21:217-226.
21. Pediconi F., Catalano C., Venditti F., Ercolani M., Carotenuto L., Padula S., Moriconi E., Roselli A., Giacomelli L., Kirchin M.A., Passariello R. Color-coded automated signal intensity curves for detection and characterization of breast lesions: preliminary evaluation of a new software package for integrated magnetic resonance-based breast imaging. Investigative Radiology 2005, 40:448-457.
22. Mehnert A., Bengtsson E., McMahon K., Kennedy D., Wilson S., Crozier S. Visualisation of the pattern of contrast enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Proceedings of APRS workshop on digital image computing (WDIC2005) 2005, 67-72.
23. Zheng Y., Englander S., Schnall M.D., Shen D. STEP: spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis. Medical Physics 2009, 36:3192-3204.
24. Shannon S.C., Agner C., Soman S., Libfeld E., McDonald M., Thomas K., Englander S., Rosen M.A., Chin D., Nosher J., Madabhushi A. Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification. Journal of Digital Imaging 2011, 24:446-463.
25. Lee S.H., Kim J.H., Cho N., Park J.S., Yang Z., Jung Y.S., Woo Kyung Moon Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. Medical Physics 2010, 37:3940-3956.
26. Karahalioua A., Vassioub K., Skiadopoulosa S., Kanavouc T., Yiakoumelosa A., Costaridoua L. Quantifying heterogeneity of lesion uptake in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. Journal of Instrumentation 2009, 4.
27. Gal Y., Mehnert A., Bradley A., Kennedy D., Crozier S. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2011, 35:645-652.
28. Agliozzo S., Luca M.D., Bracco C., Vignati A., Giannini V., Martincich L., Carbonaro L.A., Bert A., Sardanelli F., Regge D. Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhances breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Medical Physics 2012, 34:1704-1715.
29. Karahaliou A., Vassiou K., Arikidis N.S., Skiadopoulos S., Kanavou T., Costaridou L. Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. British Journal of Radiology 2010, 83:296-309.
30. Baum F., Fischer U., Vosshenrich R., Grabbe E. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. European Radiology 2002, 12:1087-1092.
31. Vassiou K., Kanavou T., Vlychou M., Poultsidi A., Athanasiou E., Arvanitis D.L., Fezoulidis I.V. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. European Journal of Radiology 2009, 70(1):69-76.
32. Szabo B.K., Aspelin P., Wiberg M.K. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. Academic Radiology 2004, 11:1344-1354.
33. Collewet G., Strzelecki M., Mariette F. Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2004, 22(1):81-91.
34. Haralick R.M., Shanmugam K., Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3 1973, (6):610-621.
35. Galloway M.M. Texture analysis using grey-level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1975, 4:172-179.
36. Weszka J.S. A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-6 1976, (4):269-285.
37. Rekha G.R. Using multi-resolution features and SOM in ultrasound images for segmentation. IEEE international conference on recent trends in information technology (ICRTIT) 2011, 792-797.
38. Draper N., Smith H. Applied regression analysis 1981, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
39. Ahmed N., Rao K. Orthogonal transformations for digital-signal processing, least-squares mapping technique 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York.
40. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2004, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
41. Pelckmans K, Suykens JAK, Van Gestel T, De Brabanter J, Lukas L, Hamers B, et al., LS-SVMlab: A Matlab/C toolbox for least-squares support vector machines, available at. http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/lssvmlab.
42. Suykens J.A.K., Van Gestel T., De Brabanter De Moor J., Vandewalle J. Least-squares support vector machine 2002, World Scientific, Singapore.
43. Bouckaert R.R. Choosing between two learning algorithms based on calibrated tests. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning 2003, 51-58.
44. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006, 27:861-879.
45. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D.G. Pattern classification 2001, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
46. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory 1998, Wiley Interscience, New York.
47. Raza S., Vallejo M., Chikarmane S.A., Birdwell R.L. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008, 191:689-699.
48. Van den Bosch M.A., Daniel B.L., Mariano M.N., Nowels K.N., Birdwell R.L., Fong K.J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocistic change of the breast. Investigative Radiology 2005, 40:436-441.
49. Jansen S.A., Fan X., Karczmar G.S., Abe H., Schmidt R.A., Giger M.L., Newstead G.M. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement?. Medical Physics 2008, 35:3102-3109.
50. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging: Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007, 244:356-378.
51. Newell D., Nie K., Chen J.H., Hsu C.C., Yu H.J., Nalcioglu O., Su M.Y. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. European Radiology 2010, 20:771-781.