Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: Comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 69-76

  Vassiou, Katherine ^a   Kanavou, Theodorab ^a   Vlychou, Mariann ^a   Poultsidi, Antigoni ^a   Athanasiou, Evagelos ^a   Arvanitis, Dimitrios L ^a   Fezoulidis, Ioannis V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Breast; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tumor

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGIES; BI-RADS; BREAST; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST LESIONS; DATA SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES; DIAGNOSTIC METHODS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUES; HIGH RESOLUTIONS; KINETIC ANALYSIS; MULTI MODALS; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITIES; SURGICAL EXCISIONS; TRUE POSITIVES;

ACOUSTIC WAVES; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETISM; TUMORS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 63649123474     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schnall M.D. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to early detection of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 3 (2001) 17-21
2. Alexander F.E., Anderson T.J., Brown H.K., et al. Fourteen years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening. Lancet 353 (1999) 1903-1908
3. Saarenmaa I., Salminen T., Geiger U., et al. The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme. Eur J Cancer 35 (1999) 1118-1122
4. Patel M.R., and Whitman G.J. Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. Acad Radiol 5 (1998) 26-33
5. Weinreb J.C., and Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 196 (1995) 593-610
6. Boetes C., Mus R.D., Holland R., et al. Breast tumours: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197 (1995) 743-747
7. Rankin S.C. MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 806-818
8. Buchberger W., Niehoff A., Obrist P., De Koekkoek-Doll P., and Duenser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound, CT, MRI 21 (2000) 325-336
9. Kopans D.B., Meyer J.E., and Lindfers K.K. Wholebreast US imaging: four-year follow-up. Radiology 157 (1985) 505-507
10. Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., Dennis M.A., Parker S.H., and Sisney G.A. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196 (1995) 123-134
11. American College of Radiology (ACR): illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
12. Baum F., Fischer U., Vosshenrich R., and Grabbe E. Classification o hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12 (2002) 1087-1092
13. Julian T.B. MRI: a role in clinical trials. J Magn Reson Imaging 13 (2001) 837-841
14. Warner E., Lockwood G., Trichler D., and Boyd N.F. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prevent 16 (1992) 67-72
15. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., and Newhouse J.H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225 (2002) 165-175
16. Pain J., Ebbs S., Hern R., et al. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol 18 (1992) 44-48
17. Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Hahn D., Schmidt H., et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. JCAT 10 (1986) 199-204
18. Schelfout K., Van Goethem M., Kersschot E., et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. EJSO 30 (2004) 501-507
19. Orel S.G., and Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for detection, diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220 (2001) 3-30
20. Sardanelli F., Iozzelli A., Fausto A., Carriero A., and Kirchin M.A. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology 235 (2005) 791-797
21. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
22. Flamm C.R., Ziegler K.M., and Aronson N. Technology Evaluation Center assessment synopsis: use of magnetic resonance imaging to avoid a biopsy in women with suspicious primary breast lesions. J Am Coll Radiol 2 (2005) 485-487
23. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 (2004) 830-849
24. Lehmann C.D., Isaacs C., Schnall M.D., et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244 (2007) 381-388
25. Leung J.W.T., and Sickles E.A. The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 45 (2007) 773-789
26. Malur S., Wurdinger S., Moritz A., et al. Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 3 (2001) 55-60
27. Rissanen T., Tikkakoski T., Autio A.L., and Apaja-Sarkkinen M. Ultrasonography of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol 39 (1998) 285-291
28. Ikeda D.M., Baker D.R., and Daniel B.L. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: clinical indications and breast MRI reporting system. J Magn Reson Imaging 12 (2000) 975-983
29. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Kim C.M., et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR 180 (2003) 333-341
30. Slanetz P.J., Edmister W.B., Yeh E.D., Talete A.C., and Kopans D.B. Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 8 (2002) 145-148