Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1016-1026

  Sinha, Shantanu ^a   Lucas Quesada, Flora Anne ^a   DeBruhl, Nanette D ^a   Sayre, James ^a   Farria, Dionne ^a   Gorczyca, David P ^a   Bassett, Lawrence W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast, disease; Breast, MR; Diagnosis Computers; Diagnostic aid; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031403929     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070613     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR Imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196:115-122.
2. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR Imaging of the breast. Radiographics 1993; 13:247-267.
3. Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Nonmammographic breast Imaging techniques. Curr Opin Radiol 1992; 4:146-154.
4. Heywang S, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR Imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
5. Kaiser W, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686.
6. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off-resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlations. Radiology 1993; 187: 493-501.
7. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Li Volsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
8. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185:407-411.
9. Pierce W, Harms S, Flamig D, Griffey R, Evans W, Hagans J. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 1991; 181:757-763.
10. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:564-568.
11. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero L, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrences with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:473-478.
12. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
13. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis - correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1-8.
14. Heywang-Korunner SH. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:94-104.
15. Fobben ES. Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, Dembner AG, Seltzer MG, Santoro EJ. Breast MR imaging with commercially available technique: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:143-152.
16. Kilday J, Palmieri, Fox MD. Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993; 12(4):664-669.
17. Brzakovic D, Luo XM, Brzakovic P. An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1990; 9:233-241.
18. Adams AH, Brookeman JR, Merickel MB. Breast lesion discrimination using statistical analysis and shape measures on magnetic resonance imagery. Comput Med Imaging Graphics 1991; 15(5):339-349.
19. Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, Sinha S. Segmentation strategies for breast tumors from dynamic MR images. JMRI 1996; 6:753-763.
20. Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Speidel CM, Neumann LR, Rickma DL, Schertz LD. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) multispectral tissue classification. Comput Med Imaging Graphics 1991; 15(4):217-223.
21. Jackson EF, Narayana PA, Falconer JC. Reproducibility of nonparametric feature map segmentation for determination of normal human intracranial volumes with MR imaging data. JMRI 1994; 4:692-700.
22. Rogowska J, Wolf GL. Temporal correlation images derived from sequential MR scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16(5):784-788.
23. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method. (Breast imaging reporting and data system). Am Fam Physician 1997; 55:1548-1551.
24. Morgan PH, Mercer LP, Flodin NW. General model for nutritional responses of higher organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975; 72:4327-4331.
25. Kelcz F, Santyr GE, Cron GO, Mongin SJ. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. JMRI 1996; 6(5):743-752.
26. Young IT, Walker JE, Bowie JE. An analysis technique for biological shape I. Information Control 1974; 25:357-370.
27. Costanza MC, Afifi AA. Comparison of stopping rules in forward stepwise discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74: 777-785.
28. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernetics 1973; V SMC3(6):610-621.
29. Wei D, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 1995; 22(9):1501-1513.
30. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Williford ME, Floyd CE. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 1996; 196:817-822.
31. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.