New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 645-652

  Gal, Yaniv ^a   Mehnert, Andrew ^a   Bradley, Andrew ^a   Kennedy, Dominic ^b   Crozier, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b GREENSLOPES PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

automatic classification; breast cancer; feature extraction; feature selection; magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); FEATURE SELECTION; MAGNETISM; MEDICAL IMAGING; RESONANCE;

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; BENIGN LESION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CLASSIFIEDS; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEATURES EXTRACTION; FEATURES SELECTION; MALIGNANT LESION; SPATIOTEMPORAL FEATURE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 80052983073     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318224234f     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, DeBruhl ND, et al. Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:1016-1026. (Pubitemid 28372876)
2. Behrens S, Laue H, Althaus M, et al. Computer assistance for MR based diagnosis of breast cancer: Present and future challenges. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007;31:236-247. (Pubitemid 46601788)
3. Heiberg EV, Perman WH, Herrmann VM, et al. Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast. Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;14:337-348. (Pubitemid 26195067)
4. Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: Diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;229:225-232. (Pubitemid 37152128)
5. Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol. 1998;71: 501-509. (Pubitemid 28243071)
6. Orel S, Schnall M. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13.
7. Warren R, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: Sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology. 2005;236:779.
8. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:379-386.
9. Nattkemper TW, Arnrich B, Lichte O, et al. Evaluation of radiological features for breast tumour classification in clinical screening with machine learning methods. Artif Intell Med. 2005;34:129-139. (Pubitemid 40719030)
10. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Available at: Www.arc.org. American College of Radiology. 2006. Accessed February 28, 2008.
11. Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, et al. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys. 2006;33:2878-2887. (Pubitemid 44154559)
12. Chen W, Giger ML, Lan L, et al. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: Investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys. 2004;31:1076-1082. (Pubitemid 38656778)
13. Arbach L, Stolpen A, Reinhardt JM. Classification of breast MRI lesions using a Backpropagation Neural Network (BNN). In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano. Arlington, VA: IEEE Society; 2004;1:253-256. (Pubitemid 40513923)
14. Torheim G, Godtliebsen F, Axelson D, et al. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data. IEEE Transact Med Imaging. 2001;20:1293-1301. (Pubitemid 34125138)
15. Lee SH, Kim JH, Kim KG, et al. Optimal clustering of kinetic patterns on malignant breast lesions: Comparison between K-means clustering and three-time-points method in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Lyon, France: IOP Publishing; 2007;2089-2093.
16. Zheng Y, Englander S, Baloch S, et al. STEP: Spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis. Med Phys. 2009;36:3192.
17. Furman-Haran E, Degani H. Parametric analysis of breast MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:376-386. (Pubitemid 34564216)
18. Jain AK, Duin RPW, Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: A review. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI). Arlington, VA: IEEE Society; 2000;22:4-37. (Pubitemid 32132953)
19. Gal Y, Mehnert A, Bradley A, et al. An Evaluation of Four Parametric Models of Contrast Enhancement for Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast. Lyon, France: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2007:71-74.
20. Levin A, Zomet A, Weiss Y. Learning how to inpaint from global image statistics. In: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Nice, France: IEEE Computer Society; 2003:305-312.
21. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: An open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17:205-216. (Pubitemid 40378992)
22. Landini G, Rippin JW. How important is tumor shape? Quantification of the epithelialYconnective tissue interface in oral lesions using local connected fractal dimension analysis. J Pathol. 1996;179:210-217.
23. Gal Y, Mehnert A, Bradley A, et al. Denoising of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images using dynamic non-local means. IEEE Transact Med Imaging. 2010;29:302-310.
24. Webb A. Statistical Pattern Recognition. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003.
25. Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput. 1992;4:1-58.
26. Hanley JA, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36. (Pubitemid 12142173)
27. Morris EA, Liberman L. Breast MRI-Diagnosis and Intervention. New York, NY: Springer; 2005.
28. Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, et al. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med. 1997;3:780-782. (Pubitemid 27298724)