Hind Wing Shape Evolves Faster than Front Wing Shape in Calopteryx Damselflies

Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 116-125

  Outomuro, David ^a   Bokma, Folmer ^b   Johansson, Frank ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Evolutionary divergence; Functional differentiation; Geometric morphometrics; Phylogeny; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

CALOPTERYX; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 84857447510     PISSN: 00713260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-011-9145-4     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams, D.C., Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D.E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the revolution. The Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16.
2. Anders, U., & Rüppell, G. (1997). Relationships of some European Calopteryx species suggested by time analysis of courtship flights. Entomologica Germanica, 21, 253-264.
3. Anderson, C.N., & Grether, G.F. (2010). Interspecific aggression and character displacement of competitor recognition in Hetaerina damselflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 277, 549-555.
4. Arnqvist, G. (1998). Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature, 393, 784-786.
5. Askew, R.R. (2004). The dragonflies of Europe revised edition. Colchester: Harley Books.
6. Beldade, P., Koops, K., & Brakefield, P.M. (2002). Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature, 416, 844-847.
7. Berwaerts, K., Aerts, P., & van Dyck, H. (2006). On the sex-specific mechanisms of butterfly flight: Flight performance relative to flight morphology, wing kinematics, and sex in Pararge aegeria. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 675-687.
8. Berwaerts, K., van Dyck, H., & Aerts, P. (2002). Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Functional Ecology, 16, 484-491.
9. Betts, C.R., & Wootton, R.J. (1988). Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): A preliminary analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 138, 271-288.
10. Beukema, J.J. (2004). Recognition of conspecific females by males of Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis (Vander Linden) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 33, 147-156.
11. Bonduriansky, R., & Rowe, L. (2005). Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae). Evolution, 59, 1965-1975.
12. Bots, J., Breuker, C.J., van Kerkhove, A., van Dongen, S., De Bruyn, L., & van Gossum, H. (2009). Variation in flight morphology in a female polymorphic damselfly: Intraspecific, intrasexual, and seasonal differences. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 87, 86-94.
13. Bowlin, M.S., & Wikelski, M. (2008). Pointed wings, low wingloading and calm air reduce migratory flight costs in songbirds. PLoS ONE, 3, e2154.
14. Breuker, C.J., Brakefield, P.M., & Gibbs, M. (2007). The association between wing morphology and dispersal is sex-specific in the glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). European Journal of Entomology, 104, 445-452.
15. Bullen, R.D., & McKenzie, N.L. (2007). Bat wing airfoil and planform structures relating to aerodynamic cleanliness. The Australian Journal of Zoology, 55, 237-247.
16. Calmaestra, R.G., & Moreno, E. (2001). A phylogenetically-based analysis on the relationship between wing morphology and migratory behaviour in Passeriformes. Ardea, 89, 407-416.
17. Chaput-Bardy, A., Grégorie, A., Baguette, M., Pagano, A., & Secondi, J. (2010). Condition and phenotype-dependent dispersal in a damselfly, Calopteryx splendens. PLoS ONE, 5, e10694.
18. Conrad, K.F., & Herman, T.B. (1987). Territorial and reproductive behaviour of Calopteryx aequabilis Say (Odonata: Calopterygidae) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Advances in Odonatology, 3, 41-50.
19. Contreras-Garduño, J., Buzatto, B. A., Serrano-Meneses, M. A., Nájera-Cordero, K., & Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2008). The size of the red wing spot of the American rubyspot as a heightened condition-dependent ornament. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 724-732.
20. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2000). Reproductive behaviour of the territorial damselfly Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis asturica Ocharan (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 29, 295-305.
21. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2002). Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: a possible relation to sexual selection. Animal Behaviour, 63, 759-766.
22. Córdoba-Aguilar, A., & Cordero-Rivera, A. (2005). Evolution and ecology of Calopterygidae (Zygoptera: Odonata): Status of knowledge and research perspectives. Neotropical Entomology, 34, 861-879.
23. Córdoba-Aguilar, A., Salamanca-Ocaña, J.C., & Lopezaraiza, M. (2003). Female reproductive decisions and parasite burden in a calopterygid damselfly (Insecta: Odonata). Animal Behaviour, 66, 81-87.
24. Debat, V., Bégin, M., Legout, H., & David, J.R. (2003). Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution, 57, 2773-2784.
25. DeVries, P.J., Penz, C.M., & Hill, R.I. (2010). Vertical distribution, flight behaviour and evolution of wing morphology in Morpho butterflies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 1077-1085.
26. Dockx, C. (2007). Directional and stabilizing selection on wing size and shape in migrant and resident monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in Cuba. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92, 605-616.
27. Drummond, A.J., & Rambaut, A. (2007). BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 214.
28. Dumont, H.J., Vanfleteren, J.R., De Jonckheere, J.F., & Weekers, P. H. H. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships, divergence time estimation, and global biogeographic patterns of Calopterygoid damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera) inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Biology, 54, 347-362.
29. Endler, J.A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist, 139, S125-S153.
30. Eroukhmanoff, F., Outomuro, D., Ocharan, F.J., & Svensson, E.I. (2009). Patterns of phenotypic divergence in wing covariance structure of calopterygid damselflies. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 214-224.
31. Fernández, G., & Lank, D.B. (2007). Variation in the wing morphology of western sandpipers (Calidris mauri) in relation to sex, age class, and annual cycle. Auk, 124, 1037-1046.
32. Förschler, M.I., & Bairlein, F. (2011). Morphological shifts of the external flight apparatus across the range of a passerine (Northern wheatear) with diverging migratory behaviour. PLoS ONE, 6, e18732.
33. Gibbons, D.W., & Pain, D. (1992). The influence of river flow rate on the breeding behaviour of Calopteryx damselflies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 283-289.
34. Grabow, K., & Rüppell, G. (1995). Wing loading in relation to size and flight characteristics of European Odonata. Odonatologica, 24, 175-186.
35. Grether, G.F. (1996). Intrasexual competition alone favors a sexually dimorphic ornament in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution, 50, 1949-1957.
36. Grether, G.F., & Grey, R.M. (1996). Novel cost of a sexually selected trait in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana: conspicuousness to prey. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 465-473.
37. Hedenström, A. (2002). Aerodynamics, evolution and ecology of avian flight. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 415-422.
38. Hedenström, A., & Møller, A.P. (1992). Morphological adaptations to song flight in passerine birds: a comparative study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 247, 183-187.
39. Heymer, A. (1972). Comportements social et territorial des Calopterygidae (Odon. Zygoptera). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 8, 3-53.
40. Heymer, A. (1973). Étude du comportement reproducteur et analyse des mécanismes déclencheurs innés (MDI) optiques chez les Calopterygidae (Odon Zygoptera). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 9, 219-255.
41. Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., & Blakeley, D.S. (1999). Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographic range. Oecologia, 121, 165-170.
42. Johansson, F., Söderquist, M., & Bokma, F. (2009). Insect wing shape evolution: independent effects of migratory and mate guarding flight on dragonfly wings. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 97, 362-372.
43. Kiauta, B. (1969). Sex chromosomes and sex determining mechanisms in Odonata, with a review of the cytological conditions in the family Gomphidae, and references to the karyotypic evolution in the order. Genetica, 40, 127-157.
44. Lele, S., & Richtsmeier, J.T. (1991). Euclidean distance matrix: a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 415-427.
45. Maddison W, Maddison D. (2010). Mesquite Version 2. 74. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/mesquite.html.
46. Marchetti, K., Price, T., & Richman, A. (1995). Correlates of wing morphology with foraging behaviour and migration distance in the genus Phylloscopus. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 177-181.
47. Meek, S.B., & Herman, T.B. (1990). A comparison of the reproductive behaviours of three Calopteryx species (Odonata: Calopterygidae) in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 10-16.
48. Misof, B., Anderson, C.L., & Hadrys, H. (2000). A phylogeny of the damselfly Genus Calopteryx (Odonata) using mitochondrial 16S rDNA markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 15, 5-14.
49. Miyakawa, K. (1982). Reproductive behaviour and life span of adult Calopteryx atrata Selys and C virgo japonica Selys (Odonata: Zygoptera). Advances in Odonatology, 1, 193-203.
50. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P.M., & French, V. (1997). The relationship between eyespot shape and wing shape in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: A genetic and morphometrical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 787-802.
51. Nijhout, H.F., Wray, G.A., & Gilbert, L.E. (1990). An analysis of the phenotypic effects of certain colour pattern genes in Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 40, 357-372.
52. Norberg, U.M. (1995). How a long tail and changes in mass and wing shape affect the cost for flight in animals. Functional Ecology, 9, 48-54.
53. Norberg, U.M., & Rayner, J.M.V. (1987). Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 316, 335-427.
54. Oliver, J.C., Robertson, K.A., & Monteiro, A. (2009). Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 276, 2369-2375.
55. Outomuro, D., & Johansson, F. (2011). The effects of latitude, body size and sexual selection on wing shape in a damselfly. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102, 263-274.
56. Pajunen, V.I. (1966). Aggressive behaviour and territoriality in a population of Calopteryx virgo L. (Odon., Calopterygidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 3, 201-214.
57. Poissant, J., Wilson, A.J., & Coltman, D.W. (2009). Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution, 64, 97-107.
58. Potti, J., & Canal, D. (2011). Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament. Heredity, 106, 945-954.
59. Rantala, M.J., Koskimäki, J., Taskinen, J., Tynkkynen, K., & Suhonen, J. (2000). Immunocompetence, developmental stability and wingspot size in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens L. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 267, 2453-2457.
60. Reels, G. (2008). The phoenix damselfly (Pseudolestes mirabilis) of Hainan Island, China. Agrion, 12, 44-45.
61. Robert, P.-A. (1958). Les libellules (Odonates). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
62. Rohlf F.J. (2004). TpsSplin, Version 1. 20. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
63. Rohlf F.J. (2007). TpsTree, Version 1. 21. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
64. Rohlf F.J. (2008). TpsRelw, Version 1. 46. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
65. Rohlf F.J. (2009). TpsDig2, Version 2. 14. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
66. Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40-59.
67. Rüppell, G. (1989). Kinematic analysis of symmetrical flight manoeuvres of Odonata. Journal of Experimental Biology, 144, 13-42.
68. Rüppell, G., Hilfert-Rüppell, D., Rehfeldt, G., & Schütte, C. (2005). Die Prachtlibellen Europas. Gattung Calopteryx. Hohenwarsleben: Westarp Wissenschaften.
69. Rutowski, R.L., Nahm, A.C., & Macedonia, J.M. (2010). Iridescent hindwing patches in the Pipevine Swallowtail: differences in dorsal and ventral surfaces relate to signal function and context. Functional Ecology, 24, 767-775.
70. Santolamazza, S., Baquero, E., & Cordero-Rivera, A. (2011). Incidence of Anagrus obscurus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) egg parasitism on Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis and Platycnemis pennipes (Odonata: Calopterygidae: Platycnemididae) in Italy. Entomological Science, 14, 366-369.
71. Shingleton, A.W., Frankino, W.A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H.F., & Emlen, D.J. (2007). Size and shape: The developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. Bioessays, 29, 536-548.
72. Siva-Jothy, M.T. (1999). Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour, 136, 1365-1377.
73. Siva-Jothy, M.T. (2000). A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 267, 2523-2527.
74. Siva-Jothy, M.T., Gibbons, D.W., & Pain, D. (1995). Female oviposition-site preference and egg hatching success in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 39-44.
75. Siva-Jothy, M.T., & Plaistow, S.J. (1999). A fitness cost of eugregarine parasitism in a damselfly. Ecological Entomology, 24, 465-470.
76. Srygley, R.B. (1994). Locomotor mimicry in butterflies? The associations of positions of centres of mass among groups of mimetic, unprofitable prey. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 343, 145-155.
77. Srygley, R.B. (1999). Locomotor mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: contrast analyses of flight morphology and kinematics. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 354, 203-214.
78. Stiles, F.G., Altshuler, D.L., & Dudley, R. (2005). Wing morphology and flight behaviour of some North American hummingbird species. Auk, 122, 872-886.
79. Svensson, E.I., Eroukhmanoff, F., & Friberg, M. (2006). Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution, 60, 1242-1253.
80. Svensson, E.I., & Friberg, M. (2007). Selective predation on wing morphology in sympatric damselflies. American Naturalist, 170, 101-112.
81. Svensson, E.I., Karlsson, K., Friberg, M., & Eroukhmanoff, F. (2007). Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Current Biology, 17, 1943-1947.
82. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007). MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4. 0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596-1599.
83. Taylor, G.K. (2001). Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control. Biological Review, 76, 449-471.
84. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., & Gibson, T.J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680.
85. Tynkkynen, K., Rantala, M.J., & Suhonen, J. (2004). Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 759-767.
86. Voelker, G. (2001). Morphological correlates of migratory distance and flight display in the avian genus Anthus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 73, 425-435.
87. Vukusic, P., Wooton, R.J., & Sambles, J.R. (2004). Remarkable iridescence in the hindwings of the damselfly Neurobasis chinensis chinensis (Linnaeus) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 595-601.
88. Waage, J.K. (1973). Reproductive behavior and its relation to territoriality in Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Behaviour, 47, 240-256.
89. Waage, J.K. (1975). Reproductive isolation and the potential for character displacement in the damselflies, Calopteryx maculata and C. aequabilis (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Systematic Zoology, 24, 24-36.
90. Waage, J.K. (1988). Reproductive behaviour of the damselfly Calopteryx dimidiata Burmeister (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica, 17, 365-378.
91. Weekers, P.H.H., De Jonckheere, J.F., & Dumont, H.J. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships inferred from ribosomal ITS sequences and biogeographic patterns in representatives of the genus Calopteryx (Insecta: Odonata) of the West Mediterranean and adjacent West European zone. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 89-99.
92. Wellenreuther, M., Tynkkynen, K., & Svensson, E.I. (2010). Simulating range expansion: Male species recognition and loss of premating isolation in damselflies. Evolution, 64, 242-252.
93. Wootton, R.J. (1992). Functional morphology of insect wings. Annual Review of Entomology, 37, 113-140.