Postmating sexual selection: Allopatric evolution of sperm competition mechanisms and genital morphology in calopterygid damselflies (Insecta: Odonata)

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 349-359

  Cordero Rivera, A ^a   Andres J A ^a,d   Cordoba Aguilar A ^b   Utzeri, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis; Cryptic female choice; Damselfly; Genital evolution; Phenotypic differentiation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DAMSELFLY; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMALIA; CALOPTERYGIDAE; CALOPTERYX HAEMORRHOIDALIS; CALOPTERYX SPLENDENS; CALOPTERYX VIRGO; HETAERINA CRUENTATA; INSECTA; INVERTEBRATA; ODONATA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 1642263344     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01650.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adams, J. A., and T. H. Herman. 1991. A comparison of the male genitalia of three Calopteryx species (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Can. J. Zool. 69:1164-1170.
2. Anders, U., and G. Rüppell. 1997. Zeitanalyse der Balzflüge europäischer Prachtlibellen-Arten zur Betrachtung ihrer Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Entomol. Gen. 21:253-264.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Andrés, J. A., and G. Arnqvist. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 399-405.
5. Andrés, J. A., and A. Cordero Rivera. 2000. Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice? Anim. Behav. 59:695-703.
6. Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393:784-785.
7. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261:123-127.
8. _. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
9. Askew, R. R. 1988. The dragonflies of Europe. Harley Books, Martins, Essex, U.K.
10. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
11. Brown, D. V., and P. E. Eady. 2001. Functional incompatibility between the fertilization systems of two allopatric populations of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Evolution 55:2257-2262.
12. Butlin, R. K., and T. Tregenza. 1998. Levels of genetic polymorphism: marker loci versus quantitative traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:187-198.
13. Cordero, A. 1999. Forced copulations and female contact guarding at a high male density in a calopterygid damselfly. J. Insect Behav. 12:27-37.
14. Cordero, A., and P. L. Miller. 1992. Sperm transfer, displacement and precedence in Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30:261-267.
15. Cordero Rivera, A., and J. A. Andrés. 2002. Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly (Odonata). J. Insect Sci. 2:14.
16. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. 1999a. Copulation and the evolution of genital morphology in the damselfly Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis asturica. 1-143. Ph.D. diss., University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K.
17. _. 1999b. Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:779-784.
18. _. 2000. Reproductive behaviour of the territorial damselfly Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis asturica Ocharan (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 29:295-305.
19. _. 2003a. A description of male and female genitalia and a reconstruction of copulatory and fertilisation events in Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis (Varder Linden) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 32:205-214.
20. _. 2003b. Predicting mechanisms of sperm displacement based on genitalic morphometrics in the Calopterygidae (Odonata). J. Insect Behav. 16:153-167.
21. _. 2002. Sensory trap and the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). Am. Nat. 160:594-601.
22. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
23. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
24. Dumont, H. J. 1972. The taxonomic status of Calopteryx xanthostoma (Charpentier, 1825) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 1:21-29.
25. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Garrison, R. W. 1990. A synopsis of the genus Hetaerina with descriptions of four new species (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 116:175-260.
27. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886-889.
28. Hadrys, H., B. Schierwater, S. L. Dellaporta, R. DeSalle, and L. W. Buss. 1993. Determination of paternity in dragonflies by random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprints. Mol. Ecol. 2: 79-87.
29. Haubruge, E., L. Arnaud, J. Mignon, and M. J. G. Gage. 1999. Fertilization by proxy: rival sperm removal and translocation in a beetle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:1183-1187.
30. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7.
31. Hribar, L. 1994. Geographic variation of male genitalia of Anopheles nuneztovari (Diptera:Culicidae). Mosquito Sys. 26:132-144.
32. Jennions, M. D., and C. D. Kelly. 2002. Geographical variation in male genitalia in Brachyrhaphis episcopi (Poeciliidae): is it sexually or naturally selected? Oikos 97:79-86.
33. Kamimura, Y. 2000. Possible removal of rival sperm by the elongated genitalia of the earwig, Euborellia plebeja. Zool. Sci. 17: 667-672.
34. Lindeboom, M. 1998. Post-copulatory behaviour in Calopteryx females (Insecta, Odonata, Calopterygidae). Int. J. Odonatol 1: 175-184.
35. Maibach, A. 1985. Révision systématique du genre Calopteryx Leach (Odonata, Zygoptera) pour l'Europe occidentale. I. Analyses biochimiques. Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 58:477-492.
36. Miller, G. T., and S. Pitnick. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298:1230-1233.
37. Miller, P. L., and C. A. Miller. 1981. Field observations on copulatory behaviour in Zygoptera, with an examination of the structure and activity of male genitalia. Odonatologica 10:201-218.
38. Misof, B., C. L. Anderson, and H. Hadrys. 2000. A phylogeny of the damselfly genus Calopteryx (Odonata) using mitochondrial 16S rDNA markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15:5-14.
39. Nilsson, T., C. Fricke, and G. Arnqvist. 2002. Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56:111-120.
40. _, 2003. The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53:227-233.
41. Ocharán, F. J. 1983. Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis asturica, nueva subespecie de caballito del diablo del norte de España (Odonata: Zygoptera). Bol. Cien. Nat. I. D. E. A. 31:3-10.
42. Ono, T., M. T. Siva-Jothy, and A. Kato. 1989. Removal and subsequent ingestion of rivals' semen during copulation in a tree cricket. Physiol. Entomol. 14:195-202.
43. Opphenheimer, S. D., and J. K. Waage. 1987. Hand-pairing: a new technique for obtaining copulations within and between Calopteryx species (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 16: 291-296.
44. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
45. Parker, G. A., and L. Partridge. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:261-274.
46. Pither, J., and P. D. Taylor. 2000. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry in the black-winged damselfly Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Can. J. Zool. 78:1740-1748.
47. Pitnick, S., T. A. Markow, and G. S. Spicer. 2002. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53:1894-1822.
48. Presgraves, D. C., R. H. Baker, and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:1041-1047.
49. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
50. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
51. Siva-Jothy, M. T., and R. E. Hooper. 1995. The disposition and genetic diversity of stored sperm in females of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259:313-318.
52. _. 1996. Differential use of stored sperm during oviposition in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39:389-393.
53. Siva-Jothy, M. T., and Y. Tsubaki. 1989. Variation in copulation duration in Mnais pruinosa pruinosa Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). 1. Alternative mate-securing tactics and sperm precedence. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24:39-45.
54. Siva-Jothy, M. T., and Y. Tsubaki. 1994. Sperm competition and sperm precedence in the dragonfly Nanophya pygmaea. Physiol. Entomol. 19:363-366.
55. Smith, R. L. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
56. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
57. Spitze, K. 1993. Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozyme variation. Genetics 135:367-374.
58. Tatsuta, H., and S. Akimoto. 1998. Sexual differences in the pattern of spatial variation in the brachypterous grasshopper Podisma sapporensis (Orthoptera: Podisminae). Can. J. Zool. 76: 1450-1456.
59. Tregenza, T. 2002. Divergence and reproductive isolation in early stages of speciation. Genetics 116:291-300.
60. von Helversen, D., and O. von Helversen. 1991. Pre-mating sperm removal in the bushcricket Metaplastes ornatus Ramme 1931 (Othoptera, Tettigonoidea, Phaneropteridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28:391-396.
61. Waage, J. K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916-918.
62. _. 1980. Adult sex ratios and female reproductive potential in Calopteryx (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 9: 217-230.
63. _. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of odonate mating systems. Pp. 251-290 in R. L. Smith, ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
64. _. 1986. Evidence for widespread sperm displacement ability among Zygoptera (Odonata) and the means for predicting its presence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 28:285-300.
65. Ward, P. I. 1998. A possible explanation for cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Ethology 104:97-110.
66. _. 2001. Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Evolution 54:1680-1686.
67. Weekers, P. H. H., J. F. de Jonckheere, and H. J. Dumont. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships inferred from ribosomal ITS sequences and biogeographic patterns in representatives of the genus Calopteryx (Insecta: Odonata) of the west Mediterranean and adjacent West European zone. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20:89-99.
68. Wilson, N., S. C. Tubman, P. E. Eady, and G. W. Robertson. 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1491-1495.
69. Yokoi, N. 1990. The sperm removal behavior of the yellow spotted longicorn beetle Psacothea hilaris (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 25:383-388.