Reflections on collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 443-448

  Lin, Tzu Jung ^a   Anderson, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349098130     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.002     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Alter A.L., Oppenheimer D.M., Epley N., and Eyre R.N. Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (2007) 569-576
2. Anderson R.C., Chinn C.A., Chang J., Waggoner M., and Yi H.-J. On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction 15 (1997) 135-167
3. Anderson R.C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., McNurlen B., Archodidou A., Kim S.-Y., Reznitskaya A., et al. The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction 19 (2001) 1-46
4. Chinn C.A., and Anderson R.C. The structure of discussions that promote reasoning. Teachers College Record 100 (1998) 315-368
5. Chinn C.A., and Brewer W.F. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research 63 (1993) 1-49
6. Chiu M.M. Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students' collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (2008) 382-402
7. Chiu M.M., and Khoo L. A new method of analyzing sequential processes: Dynamic Multilevel Analysis. Small Group Research 36 (2005) 600-631
8. Clark A.M., Anderson R.C., Kuo L.-J., Kim I.-H., Archodidou A., and Nguyen-Jahiel K. Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review 15 (2003) 181-198
9. Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I. -H., & Li, Y. (in press). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly.
10. Finlayson A. Political science, political ideas and rhetoric. Economy and Society 33 (2004) 528-549
11. Hagler D., and Brem S.K. Reaching agreement: The structure and pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (2008) 403-424
12. Johnson-Laird P.N., Schaeken W., and Byrne R.M.J. Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 418-439
13. Keefer M.W., Zeitz C.M., and Resnick L.B. Judging the quality of peer-led dialogues. Cognition and Instruction 18 (2000) 53-81
14. Kim I.-H., Anderson R.C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., and Archodidou A. Discourse patterns during children's collaborative online discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 (2007) 333-370
15. Limon M.S., and Kazoleas D.C. A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter-arguments and responses to a message. Communication Research Reports 21 (2005) 291-298
16. Lu J., and Lajoie S.P. Supporting medical decision making with argumentation tools. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (2008) 425-442
17. Kuhn D., Flaton R., and Weinstock M. How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 289-296
18. Narvaez D. Using discourse processing methods to study moral thinking. Educational Psychology Review 11 (2001) 377-393
19. Nickerson R.S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2 (1998) 175-220
20. Pennington N., and Hastie R. Explaining the evidence-tests of the story model for juror decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (1992) 189-206
21. Voss J.F., Blais J., Means M.L., Greene T.R., and Ahwesh E. Information reasoning and subject matter knowledge in the solving of economics problems by naïve and novice individuals. Cognition and Instruction 3 (1986) 269-302
22. Webb N.M., Franke M.L., Ing M., Chan A., De T., Freund D., et al. The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (2008) 360-381