Moving from peanut extract to peanut components: Towards validation of component-resolved IgE tests

Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 748-756

  Aalberse, J A ^a,b   Meijer, Y ^b   Derksen, N ^a   Van Der Palen Merkus, T ^a   Knol, E ^c   Aalberse, R C ^a  

^a CENTRAL LABORATORY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

IgE serology; immunoblot; peanut extracts; radioallergosorbent test; recombinant allergens

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; N (2 AMINOETHYL) 5 ISOQUINOLINESULFONAMIDE; PEANUT EXTRACT; RECOMBINANT ALLERGEN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PEANUT ALLERGY; PH; PRICK TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RADIOALLERGOSORBENT TEST; SERODIAGNOSIS;

ALLERGENS; ANTIGENS, PLANT; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHILD; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; HUMANS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; PLANT EXTRACTS; VEGETABLE PROTEINS;

EID: 84878089390     PISSN: 01054538     EISSN: 13989995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/all.12160     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dang TD, Tang M, Choo S, Licciardi PV, Koplin JJ, Martin PE, et al. Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1056-1063.
2. Maloney JM, Rudengren M, Ahlstedt S, Bock SA, Sampson HA,. The use of serum-specific IgE measurements for the diagnosis of peanut, tree nut, and seed allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122: 145-151.
3. Kleber-Janke T, Crameri R, Appenzeller U, Schlaak M, Becker WM,. Selective cloning of peanut allergens, including profilin and 2S albumins, by phage display technology. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1999; 119: 265-274.
4. Flinterman AE, van Hoffen E, den Hartog Jager CF, Koppelman S, Pasmans SG, Hoekstra MO, et al. Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time. Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37: 1221-1228.
5. Asarnoj A, Moverare R, Ostblom E, Poorafshar M, Lilja G, Hedlin G, et al. IgE to peanut allergen components: relation to peanut symptoms and pollen sensitization in 8-year-olds. Allergy 2010; 65: 1189-1195.
6. Nicolaou N, Murray C, Belgrave D, Poorafshar M, Simpson A, Custovic A,. Quantification of specific IgE to whole peanut extract and peanut components in prediction of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127: 684-685.
7. Astier C, Morisset M, Roitel O, Codreanu F, Jacquenet S, Franck P,. Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 250-256.
8. Peeters KA, Koppelman SJ, van Hoffen E, Van der Tas CW, Den Hartog Jager CF, Penninks AH,. Does skin prick test reactivity to purified allergens correlate with clinical severity of peanut allergy? Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37: 108-115.
9. Vereda A, van Hage M, Ahlstedt S, Ibanez MD, Cuesta-Herranz J, van Odijk J, et al. Peanut allergy: clinical and immunologic differences among patients from 3 different geographic regions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127: 603-607.
10. Flinterman AE, Pasmans SG, Hoekstra MO, Meijer Y, van Hoffen E, Knol EF, et al. Determination of no-observed-adverse-effect levels and eliciting doses in a representative group of peanut-sensitized children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 448-454.
11. Sampson H,. Anaphylaxis and Emergency Treatment. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1601-1608.
12. Mittag D, Akkerdaas J, Ballmer-Weber BK, Vogel L, Wensing M, Becker WM, et al. Ara h 8, a Bet v 1-homologous allergen from peanut, is a major allergen in patients with combined birch pollen and peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114: 1410-1417.
13. Van der Veen MJ, Van Ree R, Aalberse RC, Akkerdaas J, Koppelman SJ, Jansen HM, et al. Poor biologic activity of cross-reactive IgE directed to carbohydrate determinants of glycoproteins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100: 327-334.
14. Javaloyes G, Goikoetxea MJ, García Nuñez I, Aranda A, Sanz ML, Blanca M, et al. Pru p 3 acts as a strong sensitizer for peanut allergy in Spain. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130: 1432-1434.
15. Schuurman J, Perdok GJ, Lourens TE, Parren PW, Chapman MD, Aalberse RC,. Production of a mouse/human chimeric IgE monoclonal antibody to the house dust mite allergen Der p 2 and its use for the absolute quantification of allergen-specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 99: 545-550.
16. Koppelman SJ, Knol EF, Vlooswijk RA, Wensing M, Knulst AC, Hefle SL, et al. Peanut allergen Ara h 3: isolation from peanuts and biochemical characterization. Allergy 2003; 58: 1144-1151.
17. Wichers HJ, De Beijer T, Savelkoul HF, Van Amerongen A,. The major peanut allergen Ara h 1 and its cleaved-off N-terminal peptide; possible implications for peanut allergen detection. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 28: 52.
18. Piersma SR, Gaspari M, Hefle SL, Koppelman SJ,. Proteolytic processing of the peanut allergen Ara h 3. Mol Nutr Food Res 2005; 49: 744-755.
19. Pons L, Chery C, Romano A, Namour F, Artesani MC, Gueant JL,. The 18 kDa peanut oleosin is a candidate allergen for IgE-mediated reactions to peanuts. Allergy 2002; 57 (Suppl 72): 88-93.
20. Lee K, Ratnayake C, Huang AH,. Genetic dissection of the co-expression of genes encoding the two isoforms of oleosins in the oil bodies of maize kernel. Plant J 1995; 7: 603-611.
21. Asarnoj A, Nilsson C, Lidholm J, Glaumann S, Ostblom E, Hedlin G, et al. Peanut component Ara h 8 sensitization and tolerance to peanut. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130: 468-472.
22. Mittag D, Vieths S, Vogel L, Becker WM, Rihs HP, Helbling A, et al. Soybean allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen: clinical investigation and molecular characterization of allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113: 148-154.
23. Cabanos C, Tandang-Silvas MR, Odijk V, Brostedt P, Tanaka A, Utsumi S, et al. Expression, purification, cross-reactivity and homology modeling of peanut profilin. Protein Expr Purif 2010; 73: 36-45.