Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis-testing behavior in young children

Child Development

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 173-185

  Legare, Cristine H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COLOR VISION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

AGE FACTORS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; JUDGMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84856269735     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amsterlaw, J., & Wellman, H. (2006). Theories of mind in transition: A microgenetic study of the development of false belief understanding. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 139-172.
2. Baldwin, D., Markman, E., & Melartin, R. (1993). Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: Evidence from exploratory play. Child Development, 64, 711-728.
3. Bindra, D., Clarke, K., & Shultz, T. (1980). Understanding predictive relations of necessity and sufficiency in formally equivalent "causal" and "logical" problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 422-443.
4. Bonawitz, E., Lim, S., & Schulz, L. E. (2008). Weighing the evidence: Children's naïve theories of balance affect their exploratory play. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the 29th Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bonawitz, E. B., & Lombrozo, T. (in press). Occam's rattle: Children's use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology.
6. Callanan, M., & Oakes, L. (1992). Preschoolers' questions and parents' explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7, 213-233.
7. Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Children's acquisition of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098-1120.
8. Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
9. Chi, M., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
10. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
11. Cook, C., Goodman, N., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers' exploratory play. Cognition, 120, 341-349.
12. Crowley, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning. Child Development, 70, 304-316.
13. De Leeuw, N., & Chi, M. (2003). The role of self-explanation in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 55-78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (1988). Developmental differences in scientific discovery strategies. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon. Proceedings of the 21st Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp. 109-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Fay, A., & Klahr, D. (1996). Knowing about guessing and guessing about knowing: Preschoolers' understanding of indeterminancy. Child Development, 67, 689-716.
16. Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. W. (2007). Preschool children's preferences for explanatory detail. Poster presented at the biannual meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, Boston, MA.
17. Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers' search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592-1611.
18. Gopnik, A. (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In F. Keil & R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 299-323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71, 1205-1222.
20. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D., Schulz, L., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 620-629.
21. Hickling, A., & Wellman, H. (2001). The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 668-683.
22. Hutt, C., & Bhavnani, R. (1972). Predictions from play. Nature, 237, 171-172.
23. Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1978). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195-212.
24. Keil, F. (2006). Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227-254.
25. Keil, F., & Wilson, R. (2000). Explanation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
28. Kuhn, D. (2009). Are self-explanations always beneficial? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 386-394.
29. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
30. Legare, C. H., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. W. (2010). Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children's causal explanatory reasoning. Child Development, 81, 929-944.
31. Legare, C. H., Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 177-194.
32. Lombrozo, T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 464-470.
33. Lombrozo, T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 232-257.
34. Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1045-1050.
35. Schulz, L. E., Hooppell, C., & Jenkins, A. (2008). Judicious imitation: Children differentially imitate deterministically and probabilistically effective actions. Child Development, 79, 395-410.
36. Schulz, L. E., Standing, H. R., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2008). Word, thought, and deed: The role of object categories in children's inductive inferences and exploratory play. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1266-1276.
37. Siegler, R. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225-273.
38. Switzky, H. N., Haywood, H. C., & Isett, R. (1974). Exploration, curiosity, and play in young children: Effects of stimulus complexity. Developmental Psychology, 10, 321-329.
39. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
40. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183.
41. Wellman, H. M. (2011). Reinvigorating explanations for the study of early cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 33-38.
42. Wellman, H., Hickling, A., & Schult, C. (1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Reasoning about physical, psychological and biological phenomena (pp. 7-25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2007). Causal reasoning as informed by the early development of explanations. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 261-279). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.