Convergence and interdisciplinarity in innovation management: A review, critique, and future directions

Service Industries Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 7-8, 2013, Pages 774-788

  Hacklin, Fredrik ^a   Wallin, Martin W ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

convergence; innovation management; interdisciplinarity; knowledge integration; knowledge management; review

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84877799984     PISSN: 02642069     EISSN: 17439507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2013.740471     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Adams, R., Bessant, J. and Phelps, R. 2006. Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (1): 21 - 47. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x)
2. Adamsson, N. (2007). Interdisciplinary integration in complex product development: Managerial implications of embedding software in manufactured goods, PhD thesis, KTH Stockholm, Trita-MMK, 2007:04.
3. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1): 107 - 136. (doi:10.2307/3250961)
4. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. 2002. Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12): 1029 - 1037. (doi:10.1002/asi.10107)
5. Allen, T. J. 1977. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Amabile, T. 1996. Creativity in context, 2, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C., & Tompson, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 125-148.
8. Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary - External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (4): 634 - 665. (doi:10.2307/2393475)
9. Argote, L., McEvily, B. and Reagans, R. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49 (4): 571 - 582. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424)
10. Bantel, K. A. and Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking - Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (S1): 107 - 124. (doi:10.1002/smj.4250100709)
11. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99 - 120. (doi:10.1177/014920639101700108)
12. Becker, G. S. and Murphy, K. M. 1992. The division of labor, coordination costs and knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (4): 1137 - 1160. (doi:10.2307/2118383)
13. de Boer, M., van den Bosch, F. A.J. and Volberda, H. W. 1999. Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (3): 379 - 398. (doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00141)
14. Bordons, M., Morillo, F. and Gómez, I. 2004. " Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools ". In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, Edited by: Glänzel, W., Moed, H. F. and Schmoch, U. 437 - 456. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Borés, C., Saurina, C. and Torres, R. 2003. Technological convergence: A strategic perspective. Technovation, 23 (1): 1 - 13. (doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00094-3)
16. Brusoni, S. and Genua, A. 2003. An international comparison of sectoral knowledge bases: Persistence and integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research policy, 32 (10): 1897 - 1912. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.006)
17. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. and Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4): 597 - 621. (doi:10.2307/3094825)
18. Cáceres, R., Guzmán, J. and Rekowski, M. 2011. Firms as source of variety in innovation: Influence of size and sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7 (3): 357 - 372. (doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0198-8)
19. Carlile, P.R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
20. Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15 (5): 555 - 568. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094)
21. Cavalcante, S., Kesting, P. and Ulhoi, J. 2011. Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49 (8): 1327 - 1342. (doi:10.1108/00251741111163142)
22. Corredoira, R. A. and Rosenkopf, L. 2010. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (2): 159 - 181.
23. Dahlander, L. and Frederiksen, L. 2012. The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23 (4): 988 - 1007. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0673)
24. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D. M. 2010. How open is innovation?. Research Policy, 39 (6): 699 - 709. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013)
25. Dahlander, L. and O'Mahony, S. 2011. Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science, 22 (4): 961 - 979. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0571)
26. D'Aveni, D. A., Dagnino, G. B. and Smith, K. G. 2010. The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (13): 1371 - 1385. (doi:10.1002/smj.897)
27. Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3 (2): 179 - 202. (doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179)
28. Duysters, G. and Hagedoorn, J. 1998. Technological convergence in the IT industry: The role of strategic technology alliances and technological competencies. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5 (3): 355 - 368. (doi:10.1080/13571519884431)
29. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bourgeois, L.J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737-770.
30. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Schoonhoven, C.B. (1990). Organizational growth - Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among United-States semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504-529.
31. Ensley, M. D. and Hmieleski, K. A. 2005. A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34 (7): 1091 - 1105. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008)
32. Felin, T. and Hesterly, W. S. 2007. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1): 195 - 218. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.23464020)
33. Fiol, M. 1995. Thought worlds colliding: The role of contradiction in corporate innovation processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19 (3): 71 - 91.
34. Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (8-9): 909 - 928. (doi:10.1002/smj.384)
35. Foss, N. 2009. Alternative research strategies in the knowledge movement: From macro bias to micro-foundations and multi-level explanation. European Management Review, 6 (1): 16 - 28. (doi:10.1057/emr.2009.2)
36. Gambardella, A. and Torrisi, S. 1998. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27 (5): 445 - 463. (doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00062-6)
37. Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (2): 110 - 132. (doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1)
38. Garriga, H., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013, forthcoming). How constraints and knowledge mediate open innovation-a test and extension of Laursen and Salter (2006). Strategic Management Journal.
39. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. A. 1994. Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (S2): 91 - 112. (doi:10.1002/smj.4250151007)
40. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41. Gilbert, L. E. 1998. Disciplinary breadth and interdisciplinary knowledge production. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 11 (1-2): 4 - 15. (doi:10.1007/s12130-998-1007-8)
42. Goktan, A. B. and Miles, G. 2011. Innovation speed and radicalness: Are they inversely related?. Management Decision, 49 (4): 533 - 547. (doi:10.1108/00251741111126477)
43. Gottschalg, O. and Zollo, M. 2007. Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2): 418 - 437. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351356)
44. Grandori, A. 2001. Methodological options for an integrated perspective on organization. Human Relations, 54 (1): 37 - 47. (doi:10.1177/0018726701541006)
45. Grant, R. M. 1996a. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7 (4): 375 - 387. (doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375)
46. Grant, R. M. 1996b. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 109 - 122.
47. Gruenfeld, D. H., Thomas-Hunt, M. C. and Kim, P. H. 1998. Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34 (2): 202 - 226. (doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1349)
48. Hacklin, F., Marxt, C. and Fahrni, F. 2009. Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: An extrapolation from the ICT industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (6): 723 - 736. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.003)
49. Hacklin, F., Marxt, C. and Fahrni, F. 2010. An evolutionary perspective on convergence: Inducing a stage model of inter-industry innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 49 (1-3): 220 - 249. (doi:10.1504/IJTM.2010.029419)
50. Hambrick, D.C., Cho, T.S., & Chen, M.J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
51. Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (4): 716 - 749. (doi:10.2307/2393655)
52. Harianto, F. and Pennings, J. M. 1994. Technological convergence and scope of organizational innovation. Research Policy, 23 (3): 293 - 304. (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90040-X)
53. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519 - 530.
54. Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and economic order, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Hill, S. (2008). Exploration in large, established firms: Idea generation and corporate venturing (unpublished PhD thesis). London Business School.
56. von Hippel, E. 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving - Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40 (4): 429 - 439. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429)
57. Hotho, S. and Champion, K. 2011. Small businesses in the new creative industries: Innovation as a people management challenge. Management Decision, 49 (1): 29 - 54. (doi:10.1108/00251741111094428)
58. Hovelynck, J., Dewulf, A., Francois, G. and Taillieu, T. 2010. Interdisciplinary knowledge integration through group model building: Recognizing dualities and triadizing the conversation. Environmental Science & Policy, 13 (7): 582 - 591. (doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.002)
59. Jackson, S. E. 1996. " The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams ". In Handbook of work group psychology, Edited by: West, M. A. 53 - 75. Chichester: Wiley.
60. Janssen, W., & Goldsworthy, P. (1995). Integrating and Managing Multidisciplinary Teams in Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Research. International Service for National Agricultural Research, ISNAR Briefing Paper 23.
61. Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6): 1183 - 1194. (doi:10.2307/3069433)
62. Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice, 1, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
63. Kodama, F. 1992. Technology fusion and the new R&D. Harvard Business Review, 70 (4): 70 - 78.
64. Kodama, F. 1995. Emerging patterns of innovation: Sources of Japan's technological edge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
65. Kodama, M. (2009). Boundaries Innovation and Knowledge Integration in the Japanese Firm. Long Range Planning, 42(4), 463-494.
66. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3): 383 - 397. (doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383)
67. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.
68. von Krogh, G., Ichijō, K. and Nonaka, I. 2000. Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
69. von Krogh, G. and Wallin, M. W. 2011. " The firm, human capital, and knowledge creation ". In The Oxford handbook of human capital, Edited by: Burton-Jones, A. and Spender, J.-C. (pp. 261-286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2): 131 - 150. (doi:10.1002/smj.507)
71. Lee, G. K. 2007. The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: The convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989-2001. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (1): 17 - 37. (doi:10.1002/smj.566)
72. Lee, S. M., Hwang, T. and Choi, D. 2012. Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50 (1): 147 - 162. (doi:10.1108/00251741211194921)
73. Lee, S. M., Olson, D. O. and Trimi, S. 2012. Co-innovation: Convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50 (5): 817 - 831. (doi:10.1108/00251741211227528)
74. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Well springs of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
75. March, J. 1972. Model bias in social action. Review of Educational Research, 42 (4): 413 - 429. (doi:10.3102/00346543042004413)
76. Milliken, F. J. and Martins, L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21 (2): 402 - 433.
77. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77 - 91.
78. National Academies. 2005. Facilitating interdisciplinary research, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
79. Neef, D. 1999. Making the case for knowledge management: The bigger picture. Management Decision, 37 (1): 72 - 78. (doi:10.1108/00251749910252049)
80. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. 1982. The Schumpeterian trade-off revisited. American Economic Review, 72 (1): 114 - 132.
81. Nemeth, C. and Rogers, J. 1996. Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35 (1): 67 - 76. (doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01083.x)
82. Nesta, L. and Saviotti, P. P. 2006. Firm knowledge and market value in biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (4): 625 - 652. (doi:10.1093/icc/dtl007)
83. Nissani, M. 1997. Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. The Social Science Journal, 34 (2): 201 - 216. (doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3)
84. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 (1): 14 - 37. (doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14)
85. Nonaka, I. and von Krogh, G. 2009. Perspective - Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20 (3): 635 - 652. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0412)
86. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G. and Voelpel, S. 2006. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27 (8): 1179 - 1208. (doi:10.1177/0170840606066312)
87. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Okhuysen, G. A. and Eisenhardt, K. M. 2002. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13 (4): 370 - 386. (doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.370.2947)
89. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1994. The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies. Research Policy, 23 (5): 533 - 545. (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01004-8)
90. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. and Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1): 1 - 28. (doi:10.2307/2667029)
91. Pelz, D. C. 1956. Some social-factors related to performance in a research organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1 (3): 310 - 325. (doi:10.2307/2390926)
92. Pennings, J.M., & Puranam, P. (2001). Market convergence and firm strategy: New directions for theory and research, ECIS Conference, The Future of Innovation Studies: Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
93. Perretti, F. and Negro, G. 2007. Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (5): 563 - 586. (doi:10.1002/job.464)
94. Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S. and Perreault, M. 2006. Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15 (3): 187 - 195. (doi:10.3152/147154406781775841)
96. Postrel, S. 2002. Islands of shared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science, 13 (3): 303 - 320. (doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.303.2773)
97. Prahalad, C. K. and Krishnan, M. S. 2008. The new age of innovation: Driving cocreated value through global networks, New York: McGraw-Hill.
98. Rafols, I. and Meyer, M. 2010. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82 (2): 263 - 287. (doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y)
99. Reed, R., Storrud-Barnes, S. and Jessup, L. 2012. How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention. Management Decision, 50 (1): 58 - 73. (doi:10.1108/00251741211194877)
100. Rhoten, D. and Pfirman, S. 2007. Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36 (1): 56 - 75. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001)
101. van Rijnsoever, F. J. and Hessels, L. K. 2011. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40 (3): 463 - 472. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001)
102. Roco, M. C. 2003. Nanotechnology: Convergence with modern biology and medicine. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 14 (3): 337 - 346. (doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00068-5)
103. Rodan, S. and Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (6): 541 - 562. (doi:10.1002/smj.398)
104. Rosenberg, N. 1976. Perspectives on technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (4): 287 - 306. (doi:10.1002/smj.160)
106. Sanders, W. G. and Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (2): 158 - 178. (doi:10.2307/257100)
107. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108. Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11 (4): 448 - 469. (doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602)
109. Shmulewitz, A., Langer, R. and Patton, J. 2006. Convergence in biomedical technology. Nature Biotechnology, 24 (3): 277 - 280.
110. Siegel, D. S. and Renko, M. 2012. The role of market and technological knowledge in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities. Management Decision, 50 (5): 797 - 816. (doi:10.1108/00251741211227500)
111. Söderlund, J., & Tell, F. (2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950-2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 101-112.
112. Spender, J. C. 1996. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 45 - 62.
113. Spender, J. C. and Grant, R. M. 1996. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 5 - 9.
114. Srinivasan, R., Haunschild, P. and Grewal, R. 2007. Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Science, 53 (1): 16 - 28. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0608)
115. Taylor, A. and Greve, H. R. 2006. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4): 723 - 740. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083029)
116. Tell, F. 2011. " Knowledge integration and innovation: A survey of the field ". In Knowledge integration and innovation: Critical challenges facing international technology-based firms, Edited by: Berggren, C., Bergek, A., Bengtsson, L., Hobday, M. and Söderlund, J. 20 - 60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
117. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
118. Tushman, M. L. and Katz, R. 1980. External communication and project performance - An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26 (11): 1071 - 1085. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1071)
119. Tyre, M. J. and Orlikowski, W. J. 1994. Windows of opportunity - Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5 (1): 98 - 118. (doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.98)
120. Vissers, G. and Dankbaar, B. 2002. Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11 (1): 31 - 42. (doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00234)
121. Wallin, M. W. 2012. The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature. Innovation: Management, policy & practice, 14 (2): 162 - 177. (doi:10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.162)
122. Wallin, M. W. and von Krogh, G. 2010. Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39 (2): 145 - 154. (doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.010)
123. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. and Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316 (5827): 1036 - 1039. (doi:10.1126/science.1136099)
124. Zahra, S. A. 2008. The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2 (3): 243 - 257. (doi:10.1002/sej.47)
125. Zaleznick, A. 1985. Organizational reality and psychological necessity in creativity and innovation, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
126. Zhang, Y. and Li, H. Y. 2010. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (1): 88 - 109. (doi:10.1002/smj.806)