Boundaries Innovation and Knowledge Integration in the Japanese Firm

Long Range Planning

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 463-494

  Kodama, Mitsuru ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL MARKET; JAPANESE FIRMS; JAPANESE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; LEADERSHIP STYLE; MOBILE PHONE SERVICES; NEW BUSINESS MODELS;

CONSUMER ELECTRONICS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

INTEGRATION;

BUSINESS; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN;

EID: 69949095690     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Ouchi G. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge (1981), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
2. Nonaka I., and Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company (1995), Oxford University Press, New York
3. Lampel J., and Bhalla A. Let's get natural: the discourse of community and the problem of transferring practices in knowledge management. Management Decision 45 (2007) 1069-1082
4. For example, the global market share of digital cameras (2006 figures) ranked Canon top with 18.7 percent and Sony second with 15.8 percent. Four of the top six manufacturers were Japanese (results of survey by US company IDC: see http://www.idc.com/home.jhtml;jsessionid = PP3GQD4RFWYYACQJAFICFGAKBEAUMIWD). Moreover, in Q4 2007, Sony was ranked first (19.5%) and Sharp fourth (10.1%) for global market share of LCD TVs, and Matsushita (Panasonic) was ranked first (39.6%) for plasma TVs. (Survey results from US DisplaySearch company: See http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-1FE0F932/displays earch/hs.xsl/6138.asp.) Meanwhile Matsushita and Sony are rank high in the global market share for DVD recorders. Thus the technological prowess and sales power of Japanese companies put them at the apex of the digital consumer electronics field.
5. Meanwhile, NTT DoCoMo, which was created in 1992 and went on to develop the i-mode Internet services by pioneering mobile phones, has been featured in major business magazines. Examples include Business Week (2000), Amazing DoCoMo; The company's wireless Net phone service is all the rage in Japan - and just might conquer the world, US edition; Case studies have also been taken up in leading academic journals, such as. Ratliff J. NTT DoCoMo and its i-mode success: origins and implications. California Management Review 44 3 (2002) 55-71
6. Kodama M. Transforming an old economy company through strategic communities. Long Range Planning 35 4 (2002) 349-365
7. Porter M. Competitive Strategy (1980), The Free Press, New York
8. The boundary conceptions of efficiency, power, competence, and identification become important elements for all firms making boundary decisions. See. Santos M., and Eisenhardt K. Organisational boundaries and theories of organisation. Organisation Science 16 5 (2005) 491-508
9. See, for example. Pisano G. The governance of innovation: vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 20 3 (1991) 237-249
10. See, for example. Pisano G. Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech (2006), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
11. See, for example. Williamson E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975), Free Press, New York
12. Coase H. The nature of the firm: influence. In: Williamson O.E., and Winter S.G. (Eds). The Nature of the Firm (1993), Oxford University Press, New York 61-74
13. Nickerson A., and Silverman B.S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 3 (2003) 433-465
14. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation (2003), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
15. Chesbrough H. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape (2006), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
16. Huston L., and Sakkab N. Connect and develop inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review 84 3 (2006) 58-66
17. See for example. Benson J. Organisation: a dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (1977) 221-242
18. Peng K., and Nisbett E. Culture dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 741-754
19. Das K., and Teng B. Instabilities of strategic alliances: an internal tensions perspective. Organisation Science 11 1 (2000) 77-101
20. Kodama M. Strategic community-based theory of firms: case study of dialectical management at NTT DoCoMo. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21 6 (2004) 603-634
21. See for example, Chapter 4 for details of Sony's PlayStation case. Kodama M. Project-Based Organisation in the Knowledge-Based Society (2007), Imperial College Press, UK
22. See, for example. Watts J. Six Degrees-The Science of a Connected Age (2003), W.W. Norton & Company, New York
23. Barabasi A. The New Science of Networks (2002), Perseus Books Group, New York
24. Kodama M. Knowledge creation through networked strategic communities: case studies on new product development in Japanese companies. Long Range Planning 38 1 (2005) 27-49
25. See, for example. Tushman M. Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: a contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (1979) 82-98
26. Owen-Smith J., and Powell W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organisation Science 15 (2004) 5-21
27. Network formations are generally classified as centralized and decentralized. A centralized network is suited to vertically and efficiently implementing routine information and knowledge flow and interactions (such as information and knowledge sent from central nodes to peripheral nodes). Decentralized networks (such as smaller hubs), meanwhile, suit network formations under conditions of uncertainty and new themes.
28. With decentralized network formation, the existence of tight clustering and work group autonomy is important. This structural design enhances information, knowledge exchange, and interaction at the work group level, and can effectively facilitate mutual coordination and adjustments among peripheral local nodes. Furthermore, such local cluster coordination and collaboration reduces the information processing load assigned to the central node, as peripheral nodes do not need to communicate directly with the central authority whenever a decision-making situation arises. See. Ahuja M., and Carley K. Network structure in virtual organisations. Organisation Science 10 (1999) 741-757
29. Albert R., and Barabasi A. Topology of evolving networks: local events and universality. Physical Review Letter 85 (2000) 5234-5237
30. Watts (op cit. at Ref. 12).
31. See. Watts D.J., and Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of 'Small World' networks. (6/4/98). Nature 393 (1998) 440-442
32. Watts D.J. Networks, dynamics and the small world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 105 2 (1999) 493-527 In the field of network theory, small-world networks are said to be accessible only through a small number of nodes connecting certain nodes to other nodes, and have the nature whereby nodes connected to certain nodes link together. In specialized terms, it is defined thus: The average length of a network route is short, but the cluster coefficient is high. A typical small-world network is a case comprising links among nodes isolated at a distance within a network of systematically linked neighboring nodes (point of connection: individuals within society) and randomly linked through shortcuts
33. Research conducted previously indicates that in a large number of industries, networks arising from strategic alliances resemble this small-world network. See. Padula G. Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balancing cohesiveness and bridging ties. Long Range Planning 41 4 (2008) 395-415
34. See, for example. Newman J. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69 (2004) 1-5
35. Watts (op cit. at Ref. 12)
36. Shah P. Network destruction: the structural implications of downsizing. Academy of Management Journal 43 (2000) 101-112
37. Watts (op cit. at Ref. 12)
38. Nishiguchi T., and Beaudet A. The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. Sloan Management Review 40 (1998) 49-59
39. The concept of the strategic community (SC) differs from that of the community of practice (CoP), and knowledge boundaries (including different thought worlds and specialized fields) exist among actors forming SCs. See Chapter 1 in M. Kodama, The Strategic Community-Based Firm, Palgrave Macmillan, UK (2007a), and Chapter 1 in Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 11).
40. See, for example. Roethlisberger F. The Elusive Phenomena: An Autobiographical Account of My Work in the Field of Organisational Behavior at the Harvard Business School (1977), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
41. White D., and Houseman M. The navigability of strong ties: small worlds, tie strength, and network topology. Complexity 8 (2003) 82-86
42. Watts and Strogatz(op cit. at Ref. 14).
43. See, for example. Wasserman S., and Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994), Cambridge University Press, New York
44. Faust K. Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks 19 (1997) 157-191
45. Watts (op cit. at Ref. 12).
46. Here I will briefly mention the research processes from which the architecture of the knowledge integration framework is derived. With regard to the vertical value chain model, I have analyzed the interrelationship (degree of vertical integration) of business activities within the firm, the transactional relationships (including contract details, contract terms, and power relationships) and knowledge sharing (degree of information sharing and collaboration) among firms, and the value networks that build business models. I undertook structural analysis of project organisations within the firm for the multi-layered model, and analyzed the business model forms arising among firms through strategic alliances and joint development, their processes, and the degree of knowledge sharing for the horizontal value chain and complementary model.
47. See, for example. Harrigan R. Formulating vertical integration strategies. Academy of Management Review 9 4 (1984) 638-652
48. Hill L., and Hoskisson E. Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Academy of Management Review 12 (1987) 331-341
49. Williamson E. The economics of organisations: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 3 (1981) 548-557
50. Williamson E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985), Free Press, New York
51. Afuah N., and Bahram N. The hypercube of innovation. Research Policy 24 (1995) 51-76
52. Balakrishnan S., and Wernerfelt B. Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal 7 (1986) 347-359
53. Afuah A. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change?. Academy of Management Journal 44 6 (2001) 1211-1228
54. Pisano (op cit. at Ref. 8)
55. Fine H. Clock speed: winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage (1998), Perseus Books
56. Fine H. Clock speed-based strategies for supply chain design. Production and Operations Management 9 3 (2000) 213-221
57. Harrigan (op cit. at Ref. 23).
58. See Pisano (op cit. at Ref. 7).
59. Japan's corporate managers possess thought world and knowledge redundancy related to individual work duties and specializations founded on cross-over career paths. See Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 11), Chapter 1 for details.
60. See, for example. Kodama M. Knowledge Innovation - Strategic Management As Practice (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing, UK
61. Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 18)
62. Leonard-Barton D. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1995), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
63. Stacey R. The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change process. Strategic Management Journal 16 6 (1995) 477-495
64. Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of 'Sticky' local information. Management Science 44 5 (1998) 629-644
65. There are also exceptions to the notion that creativity cannot exist in the absence of vertically integrated elements. Apple's innovative and creative iTunes and iPod in the music distribution business and Dell's PC business model, for example, arose from horizontally specialized industry structures, although these businesses also include vertically integrated elements. The Apple music distribution business model resembles that of DoCoMo's i-mode. With Apple, each stakeholder maintains win-win relationships within a vertical value chain comprising content (music labels), Apple itself (overall coordinator of the value chain and determiner of iPod product planning and architecture), and vendors (iPod design, manufacturing, and support) while undertaking loose vertical integration (conversely, the vertical value chain of Japan's mobile phone business is tightly integrated). Dell, moreover, simultaneously pursues the benefits of efficiency through vertical disintegration of business activity outsourcing and tight-knit coordination activities through virtual vertical integration exploiting ICT. See. Magretta J. The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell computer's Michael Dell. Harvard Business Review 76 2 (1998) 72-85
66. For examples relating to conceptual papers analyzing the dynamics of industry from analogies with living ecosystems, see F. Moore, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harvard Business Review 71(3), 75-86 (1993).
67. Regarding Social ecology, see. Bateson G. Mind and Nature (1979), Brockman, Inc., New York
68. Norgaard R. Development Betrayed (1994), Routledge, London, UK
69. Regarding dialectical naturalism, see. Bookchin M. The philosophy of social ecology: essays on dialectical naturalism (1990), Black Rose Books Ltd, US
70. Bookchin (1990) grasps people as living creatures who possess the ability to create, select, transform, or restructure their own environment as active agents of natural and social systems, and raise ethical questions of what should be done. The word 'dialectic' as used by Bookchin includes the meaning of creating mutual contradictions as the essence of all kinds of movement, life, and activities in the world, and leveraging those oppositions to reintegrate and emerge at a higher-order stage. Accordingly his concept is termed 'dialectical naturalism.' DoCoMo's achievement in pioneering the development and popularization of Internet and multimedia mobile communications services with the innovations of i-mode and 3G mobile phone services, featured in this paper, is a prominent new case of this 'dialectical naturalism.' Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 10)
71. Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 11).
72. For key literature on complex adaptive systems, see. Prigogine I. The End of Certainty (1996), The Free Press, New York
73. Kauffman A. At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organisation andcomplexity (1995), London Viking
74. As literature researching the relationship between social ecological theory and complex adaptive theory, see. Marten G. Human Ecology (2001), Earthscan Publication Ltd, US
75. Levin S. Fragile Dominion (1999), Perseus Publishing, US
76. For literature analyzing complex adaptive systems from the viewpoint of administrative science, see. Morel B., and Ramanujam R. Through the looking glass of complexity: the dynamics of organisations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organisation Science 10 3 (1999) 278-293
77. Stacey (op cit. at Ref. 27)
78. Burgelman R. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 2 (1983) 223-244
79. Brown L., and Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentless shifting organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997) 1-34
80. Anderson P. Complexity theory and organisation science. Organisation Science 10 2 (1999) 216-232
81. Meyer A., Gaba V., and Colwell K. Organizing far from equilibrium: non-linear change in organisational fields. Organisation Science 16 5 (2005) 456-473
82. For key literature on dialectical management theory, see op cit. at Ref. 10.
83. Case studies of co-evolution from the dialectic view have also been reported outside Japan's mobile phone business. Examples include Microsoft, Cisco, and Intel for the US-centred IT industry, Taiwan's TSMC for the semiconductor industry, and Wal-Mart for the retail industry. See. Gawer A., and Cusumano M. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (2002), Harvard Business School Press, USA
84. Iansiti M., and Levien R. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability (2004), Harvard Business School Press, USA
85. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society (1984), University of California Press, Berkeley
86. For literature discussing strategic alliances network from the standpoint of Giddens's theory see, for example. Sydow J., and Windeler A. Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: a structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organisation Science 9 3 (1998) 265-284
87. For literature discussing NTT DoCoMo's business development processes from the standpoint of Giddens's theory, see Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 10).
88. Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 11).
89. For example. Baldwin Y., and Clark B. Design Rules. The Power of Moduarity vol. 1 (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
90. Clark B. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy 14 2 (1985) 235-251
91. Simon A. The architecture of complexity: hierarchic systems. In: Simon H.A. (Ed). The Science of the Artificial. 3rd ed (1996), MA MIT Press, Cambridge
92. Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 18).
93. For representative literature on qualitative studies, refer to the following. Glaser B., and Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1967), Aldine, Chicago
94. Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists (1987), Cambridge University Press, New York
95. Atkinson P., and Hammersley M. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 105-117
96. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (1989) 532-550
97. For example. Sturgeon T. Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organisation. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 3 (2002) 451-496
98. Lichtenberg F. R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences (1992), National Bureau of Economic Research Inc, US
99. Christensen M., Raynor M., and Verlinden M. Skate to where the money will be. Harvard Business Review 79 10 (2001) 72-83
100. For key literature on unbundling discussion, see. Hegel J., and Singer M. Unbundling the corporation. March-April. Harvard Business Review 77 2 (1999) 133-141 and Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 18)
101. For key literature on tacit knowledge through bundling discussion, see. Teece D.J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: the role of firm structure and industrial context. In: Nonaka I., and Teece D.J. (Eds). Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization (2001), Sage Publications, London
102. For key literature on synthesizing capability, see. Nonaka I., and Toyama R. A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (2002) 995-1009 and Kodama (op cit. at Ref. 12)
103. For key literature on interaction through productive and creative friction, see. Hagel III J., and Brown J.S. Productive friction. Harvard Business Review 83 2 (2005) 139-145 and Leonard-Barton (op cit. at Ref. 27)