The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 162-177

  Wallin, Martin W ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Network analysis; Review; Spin off

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866259471     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.162     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857-875.
2. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology in the real world. London, England: Macmillan.
4. Chesbrough, H. (2002). Graceful exits and missed opportunities: Xerox's management of its technology spin-off organizations. Business History Review, 76(4), 803-837.
5. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The governance and performance of Xerox's technology spin-off companies. Research Policy 32(3), 403-421.
6. Cooper, A. C. (1971). Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM 18(1), 2-6.
7. Copeland, T., Weston, J., & Shastri, K. (2005). Financial theory and corporate policy. New York, NY: Pearson Addison Wesley.
8. Cornelius, B., Landstrom, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398.
9. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A cocitation analysis. MIS Quarterly 11(3), 341-353.
10. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dorfman, N. S. (1983). Route 128: The development of a regional high technology economy. Research Policy, 12(4), 299-316.
12. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing - Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press.
13. Garnsey, E. (1998). A theory of the early growth of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 523-556.
14. Ito, K. (1995). Japanese spinoffs: Unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 431-146.
15. Ito, K., & Rose, E. L. (1994). The genealogical structure of Japanese firms - Parent-subsidiary relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 35-51.
16. Johansson, M. (2007). Corporate spin-offs and the significance of founders' informal relations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 789-806.
17. Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389.
18. Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy-Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28(5), 298-313.
19. Kudla, R. J., & Mclnish, T. H. (1981). The microeconomic consequences of an involuntary corporate spin-off. Sloan Management Review, 22(4), 41-46.
20. Lindholm Dahlstrand, A. (1997a). Entrepreneurial spin-off enterprises in Göteborg, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 5(5), 659-673.
21. Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å. (1997b). Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms. Research Policy, 26(3), 331-344.
22. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U. S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106.
23. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981-993.
24. Marshakova, I. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2-Informatsionnye Protsessy I Sistemy, 6, 3-8.
25. Martinsons, M. G., Everett, J. E., & Chan, K. (2001). Mapping the scholarly development of strategic management. Journal of Information Science, 27(2), 101-110.
26. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space-A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.
27. McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature - An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.
28. McQueen, D. H., & Wallmark, J. T. (1982). Spin-off companies from Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation, 1, 305-315.
29. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy 35(2), 289-308.
30. Oakey, R. (1995). High-technology new firms: Variable barriers to growth. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing.
31. Parhankangas, A. (1999). Disintegration of technological competencies. An empirical study of divestments through spin-off arrangements. Espoo, Finland: Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Institute of Strategy and International Business, Helsinki University of Technology.
32. Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: A base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy 32(3), 463-481.
33. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of Jasis 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
34. Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(1), 7-20.
35. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the local of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
36. Ramos-Rodriguez, A. R., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
37. Reader, D., & Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 417-441.
38. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39. Roberts, E. B., & Weiner, H. A. (1968). New enterprises on Route 128. Science Journal, 4(12), 78-83.
40. Rose, E. L., & Ito, K. (2005). Widening the family circle: Spin-offs in the Japanese service sector. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 9-26.
41. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D. & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
42. Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 809-829.
43. Seward, J. K., & Walsh, J. P. (1996). The governance and control of voluntary corporate spin-offs. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 25-39.
44. Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature - New measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
45. Small, H. G. (1977). Co-citation model of a scientific specialty - Longitudinal-study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
46. Stahl, M. J., Leap, T. L., & Wei, Z. Z. (1988). Publication in leading management journals as a measure of institutional research productivity. Academy of Management Journal 31(3), 707-720.
47. Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. J. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal 20(3), 279-296.
48. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. (2004). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
49. Utterback, J. M. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183, 620-626.
50. von Krogh, G., Haefliger S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly 36(2), 649-676.
51. von Krogh, G., Rossi Lamastra, C, & Haefliger S. (2011). Phenomenon-based research in management and organization science: Towards a strategy. Long Range Planning, 36(2), 649-676.
52. Wallin, M. W. (2007). Innovation outside: When spin-off firms and developer communities change the boundaries of the firm (PhD dissertation). Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
53. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social networks: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Westney, L. C. H. (1998). Historical rankings of science and technology: A citationist perspective. The Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3310410.0001.
55. White, H. D., & Griffith., B. C. (1981). Author cocitation - A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
56. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 197'2-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
57. Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Beckstead, S. M. (1989). Spin-offs: what are the gains? The Journal of Business Strategy, 10(2), 29-32.
58. Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Daellenbach, U. S. (1992). Spin-off performance - A case of overstated expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 433-447.
59. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy 35(4), 481-501.