Advances, interactions, and future developments in the CNS, phenix, and rosetta structural biology software Systems

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 265-287

  Adams, Paul D ^a,b   Baker, David ^c   Brunger, Axel T ^d   Das, Rhiju ^e   Di Maio, Frank ^c   Read, Randy J ^f   Richardson, David C ^g   Richardson, Jane S ^g   Terwilliger, Thomas C ^h  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^g DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

experimental phasing; low resolution; model building; molecular replacement; physically realistic potential functions; structure refinement; validation

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HYDROGEN BOND; MECHANICAL TORSION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RADIATION INJURY; RIBOSWITCH; RNA STRUCTURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84877745019     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: 19361238     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130253     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunḱoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, et al. 2010. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66:213-211
2. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Read RJ, Richardson JS, et al. 2009. Recent developments in phasing and structure refinement for macromolecular crystallography. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:566-722
3. Adams PD, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Brünger AT. 1997. Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5018-233
4. Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, EcholsN,Headd JJ, Moriarty NW,et al. 2012. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68:352-677
5. Arendall WB III, Tempel W, Richardson JS, ZhouW,Wang S, et al. 2005. A test of enhancing model accuracy in high-throughput crystallography. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 6:1-111
6. BermanHM,Henrick K, Nakamura H. 2003. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10:9800
7. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, et al. 1983. CHARMM: A programm for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4:187-2177
8. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. 1998. Crystallography & NMR system (CNS): A new software system for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54:905-211
9. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Fromme P, Fromme R, Levitt M, Schroeder GF. 2012. Improving the accuracy of macromolecular structure refinement at 7 °A resolution. Structure 20:957-666
10. Brunger AT, Das D, Deacon AM, Grant J, Terwilliger TC, et al. 2012. Application of DEN refinement and automated model building to a difficult case of molecular-replacement phasing: The structure of a putative succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Acta Crystallogr. D 68:391-4033
11. Brunger AT, Kuriyan J, Karplus M. 1987. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science 235:458-600
12. Bunḱoczi G, Read RJ. 2011. Improvement of molecular-replacement models with Sculptor. Acta Crystallogr. D 67:303-122
13. Chang G, Roth CB, Reyes CL, Pornillos O, Chen YJ, Chen AP. 2006. Retraction. Science 314:18755
14. Chen VB, Arendall WB III, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, et al. 2010. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66:12-211
15. Chen VB, Davis IW, Richardson DC. 2009. KiNG (Kinemage Next Generation): A versatile interactive molecular and scientific visualization program. Protein Sci. 18:2403-88
16. Chou FC, Sripakdeevong P, Dibrov SM, Hermann T, Das R. 2013. Correcting pervasive errors in RNA crystallography through enumerative structure prediction. Nat. Methods 10:74-766
17. Cowtan K. 2006. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. Acta Crystallogr. D 62:1002-111
18. Cruickshank DWJ. 1965. Notes for authors; anisotropic parameters. Acta Crystallogr. 19:1533
19. Cruz JA, Blanchet MF, Boniecki M, Bujnicki JM, Chen SJ, et al. 2012. RNA-Puzzles: A CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction. RNA 18:610-255
20. Das R, Baker D. 2009. Prospects for de novo phasing with de novo protein models. Acta Crystallogr. D 65:169-755
21. Dauter Z, Dauter M, Dodson EJ. 2002. Jolly SAD. Acta Crystallogr. D 58:494-5066
22. Davis IW, Arendall WB III, Richardson DC, Richardson JS. 2006. The backrub motion: How protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 14:265-744
23. Davis IW, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 2004. MolProbity: Structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W615-6199
24. de La Fortelle E, BricogneG. 1997. Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement for the multiple isomorphous replacement and multiwavelength anomalous diffraction methods. Methods Enzymol. 276:472-944
25. DeLano WL. 2002. The PyMol Molecular Graphics System. http://www.pymol.org
26. Delarue M, Dumas P. 2004. On the use of low-frequency normalmodes to enforce collectivemovements in refining macromolecular structural models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:6957-622
27. DePristo MA, de Bakker PIW, Blundell TL. 2004. Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by x-ray crystallography. Structure 12:831-388
28. DePristo MA, de Bakker PIW, Johnson RJK, Blundell TL. 2005. Crystallographic refinement by knowledge-based exploration of complex energy landscapes. Structure 13:1311-199
29. Diamond R. 1990. On the use of normal modes in thermal parameter refinement: Theory and application to the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Acta Crystallogr. A 46:425-355
30. DiMaio F, Terwilliger T, Read R, Wlodawer A, Oberdorfer G, et al. 2011. Improving molecular replacement by density- and energy-guided protein structure optimization. Nature 473:540-433
31. DiMaio F, Tyka M, Baker M, Chiu W, Baker D. 2009. Refinement of protein structures into lowresolution density maps using Rosetta. J. Mol. Biol. 392:181-900
32. Dunkle JA, Wang L, Feldman MB, Pulk A, Chen VB, et al. 2011. Structures of the bacterial ribosome in classical and hybrid states of tRNA binding. Science 332:981-844
33. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, ScottWG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66:486-5011
34. Engh RA, Huber R. 1991. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A 47:392-4000
35. Fabiola F, Bertram R, Korostelev A, ChapmanMS. 2002. An improved hydrogen bond potential: Impact on medium resolution protein structures. Protein Sci. 11:1415-233
36. Fenn TD, Schnieders MJ, Mustyakimov M, Langan P, Pande VS, Brunger AT. 2011. Reintroducing electrostatics into macromolecular crystallographic refinement: Application to neutron crystallography and DNA hydration. Structure 19:523-333
37. Geman SA, McClure DE. 1987. Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction. Bull. Int. Stat. Inst. LII-4:5-211
38. Giorgetti A, Raimondo D, Miele AE, Tramontano A. 2005. Evaluating the usefulness of protein structure models for molecular replacement. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl. 2):ii72-766
39. Headd JJ, Echols N, Afonine PV,Grosse-KunstleveRW, Chen VB, et al. 2012. Use of knowledgebased restraints in phenix.refine to improve macromolecular refinement at low resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D 68:681-900
40. HendricksonWA. 1985. Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures. Methods Enzymol. 115:252-700
41. HendricksonWA, Horton JR, LeMaster DM. 1990. Selenomethionyl proteins produced for analysis by multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD): A vehicle for direct determination of three-dimensional structure. EMBO J. 9:1665-722
42. Jack A, Levitt M. 1983. Refinement of large structures by simultaneous minimization of energy and R factor. Acta Crystallogr. A 34:931-355
43. Joachimiak A. 2009. High-throughput crystallography for structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:573-844
44. Kallen J,Welzenbach K, Ramage P, Geyl D, KriwackiR, et al. 1999. Structural basis for LFA-1 inhibition upon lovastatin binding to the CD11a I-domain. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1-99
45. Keating KS, Pyle AM. 2010. Semiautomated model building for RNA crystallography using a directed rotameric approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:8177-822
46. Keating KS, Pyle AM. 2012. RCrane: Semi-automated RNA model building. Acta Crystallogr. D 68:985- 955
47. Keegan RM,WinnMD. 2008. MrBUMP: An automated pipeline for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D 64:119-244
48. Khatib F, DiMaio F, Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Cooper S, et al. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:1175-777
49. Kim JJ, Casteel DE,Huang G, Kwon TH, Ren RK, et al. 2011. Co-crystal structures ofPKGIβ(92-227) with cGMP and cAMP reveal the molecular details of cyclic-nucleotide binding. PLoS ONE 6:e184133
50. Korostelev A, Trakhanov S, Laurberg M, Noller HF. 2006. Crystal structure of a 70S ribosome-tRNA complex reveals functional interactions and rearrangements. Cell 126:1065-777
51. Kovalevsky AY, Liu F, Leshchenko S, Ghosh AK, Louis JM, et al. 2006. Ultra-high resolution crystal structure ofHIV-1 protease mutant reveals two binding sites for clinical inhibitor TMC114. J. Mol. Biol. 363:161-733
52. Krätzner R, Debreczeni JE, Pape T, Schneider TR, Wentzel A, et al. 2005. Structure of Ecballium elaterium trypsin inhibitor II (EETI-II): A rigid molecular scaffold. Acta Crystallogr. D 61:1255-622
53. Langer G, Cohen SX, Lamzin VS, Perrakis A. 2008. Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7. Nat. Protoc. 3:1171-799
54. Levitt M, Sander C, Stern PS. 1985. Protein normal-mode dynamics: Trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 181:423-477
55. Li M, DiMaio F, Zhou D, Gustchina A, Lubkowski J, et al. 2011. Crystal structure of XMRV protease differs from the structures of other retropepsins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:227-299
56. Liu Q, Dahmane T, Zhang Z, Assur Z, Brasch J, et al. 2012. Structures from anomalous diffraction of native biological macromolecules. Science 336:1033-377
57. Long F, Vagin AA, Young P, Murshudov GN. 2008. BALBES: A molecular-replacement pipeline. Acta Crystallogr. D 64:125-322
58. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB III, de Bakker PIW,Word JM, et al. 2003. Structure validation by Cαgeometry: Hψand Cβdeviation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 50:437-500
59. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 2000. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 40:389-4088
60. Luzzati V. 1952. Traitement statistique des erreurs dans la determination des structures cristallines. Acta Crystallogr. 5:802-100
61. MacCallum JL, Ṕerez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, et al. 2009. Assessment of the proteinstructure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins 77(Suppl. 9):66-800
62. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, et al. 2007. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40:658-744
63. McCoy AJ, Storoni LC, Read RJ. 2004. Simple algorithm for a maximum-likelihood SAD function. Acta Crystallogr. D 60:1220-288
64. Montange RK, Batey RT. 2006. Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element. Nature 441:11722
65. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. 2011. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) - round IX. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 79(S10):1-2077
66. Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, et al. 2011. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67:355-677
67. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. 1997. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53:240-555
68. Ondŕaček J. 2005. HipHop.Anovel refinementmethod for protein structures. Acta Crystallogr.A61:C1633
69. Ondŕaček J, Mesters Jr. 2006. An ensemble of crystallographic models enables the description of novel bromate-oxoanion species trapped within a protein crystal. Acta Crystallogr. D 62:996-10011
70. Pannu NS, Read RJ. 2004. The application of multivariate statistical techniques improves singlewavelength anomalous diffraction phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D 60:22-277
71. Perrakis A, Morris R, Lamzin VS. 1999. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:458-633
72. Petsko GA. 2000. The grail problem. Genome Biol 1:Comment 002-002.22
73. Pokkuluri PR, Duke NE, Wood SJ, Cotta MA, Li X, et al. 2011. Structure of the catalytic domain of glucuronoyl esterase Cip2 from Hypocrea jecorina. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 79:2588-922
74. Pozharski E. 2010. Percentile-based spread: A more accurate way to compare crystallographic models. Acta Crystallogr. D 66:970-788
75. Qian B, Raman S, Das R, Bradley P,McCoy AJ, et al. 2007. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450:259-644
76. Read RJ. 1986. Improved Fourier coefficients for maps using phases from partial structures with errors. Acta Crystallogr. A 42:140-499
77. Description of the suite of validation tools to be applied to new PDB structure depositions. 77. Read RJ, Adams PD, Arendall WB III, Brunger AT, Emsley P, et al. 2011. A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank. Structure 19:1395-4122
78. Read RJ, Chavali G. 2007. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins 69(Suppl. 8):27-377
79. Read RJ, McCoy AJ. 2011. Using SAD data in Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D 67:338-444
80. Rice LM, Brunger AT. 1994. Torsion angle dynamics: Reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:277-900
81. rfsti Richardson JS, Schneider B, Murray LW, Kapral GJ, Immormino RM, et al. 2008. RNA backbone: Consensus all-angle conformers and modular string nomenclature (an RNA ontology contribution). RNA 14:465-811
82. Rodŕiguez DD, Grosse C, Himmel S, Gonźalez C, de Ilarduya IM, et al. 2009. Crystallographic ab initio protein structure solution below atomic resolution. Nat. Methods 6:651-533
83. Rohl CA, StraussCEM,Misura KMS, BakerD. 2004. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383:66-933
84. Schr öder GF, Brunger AT, Levitt M. 2007. Combining efficient conformational sampling with a deformable elastic network model facilitates structure refinement at low resolution. Structure 15:1630- 411
85. Schro? der GF, Levitt M, Brunger AT. 2010. Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data. Nature 464:1218-222
86. Sheldrick GM, Schneider TR. 1997. SHELXL: High-resolution refinement. Methods Enzymol. 277:319- 433
87. Smart OS, Womack TO, Flensburg C, Keller P, PaciorekW, et al. 2012. Exploiting structure similarity in refinement: AutomatedNCS and target-structure restraints in BUSTER. Acta Crystallogr.D68:368-800
88. Sripakdeevong P, Kladwang W, Das R. 2011. An enumerative stepwise ansatz enables atomic-accuracy RNA loop modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:20573-788
89. Strop P, Brzustowicz MR, Brunger AT. 2007. Ab initio molecular- replacement phasing for symmetric helical membrane proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D 63:188-966
90. Szep S, Wang J, Moore PB. 2003. The crystal structure of a 26-nucleotide RNA containing a hook-turn. RNA 9:44-511
91. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks CL III. 2004. Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into lowresolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 337:985-999
92. Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Adams PD, Moriarty NW, et al. 2007. Interpretation of ensembles created by multiple iterative rebuilding of macromolecular models. Acta Crystallogr. D 63:597-6100
93. Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Adams PD, et al. 2008. Iterativebuild OMIT maps: Map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias. Acta Crystallogr. D 64:515-244
94. Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Zwart PH, et al. 2007. Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D 64:61-699
95. Terwilliger TC, Read RJ, Adams PD, Brunger AT, Afonine PV, et al. 2012. Improved crystallographic models through iterated local density-guided model deformation and reciprocal space refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 68:861-700
96. Tickle IJ, Laskowski RA, Moss DS. 1998. Error estimates of protein structure coordinates and deviations from standard geometry by full-matrix refinement of gammaB- and betaB2-crystallin. Acta Crystallogr. D 54:243-522
97. Uson I, Pohl E, Schneider TR, Dauter Z, Schmidt A, et al. 1999. 1.7 ̊A structure of the stabilized REIv mutant T39K. Application of local NCS restraints. Acta Crystallogr. D 55:1158-677
98. Vagin AA, Steiner RA, Lebedev AA, Potterton L, McNicholas S, et al. 2004. REFMAC5 dictionary: Organization of prior chemical knowledge and guidelines for its use. Acta Crystallogr. D 60:2184-955
99. Watson JD, Crick FH. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171:737-388
100. Weis WI, Brunger AT, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 1990. Refinement of the influenza virus hemagglutinin by simulated annealing. J. Mol. Biol. 212:737-611
101. Word JM, Lovell SC, LaBean TH, Taylor HC, Zalis ME, et al. 1999. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: Small-probe contact dotswith explicit hydrogen atoms. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1711- 333
102. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 1999. Asparagine and glutamine: Using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1735-477