Enhanced osteogenic fate and function of MC3T3-E1 cells on nanoengineered polystyrene surfaces with nanopillar and nanopore arrays

Biofabrication

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Cha, Kyoung Je ^a   Hong, Jung Min ^a   Cho, Dong Woo ^a   Kim, Dong Sung ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANODIC ALUMINUM OXIDE; CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HARDNESS AND ELASTIC MODULUS; NICKEL ELECTROFORMING; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS;

ANODIC OXIDATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BINDING SITES; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTACT ANGLE; ELECTROCHEMICAL OXIDATION; ELECTROFORMING; HARDNESS; MORPHOLOGY; NANOPORES; POLYSTYRENES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WETTING;

NANOSTRUCTURES;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BETA1 INTEGRIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM; FIBRONECTIN; NANOMATERIAL; NICKEL; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NANOPORE; OSTEOBLAST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE MICROARRAY; WETTABILITY; ARTICLE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD29; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; FIBRONECTINS; MICE; NANOPORES; NANOSTRUCTURES; NICKEL; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYSTYRENES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84877742211     PISSN: 17585082     EISSN: 17585090     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025007     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Lim J Y and Donahue H J 2007 Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning Tissue Eng. 13 1879-91
2. Martinez E, Engel E, Planell J A and Samitier J 2009 Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour Ann. Anat. 191 126-35
3. Cukierman E, Pankov R and Yamada K M 2002 Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14 633-9
4. Jäger M, Zilkens C, Zanger K and Krauspe R 2007 Significance of nano- and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2007 69036
5. Scopelliti P E, Borgonovo A, Indrieri M, Giorgetti L, Bongiorno G, Carbone R, Podesta A and Milani P 2010 The effect of surface nanometre-scale morphology on protein adsorption Plos One 5 e11862
6. Clem W C, Konovalov V V, Chowdhury S, Vohra Y K, Catledge S A and Bellis S L 2006 Mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and spreading on microwave plasma-nitrided titanium alloy J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76A 279-87
7. Vandrovcová M and Bačáková L 2011 Adhesion, growth and differentiation of osteoblasts on surface-modified materials developed for bone implants Physiol. Res. 60 403-17
8. Burdick J A and Vunjak-Novakovic G 2009 Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation Tissue Eng. A 15 205-19
9. 2 nanotubes J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 78A 97-103
10. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J, Hardouin P and Landolt D 2004 Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography Biomaterials 25 2695-711
11. Schwartz Fo H O, Novaes A B Jr, de Castro L M S, Rosa A L and de Oliveira P T 2007 In vitro osteogenesis on a microstructured titanium surface with additional submicron-scale topography Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18 333-44
12. Zhao G, Zinger O, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Landolt D and Boyan B D 2006 Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17 258-64
13. Khang D, Choi J, Im Y, Kim Y, Jang J, Kang S S, Nama T, Song J and Park J 2012 Role of subnano-, nano- and submicron-surface features on osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Biomaterials 33 5997-6007
14. Tseng A A, Chen K, Chen C D and Ma K J 2003 Electron beam lithography in nanoscale fabrication: recent development IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. 26 141-9
15. Brueck S R J 2005 Optical and interferometric lithography - nanotechnology enablers Proc. IEEE 93 1704-21
16. Dalby M J, Riehlea M O, Johnstone H, Affrossman S and Curtis A S G 2002 In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography Biomaterials 23 2945-54
17. Lee J, Cuddihy M J and Kotov N A 2008 Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art Tissue Eng. B 14 61-86
18. Veith M, Aktas O C, Metzger W, Sossong D, Ullah Wazir H, Grobelsek I, Putz N, Wennemuth G, Pohlemann T and Oberringer M 2010 Adhesion fibroblasts on micro- and nanostructured surfaces prepared by chemical vapor deposition and pulsed laser treatment Biofabrication 2 035001
19. Kim T G and Park T G 2006 Biomimicking extracellular matrix: cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh Tissue Eng. 12 221-33
20. Gates B D, Xu Q B, Stewart M, Ryan D, Willson C G and Whitesides G M 2005 New approaches to nanofabrication: molding, printing, and other techniques Chem. Rev. 105 1171-96
21. Charest J L, Bryant L E, Garcia A J and King W P 2004 Hot embossing for micropatterned cell substrates Biomaterials 25 4767-75
22. Engel E, Martinez E, Mills C A, Funes M, Planell J A and Samitier J 2009 Mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on microstructured poly (methyl methacrylate) substrates Ann. Anat. 191 136-44
23. Cha K J, Park K S, Kang S W, Cha B H, Lee B K, Han I B, Shin D A, Kim D S and Lee S H 2011 Effect of replicated polymeric substrate with lotus surface structure on adipose-derived stem cell behaviors Macromol. Biosci. 11 1357-63
24. Van Kooten T G, Whitesides J F and Von Recum A F 1998 Influence of silicon (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 43 1-14
25. Berthier E, Young E W and Beebe D 2012 Engineers are from PDMS-land, biologists are from polystyrenia Lab Chip 12 1224-37
26. Cha K J, Lee B-K and Kim D S 2011 Nanofabrication of nickel stamp for replication of polymer multilevel nanolens arrays via modified two-step anodization process Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 50 06GG12
27. Lee B-K, Cha K J and Kwon T H 2009 Fabrication of polymer micro/nano-hybrid lens array by microstructured anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) mold Microelectron. Eng. 86 857-60
28. Heckele M and Schomburg W K 2004 Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers J. Micromech. Microeng. 14 R1-14
29. Whitesides G M, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X Y and Ingber D E 2001 Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3 335-73
30. Ross A M, Jiang Z, Bastmeyer M and Lahann J 2012 Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity Small 8 336-55
31. Kuo C and Chen C 2009 Technique for self-assembly of Tin nano-particles on anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) templates Mater. Trans. JIM 50 1102-4
32. Bettinger C J, Langer R and Borenstein T B 2009 Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 5406-15
33. Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S and Khademhosseini A 2012 Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface Biomaterials 33 5230-46
34. Yeo J, Ryu J, Lee B-K, Byeon E, Kwon T H and Kim D S 2010 Theoretical and experimental characterization of wettability of various nanolens arrayed polymer surfaces replicated with nanodimpled aluminum mold insert Microsyst. Technol. 16 1425-30
35. Tamada Y and Ikada Y 2004 Fibroblast growth on polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 783-9
36. Briscoe B J, Fiori L and Pelillo E 1998 Nano-indentation of polymeric surfaces J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 2395-405
37. Pincus Z and Theriott J A 2007 Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis J. Microsc. (Oxf) 227 140-56
38. Andersson A-S, Bäckhed F, von Euler A, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D and Kasemo B 2003 Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production Biomaterials 24 3427-36
39. Sun J, Xiao W, Tang Y, Li K and Fan H 2012 Biomimetic interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels based on methacrylated alginate and collagen for 3D pre-osteoblast spreading and osteogenic differentiation Soft Matter 8 2398-404
40. Lipski A M, Pino C J, Haselton F R, Chen I W and Shastri V P 2008 The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function Biomaterials 29 3836-46
41. Zheng X R and Zhang X 2011 Microsystems for cellular force measurement: a review J. Micromech. Microeng. 21 054003
42. Yim E K F, Darling E M, Kulangara K, Guilak F and Leong K W 2010 Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells Biomaterials 31 1299-306
43. Ghibaudo M, Saez A, Trichet L, Xayaphoummine A, Browaeys J, Silberzan P, Buguin A and Ladoux B 2008 Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions Soft Matter 4 1836-43
44. Goldyn A M, Rioja B A, Spatz J P, Ballestrem C and Kemkemer R 2009 Force-induced cell polarisation is linked to RhoA-driven microtubule-independent focal-adhesion sliding J. Cell Sci. 15 3644-51
45. McBeath R, Pirone D M, Nelson C M, Bhadriraju K and Chen C S 2004 Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment Dev. Cell. 6 483-95
46. Oh S, Brammer K S, Li Y S J, Teng D, Engler A J, Chien S and Jin S 2009 Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 2130-5
47. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate Nano Lett. 7 1686-91
48. Yim E K and Leong K W 2005 Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 1 10-21
49. Chung S H, Son S J and Min J 2010 The nanostructure effect on the adhesion and growth rates of epithelial cells with well-defined nanoporous alumina substrates Nanotechnology 21 125104
50. Globus R K, Doty S B, Lull J C, Holmuhamedov E, Humphries M J and Damsky C H 1998 Fibronectin is a survival factor for differentiated osteoblasts J. Cell Sci. 111 1385-93
51. Gronthos S, Stewart K, Graves S E, Hay S and Simmons P J 1997 Integrin expression and function on human osteoblast-like cells J. Bone Miner. Res. 12 1189-97
52. Lal H, Verma S K, Smith M, Guleria R S, Lu G, Foster D M and Dostal D E 2007 Stretch-induced MAP kinase activation in cardiacmyocytes: differential regulation through b1-integrin and focal adhesion kinase J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 43 137-47
53. Ranella A, Barberoglou M, Bakogianni S, Fotakis C and Stratakis E 2010 Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures Acta Biomater. 6 2711-20
54. Discher D E, Janmey P and Wang Y L 2005 Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate Science 310 1139-43
55. Engler A J, Sen S, Sweeney H L and Discher D E 2006 Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification Cell 126 677-89
56. Evans N D, Minelli C, Gentleman E, LaPointe V, Patankar S N, Kallivretaki M, Chen X, Roberts C J and Stevens M M 2009 Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells Eur. Cell. Mater. 18 1-14
57. He F, Zhang F, Yang G, Wang X and Zhao S 2010 Enhanced initial proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on HF/HNO3 solution treated nanostructural titanium surface Oral Surg. Oral Med. O. 110 e13-22
58. Dalby M J, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle M O, Herzyk P, Wilkinson C D W and Oreffo R O C 2007 The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder Nature Mater. 6 997-1003