Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-14

  Van Kooten, Theo G ^a,c   Whitesides, John F ^b   Von Recum, Andreas F ^a  

^a Clemson University   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell cycle; MTT; Silicone; Texture

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; BIOASSAY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SKIN; SURFACE STRUCTURE; TISSUE;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE ANALYSIS; FIBRONECTIN PREADSORPTION; HUMAN SKIN FIBROBLAST PROLIFERATION;

SILICONES;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; FIBRONECTIN;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL PROLIFERATION; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MITOSIS RATE; SILICONE PROSTHESIS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SILICONES; SKIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TETRAZOLIUM SALTS; THIAZOLES;

EID: 0032030708     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199821)43:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-T     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kossovsky, N.; Freiman, C. J. Immunology of silicone breast implants. J. Biomater. Appl. 8:237-246; 1994.
2. Sanchez-Guerrero, J.; Schur, P. H.; Sergent, J. S.; Liang, M. H. Silicone breast implants and rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2:158-168; 1994.
3. Granchi, D.; Cavedagna, D.; Ciapetti, G.; et al. Silicone breast implants: the role of immune system on capsular contracture formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29:197-202; 1995.
4. Kasper, C. S. Histologic features of breast capsules reflect surface configuration and composition of silicone bag implants. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 102:655-659; 1994.
5. von Recum, A. F. Soft-tissue adhesion to implant materials. Esterhai, J. L.; Gristina, A. G.; Poss, R., Eds. Musculoskeletal Infection. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1992:191-203.
6. Campbell, C. E.; von Recum, A. F. Microtopography and soft tissue response. J. Invest. Surg. 2:51-74; 1989.
7. Wu, E. Y.-C. Surface texture versus material type (titanium, hydroxyapatite, and silicone): a biocompatibility study in rabbits. Clemson University; Ph.D. Thesis; 1991.
8. Chehroudi, B.; Gould, T. R. L.; Brunette, D. M. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24:1203-1219; 1990.
9. Gailit, J.; Clark, R. A. F. Wound repair in the context of extracellular matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:717-725; 1994.
10. Ireland, G. W.; Dopping-Hepenstal, P.; Jordan, P.; O'Neill, C. Effect of patterned surfaces of adhesive islands on the shape, cytoskeleton, adhesion and behaviour of Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 8:19-33; 1987.
11. Singhvi, R.; Kumar, A.; Lopez, G. P.; et al. Engineering cell shape and function. Science 264:696-698; 1994.
12. Watt, F. M.; Jordan, P. W.; O'Neill, C. H. Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5576-5580; 1988.
13. O'Neill, C.; Jordan, P.; Riddle, P.; Ireland, G. Narrow linear strips of adhesive substratum are powerful inducers of both growth and total focal contact area. J. Cell Sci. 95:577-586; 1990.
14. Curtis, A. S. G.; Clark, P. The effects of topographic and mechanical properties of materials on cell behavior. Crit. Rev. Biocompat. 5:343-362; 1990.
15. Singhvi, R.; Stephanopoulos, G.; Wang, D. I. C. Review: effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43:764-771; 1994.
16. von Recum, A. F.; van Kooten, T. G. The influence of microtopography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 7:181-198; 1995.
17. Ciapetti, G.; Cenni, E.; Pratelli, L.; Pizzoferrato, A. In vitro evaluation of cell/biomaterial interaction by MTT assay. Biomaterials 14:359-364; 1993.
18. Schmidt, J.; von Recum, A. F. Texturing of polymer surfaces at the cellular level. Biomaterials 12:385-389; 1991.
19. Den Braber, E. T.; de Ruijter, J. E.; Smits, H. T.; Ginsel, L. A.; von Recum, A. F.; Jansen, J. A. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29:511-518; 1995.
20. Telford, W. G.; King, L. E.; Fraker, P. J. Comparative evaluation of several DNA binding dyes in the detection of apoptosis-associated chromatin degradation by flow cytometry. Cytometry 13:137-143; 1992.
21. Nicoletti, I.; Migliorati, G.; Pagliacci, M. C.; Grignani, F.; Riccardi, C. A rapid and simple method for measuring thymocyte apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 139:271-279; 1991.
22. Darzynkiewicz, Z.; Bruno, S.; Del Bino, G.; et al. Features of apoptotic cells measured by flow cytometry. Cytometry 13:795-808; 1992.
23. Fraker, P. J.; King, L. E.; Lill-Elghanian, D.; Telford, W. G. Quantification of apoptotic events in pure and heterogeneous populations of cells using the flow cytometer. Schwartz, L. M.; Osborne, B. A., Eds. Methods in Cell Biology. Vol. 46, New York: Academic Press; 1995.
24. Majno, G.; Joris, I. Apoptosis, oncosis, and necrosis. An overview of cell death. Am. J. Pathol. 146:3-15; 1995.
25. Humbert, C.; Santisteban, M. S.; Usson, Y.; Robert-Nicoud, M. Intranuclear co-location of newly replicated DNA and PCNA by simultaneous immunofluorescent labelling and confocal microscopy in MCF-7 cells. J. Cell Sci. 103:97-103; 1992.
26. Dekker, A.; Panfil, C.; Valdor, M.; et al. Quantitative methods for in vitro cytotoxicity testing of biomaterials. Cells Mater. 4:101-112; 1994.
27. Nassiri, M. R.; Hanks, C. T.; Cameron, M. J.; Strawn, S. E.; Craig, R. G. Application of flow cytometry to determine the cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate in human cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28:153-158; 1994.