Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production

Biomaterials

Volumn 24, Issue 20, 2003, Pages 3427-3436

  Andersson, Ann Sofie ^a   Bäckhed, Fredrik ^b   Von Euler, Anne ^c   Richter Dahlfors, Agneta ^c   Sutherland, Duncan ^a   Kasemo, Bengt ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cell response; Cytokine; Nanoscale; Nanotopography; Topography; Uroepithelial

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; MORPHOLOGY; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; SUBSTRATES;

CELL MORPHOLOGY;

CELLS;

CYTOKINE; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STELLATE CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 0037708419     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00208-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kasemo B. Biological surface science. Surf Sci. 500:2002;656-677.
2. Dee K.C., Bizios R. Mini-review. proactive biomaterials and bone tissue engineering Biotechnol Bioeng. 50:1996;438-442.
3. Keller J.C. Physical and biological characteristics of implant materials. Adv Dent Res. 13:1999;5-7.
4. Cooper L.F., Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., Felton D.A. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13:1998;163-174.
5. Brunette D.M. In vitro models of biological responses to implants. Adv Dent Res. 13:1999;35-37.
6. Davies J.E. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec. 245:1996;426-445.
7. Schwartz Z., Boyan B.D. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem. 56:1994;340-347.
8. Abrams G.A., Goodman S.L., Nealey P.F., Franco M., Murphy C.J. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res. 299:2000;39-46.
9. Wilkinson C.D.W., Riehle M., Wood M., Gallagher J., Curtis A.S.G. The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 19:2002;263-269.
10. Flemming R.G., Murphy C.J., Abrams G.A., Goodman S.L., Nealey P.F. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 20:1999;573-588.
11. Curtis A., Wilkinson C. Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 19:2001;97-101.
12. Rajnicek A., Britland S., McCaig C. Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz. influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type J Cell Sci. 110(Pt 23):1997;2905-2913.
13. Wojciak-Stothard B., Curtis A., Monaghan W., MacDonald K., Wilkinson C. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Exp Cell Res. 223:1996;426-435.
14. Turner S., Kam L., Isaacson M., Craighead H.G., Shain W., Turner J.N. Cell attachment on silicon nanostructures. J Vac Sci Technol B. 15:1997;2848-2854.
15. Craighead H.G., Turner S.W., Davies R.C., James C., Perez A.M., St John P.M., Isaacson M.S., Kam L., Shain W., Turner J.N.et al. Chemical and topographical surface modifications for control of central nervous system adhesion. Biomed Microdev. 1:1998;49-64.
16. Curtis A.S.G., Casey B., Gallagher J.O., Pasqui D., Wood M.A., Wilkinson C.D.W. Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? Biophys Chem. 94:2001;275-283.
17. Curtis A., Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials. 18:1997;1573-1583.
18. Clark P. Cell behaviour on micropatterned surfaces. Biosens Bioelec. 9:1994;657-661.
19. von Recum A.F., van Kooten T.G. The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 7:1995;181-198.
20. Turner A.M., Dowell N., Turner S.W., Kam L., Isaacson M., Turner J.N., Craighead H.G., Shain W. Attachment of astroglial cells to microfabricated pillar arrays of different geometries. J Biomed Mater Res. 51:2000;430-441.
21. Craighead H.G., James C.D., Turner A.M.P. Chemical and topographical patterning for directed cell attachment. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 5:2001;177-184.
22. Dalby M.J., Yarwood S.J., Riehle M.O., Johnstone H.J., Affrossman S., Curtis A.S. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography. morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands Exp Cell Res. 276:2002;1-9.
23. Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Johnstone H., Affrossman S., Curtis A.S. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials. 23:2002;2945-2954.
24. Bäckhed F., Meijer L., Normark S., Richter-Dahlfors A. TLR4-dependent recognition of lipopolysaccharide by epithelial cells requires sCD14. Cell Microbiol. 4:2002;493-501.
25. Bäckhed F., Soderhall M., Ekman P., Normark S., Richter-Dahlfors A. Induction of innate immune responses by E. coli and purified lipopolysaccharide correlate with organ- and cell-specific expression of Toll-like receptors within the human urinary tract. Cell Microbiol. 3:2001;153-158.
26. Hanarp P., Sutherland D., Gold J., Kasemo B. Nanostructured model biomaterial surfaces prepared by colloidal lithography. Nanostr Mater. 12:1999;429-432.
27. Hanarp P., Sutherland D.S., Gold J., Kasemo B. Control of nanoparticle film structure for colloidal lithography. Colloids Surf A. 214:2003;23-36.
28. Okamoto M., Hattori K., Oyasu R. Interleukin-6 functions as an autocrine growth factor in human bladder carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Int J Cancer. 72:1997;149-154.
29. Kasemo B., Lausmaa J. Surface properties and processes of the biomaterial-tissue interface. Mater Sci Eng C. 1:1994;115-119.
30. Kasemo B., Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dent Res. 13:1999;8-20.
31. Curtis A., Riehle M. Tissue engineering. the biophysical background Phys Med Biol. 46:2001;R47-R65.
32. Hubbell J.A. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Biotechnology (NY). 13:1995;565-576.
33. Ruoslahti E., Obrink B. Common principles in cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res. 227:1996;1-11.
34. Hynes R.O. Cell adhesion. old and new questions Trends Cell Biol. 9:1999;M33-M37.
35. Aplin A.E., Howe A.K., Juliano R.L. Cell adhesion molecules, signal transduction and cell growth. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 11:1999;737-744.
36. Huang S., Ingber D.E. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks Exp Cell Res. 261:2000;91-103.
37. Galbraith C.G., Sheetz M.P. Forces on adhesive contacts affect cell function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 10:1998;566-571.
38. Singhvi R., Stephanopoulos G., Wang D.I.C. Review. effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology Biotechnol Bioeng. 43:1994;764-771.
39. Warn R., Brown D., Dowrick P., Prescott A., Warn A. Cytoskeletal changes associated with cell motility. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 47:1993;325-338.
40. Edwards J.G., Campbell G., Carr M., Edwards C.C. Shapes of cells spreading on fibronectin. measurement of the stellation of bhk21 cells induced by raising cyclic AMP, and of its reversal by serum and lysophosphatidic acid J Cell Sci. 104(Pt 2):1993;399-407.
41. Dunn G.A., Brown A.F. Alignment of fibroblasts on grooved surfaces described by a simple geometric transformation. J Cell Sci. 83:1986;313-340.
42. Glasbey C.A., Horgan G.W. Image analysis for the biological sciences. 1995;Wiley, Chichister, England.
43. Acarturk T.O., Peel M.M., Petrosko P., LaFramboise W., Johnson P.C., DiMilla P.A. Control of attachment, morphology, and proliferation of skeletal myoblasts on silanized glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 44:1999;355-370.
44. Weber I. Computer-assisted morphometry of cell-substratum contacts. Croat Med J. 40:1999;334-339.
45. Mikli V., Kaerdi H., Kulu P., Besterci M. Characterization of powder particle morphology. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Eng. 7:2001;22-34.
46. Rovensky Y.A., Samoilov V.I. Morphogenetic response of cultured normal and transformed fibroblasts, and epitheliocytes, to a cylindrical substratum surface. Possible role for the actin filament bundle pattern. J Cell Sci. 107(Pt 5):1994;1255-1263.
47. Russ J.C. The image processing handbook. 1999;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.