Dynamic modular architecture of protein-protein interaction networks beyond the dichotomy of 'date' and 'party' hubs

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Chang, Xiao ^a   Xu, Tao ^b   Li, Yun ^c   Wang, Kai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84877730113     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01691     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Han, J. D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88-93 (2004).
2. Fraser, H. B. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nat Genet 37, 351-352 (2005).
3. Batada, N. N. et al. Stratus not altocumulus: a new view of the yeast protein interaction network. PLoS Biol 4, e317 (2006).
4. Bertin, N. et al. Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome. PLoS Biol 5, e153 (2007).
5. Batada, N. N. et al. Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction. PLoS Biol 5, e154 (2007).
6. Agarwal, S., Deane, C. M., Porter, M. A. & Jones, N. S. Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol 6, e1000817 (2010).
7. Taylor, I. W. et al. Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome. Nat Biotechnol 27, 199-204 (2009).
8. Kim, P. M., Lu, L. J., Xia, Y. & Gerstein, M. B. Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314, 1938-1941 (2006). (Pubitemid 46026118)
9. Wang, H. & Zheng, H. Correlation of genomic features with dynamic modularity in the yeast interactome: a view from the structural perspective. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 11, 244-250 (2012).
10. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008).
11. Vallabhajosyula, R. R., Chakravarti, D., Lutfeali, S., Ray, A. & Raval, A. Identifying hubs in protein interaction networks. PLoS One 4, e5344 (2009).
12. Mirzarezaee, M., Araabi, B. N.&Sadeghi, M. Features analysis for identification of date and party hubs in protein interaction network of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. BMC Syst Biol 4, 172 (2010).
13. Newman, M. E. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 8577-8582 (2006). (Pubitemid 43878062)
14. Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 7821-7826 (2002). (Pubitemid 34650963)
15. Yook, S. H., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabasi, A. L. Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics 4, 928-942 (2004). (Pubitemid 38445953)
16. Guimera, R. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433, 895-900 (2005). (Pubitemid 40314902)
17. Segal, E. et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet 34, 166-176 (2003). (Pubitemid 36666927)
18. Chang, X., Liu, S., Yu, Y. T., Li,.&Li, Y. Y. Identifyingmodules of coexpressed transcript units and their organization of Saccharopolyspora erythraea from time series gene expression profiles. PLoS One 5, e12126 (2010).
19. Dong, J. & Horvath, S. Understanding network concepts in modules. BMC Syst Biol 1, 24 (2007).
20. Chang, X., Wang, Z., Hao, P., Li, Y. Y. & Li, Y. X. Exploring mitochondrial evolution and metabolism organization principles by comparative analysis of metabolic networks. Genomics 95, 339-344 (2010).
21. Guimera, R. & Amaral, L. A. Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles. J Stat Mech 2005, nihpa35573 (2005).
22. Hao, D. & Li, C. The dichotomy in degree correlation of biological networks. PLoS One 6, e28322 (2011).
23. Komurov, K. & White, M. Revealing static and dynamic modular architecture of the eukaryotic protein interaction network. Mol Syst Biol 3, 110 (2007).
24. Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11, 4241-4257 (2000).
25. Chu, S. et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282, 699-705 (1998). (Pubitemid 28489376)
26. Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 12, 2987-3003 (2001). (Pubitemid 33062956)
27. Cho, S. B., Kim, J. & Kim, J. H. Identifying set-wise differential co-expression in gene expression microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 109 (2009).
28. Keshava Prasad, T. S. et al. Human Protein Reference Database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37, D767-772 (2009).
29. Heym, R. G. & Niessing, D. Principles of mRNA transport in yeast. Cell Mol Life Sci 69, 1843-1853 (2012).
30. Barabasi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5, 101-113 (2004). (Pubitemid 38160277)
31. Freed, E. F., Bleichert, F., Dutca, L. M. & Baserga, S. J. When ribosomes go bad: diseases of ribosome biogenesis. Mol Biosyst 6, 481-493 (2010).
32. Granneman, S. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis: of knobs and RNA processing. Exp Cell Res 296, 43-50 (2004). (Pubitemid 38543211)
33. Henras, A. K. et al. The post-transcriptional steps of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 65, 2334-2359 (2008).
34. Mnaimneh, S. et al. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell 118, 31-44 (2004). (Pubitemid 38902812)
35. Roberts, C. J. et al. Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPKpathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287, 873-880 (2000). (Pubitemid 30084333)
36. Roberts, G. G. & Hudson, A. P. Transcriptome profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during a transition from fermentative to glycerol-based respiratory growth reveals extensive metabolic and structural remodeling. Mol Genet Genomics 276, 170-186 (2006). (Pubitemid 44079956)
37. Spellman, P. T. et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell 9, 3273-3297 (1998). (Pubitemid 28551928)
38. Travers, K. J. et al. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell 101, 249-258 (2000).
39. Yoshimoto, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression regulated by the calcineurin/Crz1p signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277, 31079-31088 (2002). (Pubitemid 34970813)
40. Su, A. I. et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 6062-6067 (2004). (Pubitemid 38520528)
41. Su, A. I. et al. Molecular classification of human carcinomas by use of gene expression signatures. Cancer Res 61, 7388-7393 (2001). (Pubitemid 32995021)
42. Newman, M. E. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69, 026113 (2004).
43. Tatusov, R. L. et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 41 (2003).
44. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4, 44-57 (2009).
45. Hirsh, A. E., Fraser, H. B. & Wall, D. P. Adjusting for selection on synonymous sites in estimates of evolutionary distance. Mol Biol Evol 22, 174-177 (2005). (Pubitemid 39628554)