Extending construal-level theory to distributed groups: Understanding the effects of virtuality

Organization Science

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 629-644

  Wilson, Jeanne ^a   Crisp, C Brad ^b   Mortensen, Mark ^c  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

Construal level; Distance; Distributed groups; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877639359     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0750     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Amin A, Cohendet P (2004) Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).
2. Baba ML, Gluesing J, Ratner H, Wagner KH (2004) The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. J. Organ. Behav. 25:547-587.
3. Bell BS, Kozlowski S (2002) A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organ. Management 27:14-49.
4. Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16:3-18.
5. Brockner J, Swap WC (1976) Effects of repeated exposure on interpersonal attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 33:531-540.
6. Choi H-S, Thompson L (2005) Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 98:121-132.
7. Coshall J, Potter R (1987) Social psychological variations in the distance cognitions of urban consumers in Britain. J. Soc. Psych. 127:611-625.
8. Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12:346-371.
9. Cramton CD, Hinds PJ (2005) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 (Elsevier, New York), 233-265.
10. Cummings JN, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. 20:420-439.
11. Daft RL, Lengel RH (1984) Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 191-233.
12. Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16:332-343.
13. Derryberry D, Reed MA (1998) Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality Individual Differences 25:745-761.
14. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50:25-32.
15. Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 24:135-169.
16. Flowers ML (1977) A laboratory test of some implications of Janis' groupthink hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35:888-896.
17. Förster J, Friedman RS, Liberman N (2004) Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87:177-189.
18. Fujita K, Henderson MD, Eng J, Trope Y, Liberman N (2006) Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psych. Sci. 17:278-282.
19. Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. 36:921-950.
20. Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117:21-38.
21. Gibson CB, Gibbs JL, Stanko TL, Tesluk P, Cohen SG (2011) Including the "I" in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experience of electronic dependence and copresence. Organ. Sci. 22:1481-1499.
22. Griffith TL, Sawyer JE, Neale MA (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals and information technology. MIS Quart. 27:265-285.
23. Harrison D, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. 41:96-107.
24. Hedstrom P, Swedberg R (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
25. Henderson MD (2009) Psychological distance and group judgments: The effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull 35:1330-1341.
26. Henderson MD, Fujita K, Trope Y, Liberman N (2006) Transcending the "here": The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91:845-856.
27. Hertel G, Konradt U, Orlikowski B (2004) Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence and teambased rewards in virtual teams. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 13:1-28.
28. Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed groups. Organ. Sci. 14:615-632.
29. Hinds PJ, Cramton CD (2008) Situated Knowing Who: Why Site Visits Matter in Global Work (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).
30. Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16:290-307.
31. Idson LC, Miscel W (2001) The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80:585-596.
32. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:517-543.
33. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10:791-815.
34. Jia L, Hirt ER, Karpen SC (2009) Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45:1127-1131.
35. Jones EE, Nisbett RE (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Jones EE, Kanouse DE,
36. Kivetz Y, Tyler TR (2007) Tomorrow I'll be me: The effects of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102:193-211.
37. Lea MT, Spears R (1992) Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J. Organ. Comput. 2:321-341.
38. Levy SR, Freitas A, Salovey P (2002) Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among but also empathizing with and helping others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83:1224-1238.
39. Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75:5-18.
40. Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322:1201-1205.
41. Liberman N, Sagristano MD, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38:523-534.
42. Lindsley DH, Brass DJ, Thomas JB (1995) Efficacy performance spirals: AQ multi-level perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 20:645-678.
43. Liviatan I, Trope Y, Liberman N (2008) Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perceptions of others' actions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44:1256-1269.
44. Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Richard J (2005) Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. 16:9-27.
45. Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported interorganizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24:569-600.
46. McKnight DH, Cummings L, Chervany N (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23:473-490.
47. Mortensen M, Neeley T (2012) Reflected knowledge and trust in global collaboration. Management Sci. 58(12):2207-2224.
48. Mullen B, Copper C (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psych. Bull. 115:210-227.
49. Nussbaum S, Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84:485-497.
50. O'Leary MB (2010) Virtual by choice: An interaction control theory of deliberate distancing via mediated communication. Presentation at the Academy of Management Conference, August 6-10, Montreal.
51. O'Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. 31:433-452.
52. O'Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21:115-131.
53. O'Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley A (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36:461-478.
54. Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Human Comput. Interaction 15:139-178.
55. Ostrom TM, Sedikides C (1992) Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psych. Bull. 112:536-552.
56. Pinto MB, Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1993) Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. 39:1281-1297.
57. Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. 49:679-692.
58. Raghuram S, Tuertscher P, Garud R (2010) Mapping the field of virtual work: A cocitation analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 21:1-17.
59. Randel AE, Jaussi KS (2003) Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. 46:763-774.
60. Rutkowski A-F, Saunders C, Vogel D, van Genuchten M (2007) "Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?" Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small Group Res. 38:98-129.
61. Schiller SZ, Mandviwalla M (2007) Virtual team research: Analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Res. 38:12-59.
62. Smith PK, Trope Y (2006) You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:578-596.
63. Sproull L, Kiesler S (1986) Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32:1492-1512.
64. Staples DS, Hulland JS, Higgins CA (1999) A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. 10:758-776.
65. Staw B (1975) Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13:414-432.
66. Thomas D, Bostrom R (2008) Building trust and cooperation through technology adaptation in virtual teams: Empirical field evidence. Inform. Systems Management 25:45-56.
67. Trope Y, Liberman N (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79:876-889.
68. Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110:403-421.
69. Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117:440-463.
70. Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 17:83-95.
71. Wakslak CJ, Nussbaum S, Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) Representations of the self in the near and distant future. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95:757-773.
72. Wakslak CJ, Trope Y, Liberman N, Alony R (2006) Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 135:641-653.
73. Walther JB (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comm. Res. 19:52-90.
74. Walther JB, Bazarova NN (2008) Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Comm. Res. 35:622-645.
75. Walther JB, Anderson JF, Park DW (1994) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Comm. Res. 21:460-487.
76. Walther JB, Slovacek CL, Tidwell LC (2001) Is a picture worth a thousand words? Comm. Res. 28:105-134.
77. Webster J, Staples DS (2006) Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. Martocchio JJ, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 181-215.
78. Weisband S, ed. (2008) Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).
79. Weisband S, Atwater L (1999) Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. J. Appl. Psych. 84:632-639.
80. Weisband S, Thatcher SMB, Xu J (2005) Using bibliometric analysis to evaluate scientific progress in virtual teams research. Presentation at the Academy of Management Conference, August 5-10, Honolulu, HI.
81. Whetten DA, Felin T, King BG (2009) The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. J. Management 35:537-563.
82. Wilson J (2001) The development of trust in distributed groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
83. Wilson JM, Straus SG, McEvily WJ (2006) All in due time: The development of trust in electronic and face-to-face groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99:16-33.
84. Wilson JM, O'Leary M, Metiu A, Jett Q (2008) Perceptions of proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ. Stud. 29:979-1002.
85. Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18:749-762.