Simultaneous perfusion and permeability measurements using combined spin-and gradient-echo MRI

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 732-743

  Schmiedeskamp, Heiko ^a   Andre, Jalal B ^b   Straka, Matus ^a   Christen, Thomas ^a   Nagpal, Seema ^c   Recht, Lawrence ^c   Thomas, Reena P ^c   Zaharchuk, Greg ^a   Bammer, Roland ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

blood brain barrier; brain imaging; MRI; perfusion weighted MRI; pharmacokinetics

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PERMEABILITY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST MEDIUM EXTRAVASATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TUMOR GROWTH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84877581727     PISSN: 0271678X     EISSN: 15597016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.10     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Weisskoff RM, Boxerman JL, Sorensen AG, Kulke SF, Campbell TA, Rosen BR. Simultaneous blood volume and permeability mapping using a single Gd-based contrast injection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of SMRM, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1994, p 279.
2. Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM. Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 859-867.
3. Quarles CC, Ward BD, Schmainda KM. Improving the reliability of obtaining tumor hemodynamic parameters in the presence of contrast agent extravasation. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1307-1316.
4. Miyati T, Banno T, Mase M, Kasai H, Shundo H, Imazawa M et al. Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 230-235.
5. Vonken EJ, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 109-117.
6. Uematsu H, Maeda M, Sadato N, Matsuda T, Ishimori Y, Koshimoto Y et al. Vascular permeability: quantitative measurement with double-echo dynamic MR imaging-theory and clinical application. Radiology 2000; 214: 912-917.
7. Vonken EP, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd-DTPA extravasation measurement with dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 820-827.
8. Paulson ES, Schmainda KM. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology 2008; 249: 601-613.
9. Quarles CC, Gochberg DF, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE. A theoretical framework to model DSC-MRI data acquired in the presence of contrast agent extravasation. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 5749-5766.
10. Stewart GN. Researches on the circulation time and on the influences which affect it. J Physiol 1897; 22: 159-183.
11. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954; 6: 731-744.
12. Calamante F, Vonken EJ, van Osch MJ. Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 544-553.
13. Straka M, Schmiedeskamp H, Zaharchuk G, Andre JB, Olivot J-M, Fischbein NJ et al. Consequences of multi-echo fits in perfusion MRI for the determination of MTT in presence of T1-effects. In: Proceeedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Montreal: Canada, 2011, p 462.
14. Bjørnerud A, Sorensen AG, Mouridsen K, Emblem KE. T1-and T2*-dominant extravasation correction in DSC-MRI: part I-theoretical considerations and implications for assessment of tumor hemodynamic properties. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31: 2041-2053.
15. Liu HL, Wu YY, Yang WS, Chen CF, Lim KE, Hsu YY. Is Weisskoff model valid for the correction of contrast agent extravasation with combined T1 and T2* effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI Med Phys 2011; 38: 802-809.
16. Quarles CC, Gore JC, Xu L, Yankeelov TE. Comparison of dual-echo DSC-MRI-and DCE-MRI-derived contrast agent kinetic parameters. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 944-953.
17. St Lawrence KS, Lee TY. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain: I. Theoretical derivation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 1365-1377.
18. Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin PC et al. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 519-529.
19. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 601-610.
20. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 555-566.
21. Donahue KM, Krouwer HG, Rand SD, Pathak AP, Marszalkowski CS, Censky SC et al. Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 845-853.
22. Speck O, Chang L, DeSilva NM, Ernst T. Perfusion MRI of the human brain with dynamic susceptibility contrast: gradient-echo versus spin-echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 381-387.
23. Schmiedeskamp H, Straka M, Newbould RD, Zaharchuk G, Andre JB, Olivot JM et al. Combined spin-and gradient-echo perfusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 30-40.
24. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
25. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 715-725.
26. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193: 637-641.
27. Straka M, Albers GW, Bammer R. Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 1024-1037.
28. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Viergever MA, van der Grond J, Bakker CJ. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 1067-1076.
29. Kjolby BF, Ostergaard L, Kiselev VG. Theoretical model of intravascular paramagnetic tracers effect on tissue relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 187-197.
30. Sykova E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 1277-1340.
31. Donaldson SB, West CM, Davidson SE, Carrington BM, Hutchison G, Jones AP et al. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrastenhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 691-700.
32. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 213-221.
33. Donahue KM, Burstein D, Manning WJ, Gray ML. Studies of Gd-DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 66-76.
34. Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 205-217.
35. Thompson Jr. HK, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD. Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate. Circ Res 1964; 14: 502-515.
36. Bahn MM. A single-step method for estimation of local cerebral blood volume from susceptibility contrast MRI images. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 309-317.
37. Boxerman JL, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. Signal-to-noise analysis of cerebral blood volume maps from dynamic NMR imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 528-537.
38. Benner T, Heiland S, Erb G, Forsting M, Sartor K. Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 307-317.
39. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983; 3: 1-7.
40. Newbould RD, Skare ST, Jochimsen TH, Alley MT, Moseley ME, Albers GW et al. Perfusion mapping with multiecho multishot parallel imaging EPI. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 70-81.
41. Tropres I, Grimault S, Vaeth A, Grillon E, Julien C, Payen JF et al. Vessel size imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 397-408.
42. Kiselev VG, Strecker R, Ziyeh S, Speck O, Hennig J. Vessel size imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 553-563.
43. Schmainda KM, Rand SD, Joseph AM, Lund R, Ward BD, Pathak AP et al. Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1524-1532.
44. Schmiedeskamp H, Straka M, Bammer R. Compensation of slice profile mismatch in combined spin-and gradient-echo echo-planar imaging pulse sequences. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 378-388.
45. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting. J Am Statist Assoc 1988; 83: 596-610.