A theoretical framework to model DSC-MRI data acquired in the presence of contrast agent extravasation

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 5749-5766

  Quarles, C C ^a,b,c   Gochberg, D F ^a   Gore, J C ^a,b,c   Yankeelov, T E ^a,b,c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN TUMORS; CALIBRATION FACTORS; CONTRAST AGENT; DATA ANALYSIS METHODS; DSC MRI; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; ECHO TIME; FLIP ANGLE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; INTRAVASCULAR; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; PULSE SEQUENCE; RELAXATION EFFECT; RELAXATION RATES; SIGNAL INTENSITIES; SIGNAL TIME; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; THEORETICAL MODELS; TIME COURSE; VASCULATURE;

BLOOD; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; SIGNAL SYSTEMS;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN TUMOR; CALIBRATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; EXTRAVASATION; EXTRAVASCULAR SPACE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; IMAGE DISPLAY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; EXTRAVASATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC MATERIALS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 70350639597     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aronen H J, Cohen M S, Belliveau J W, Fordham J A and Rosen B R 1993 Ultrafast imaging of brain tumors Top. Magn. Reson. Imag. 5 14-24
2. Aronen H J, Gazit I E, Louis D N, Buchbinder B R, Pardo F S, Weisskoff R M, Harsh G R, Cosgrove G R, Halpern E F and Hochberg F H 1994 Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings Radiology 191 41-51
3. Bruening R, Kwong K K, Vevea M J, Hochberg F H, Cher L, Harsh G R t, Niemi P T, Weisskoff R M and Rosen B R 1996 Echo-planar MR determination of relative cerebral blood volume in human brain tumors: T1 versus T2 weighting Am. J. Neuroradiol. 17 831-40 (Pubitemid 126499953)
4. Conturo T E, Akbudak E, Kotys M S, Chen M L, Chun S J, Hsu R M, Sweeney C C and Markham J 2005 Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 697-703
5. Donahue K M, Krouwer H G, Rand S D, Pathak A P, Marszalkowski C S, Censky S C and Prost R W 2000 Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients Magn. Reson. Med. 43 845-53
6. Donahue K M, Weisskoff R M and Burstein D 1997 Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 7 102-10
7. Evelhoch J L 1999 Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 10 254-9
8. Fuss M, Wenz F, Essig M, Muenter M, Debus J, Herman T S and Wannenmacher M 2001 Tumor angiogenesis of low-grade astrocytomas measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI (DSC-MRI) is predictive of local tumor control after radiation therapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 51 478-82
9. Gore J C and Majumdar S 1990 Measurement of tissue blood flow using intravascular relaxation agents and magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 14 242-8
10. Gossmann A, Helbich T H, Kuriyama N, Ostrowitzki S, Roberts T P, Shames D M, van Bruggen N, Wendland M F, Israel M A and Brasch R C 2002 Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 15 233-40
11. Hakyemez B, Erdogan C, Ercan I, Ergin N, Uysal S and Atahan S 2005 High-grade and low-grade gliomas: differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging Clin. Radiol. 60 493-502
12. Heiland S, Benner T, Debus J, Rempp K, Reith W and Sartor K 1999 Simultaneous assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and contrast agent uptake in lesions with disrupted blood-brain-barrier Magn. Reson. Imag. 17 21-7
13. Johnson G, Wetzel S G, Cha S, Babb J and Tofts P S 2004 Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T(2)*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 51 961-8
14. Kennan R P, Zhong J and Gore J C 1994 Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues Magn. Reson. Med. 31 9-21
15. Kiselev V G 2001 On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 46 1113-22
16. Kiselev V G 2005 Transverse relaxation effect of MRI contrast agents: a crucial issue for quantitative measurements of cerebral perfusion J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 693-6
17. Landis C S, Li X, Telang F W, Coderre J A, Micca P L, Rooney W D, Latour L L, Vetek G, Palyka I and Springer C S Jr 2000 Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange Magn. Reson. Med. 44 563-74
18. Law M, Meltzer D E, Wetzel S G, Yang S, Knopp E A, Golfinos J and Johnson G 2004 Conventional MR imaging with simultaneous measurements of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability in ganglioglioma Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 599-606 (Pubitemid 38692618)
19. Lee M C, Cha S, Chang S M and Nelson S J 2005 Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of radiation effects in normal-appearing brain tissue: changes in the first-pass and recirculation phases J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 21 683-93
20. Ostergaard L 2005 Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 710-7 (Pubitemid 41741235)
21. Pathak A P, Rand S D and Schmainda K M 2003 The effect of brain tumor angiogenesis on the in vivo relationship between the gradient-echo relaxation rate change (DeltaR2*) and contrast agent (MION) dose J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 18 397-403
22. Pathak A P, Ward B D and Schmainda K M 2008 A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method Neuroimage 40 1130-43
23. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann K P, Claussen C D and Schick F 2006 Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (magnevist), gadobutrol (gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (multihance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla Invest. Radiol. 41 213-21
24. Quarles C C, Ward B D and Schmainda K M 2005 Improving the reliability of obtaining tumor hemodynamic parameters in the presence of contrast agent extravasation Magn. Reson. Med. 53 1307-16
25. Rosen B R, Belliveau J W, Vevea J M and Brady T J 1990 Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents Magn. Reson. Med. 14 249-65
26. Schmainda K M, Rand S D, Joseph A M, Lund R, Ward B D, Pathak A P, Ulmer J L, Badruddoja M A and Krouwer H G 2004 Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis Am. J. Neuroradiol. 25 1524-32
27. Simpson N E, He Z and Evelhoch J L 1999 Deuterium NMR tissue perfusion measurements using the tracer uptake approach: I. Optimization of methods Magn. Reson. Med. 42 42-52
28. Tofts P and Kermode A 1991 Measurement of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors Magn. Reson. Med. 17 357-67
29. Tofts P S et al 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 10 223-32
30. Uematsu H et al 2001 Blood volume of gliomas determined by double-echo dynamic perfusion-weighted MR imaging: a preliminary study Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22 1915-9
31. Uematsu H et al 2000 Vascular permeability: quantitative measurement with double-echo dynamic MR imaging-theory and clinical application Radiology 214 912-7
32. Vonken E J, van Osch M J, Bakker C J and Viergever M A 1999 Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 10 109-17
33. Vonken E P, van Osch M J, Bakker C J and Viergever M A 2000 Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd-DTPA extravasation measurement with dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 43 820-7
34. Weber M A et al 2004 Assessment of irradiated brain metastases by means of arterial spin-labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: initial results Invest. Radiol. 39 277-87
35. Weisskoff R M, Boxerman J L, Sorensen A G, Kulke S T C and Rosen B R 1994 Simultaneous blood volume and permeability mapping using a single Gd-based contrast injection Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. (San Francisco, CA) p 279
36. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Koroshetz W J, Schwamm L H, O'Donnell J, Schaefer P W, Rosen B R, Weisskoff R M and Sorensen A G 2003 Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 50 856-64
37. Yankeelov T E and Gore J C 2007 Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology Curr. Med. Imag. Rev. 3 91-107
38. Yankeelov T E et al 2007 Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results Magn. Reson. Imag. 25 1-13