Perfusion mapping with multiecho multishot parallel imaging EPI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 70-81

  Newbould, Rexford D ^a   Skare, Stefan T ^a   Jochimsen, Thies H ^c   Alley, Marcus T ^a   Moseley, Michael E ^a   Albers, Gregory W ^b   Bammer, Roland ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bolus tracking; Dynamic susceptibility contrast; Parallel imaging; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAPPING;

DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; GEOMETRIC DISTORTION; PARALLEL IMAGING; PERFUSION; PERFUSION MEASUREMENTS; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; TRACER CONCENTRATION;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

TRACER;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN PERFUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STROKE;

EID: 34547787290     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21255     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rose SE, Janke AL, Griffin M, Strudwick M, Finnigan S, Semple J, Chalk JB. Improving the prediction of final infarct size in acute stroke with bolus delay-corrected perfusion MRI measures. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:941-947.
2. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Buchbinder BR, McKinstry RC, Porkka LM, Kennedy DN, Neuder MS, Fisel CR, Aronen HJ, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Cohen MS. Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:285-292.
3. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;93:637-641.
4. Guckel F, Brix G, Rempp K, Deimling M, Rother J, Georgi M. Assessment of cerebral blood volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced gradient-echo imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:344-351.
5. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
6. Mansfield, P. Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State 1977;10:L55-L58.
7. Constable RT, Gore JC. The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:9-24.
8. Farzaneh F, Riederer SJ, Pelc NJ. Analysis of T2 limitations and off-resonance effects on spatial resolution and artifacts in echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;14:123-139
9. Ellinger R, Kremser C, Schocke MF, Michael FH, Kolbitsch C, Griebel J, Felber SR, Aichner FT. The impact of peak saturation of the arterial input function on quantitative evaluation of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:942-948.
10. Bammer R, Keeling SL, Augustin A, Pruessmann KP, Wolf R, Stollberger R, Hartung V, Fazekas F. Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001;46:548-554.
11. Stollberger R, Fazekas F. Improved perfusion and tracer kinetic imaging using parallel imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:245-255.
12. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Chen Q, Goldfarb JW, Manning WJ, Edelman RR, Sodickson DK. Resolution enhancement in single-shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH). Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1236-1245.
13. Vonken EP, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd-DTPA extravasation measurement with dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:820-827.
14. Vonken EJ, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:109-117.
15. Newbould R, Skare S, Clayton DB, Alley MT, Albers G, Lansberg M, Bammer R. PERMEATE: High temporal resolution multi-echo/multi-slice dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging using GRAPPA EPI. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM Seattle, WA, USA, 2006 (Abstract 673).
16. Skare S, Bammer R. Spatial modeling of GRAPPA weights. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 2005 (Abstract 2422).
17. Skare S, Newbould RD, Clayton DB, Bammer R. Propeller EPI in the other direction. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1298-1307.
18. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline J-B, Heather JD, Frackowiak. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;3:165-189.
19. Mlynash M, Eyngorn I, Bammer R, Moseley M, Tong DC. Automated method for generating the arterial input function on perfusion-weighted MR imaging: validation in patients with stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1479-1486.
20. van Osch M, Vonken E, Viergever M, van der Grond J, Bakker C. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1067-1076.
21. Kjølby BF, Østergaard L, Kiselev VG. Theoretical model of intravascular paramagnetic tracers' effect on tissue relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:187-197.
22. Wu O, Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
23. Meier P, Zierler LL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-744.
24. Zierler KL. Theoretical basis of indicator-dilution methods for measuring flow and volume. Circ Res 1962;10:393-407.
25. Sijbers J, den Dekker AJ, Audekerke JV, Verhoye M, Dyck DV. Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:87-90.
26. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
27. Simonsen CZ, Østergaard L, Smith DF, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Gyldensted C. Comparison of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:411-416.
28. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BP. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:601-610.
29. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:555-566.
30. Jochimsen TH, Newbould RD, Skare ST, Clayton DB, Albers GW, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Identifying systematic errors in quantitative dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging by high resolution multiecho parallel EPI. NMR Biomed (in press).
31. Wiesinger F, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, Zanche ND, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP. Potential and feasibility of parallel MRI at high field. NMR Biomed 2006;19:368-378.
32. Kiselev VG. On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1113-1122.