Determinants of citizens' intent to use government websites in Taiwan

Information Development

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 123-137

  Wang, Hui Ju ^a   Lo, Jin ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

e government; government websites; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB); trustworthiness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877319246     PISSN: 02666669     EISSN: 17416469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0266666912453835     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Leadership in customer services: new expectations, new experiences. 2005:.
2. Adkins M,Burgoon M,Nunamaker JF.Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force.Decision Support Systems. 2002;34:315-337.
3. Ajzen I.The theory of planned behaviour.Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179-211.
4. Bagozzi RP,Hestherton TF.A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to state self-esteem.Structural Equation Modeling. 1994;1 (1): 35-67.
5. Bannister F.The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2007;73 (2): 171-188.
6. Belanger F,Hiller JS,Smith WJ.Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes.Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002;11:245-270.
7. Bhattacherjee A.Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Transactions on Systems.Man, and Cybernetics: Part A. Systems and Humans. 2000;30 (4): 411-420.
8. Improving technology utilization in electronic government around the world, 2008. 2008:.
9. Burnkrant RE,Cousineau A.Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior.Journal of Consumer Research. 1975;2 (3): 206-215.
10. Caplan SE.Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being.Communication Research. 2003;30 (6): 625-648.
11. Carter L,Belanger F.The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors.Information Systems Journal. 2005;15 (1): 5-25.
12. Chang I-C,Li Y-C,Hung W-F, et al.An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers' acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems.Government Information Quarterly. 2005;22 (3): 389-410.
13. Chen Y-C.Managing e-government outsourcing projects: lessons from U.S. local government.Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems. 2002;:558-563.
14. Chen Y-C,Gant J.Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers.Government Information Quarterly. 2001;18 (4): 343-355.
15. Chu P-Y,Hsiao N,Lee F-W, et al.Exploring success factors for Taiwan's government electronic tendering system: behavioral perspectives from end users.Government Information Quarterly. 2004;21 (2): 219-234.
16. Davis FD.Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly. 1989;13 (3): 318-340.
17. Davis FD,Bagozzi RP,Warshaw PR.User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science. 1989;35 (8): 982-1003.
18. Devadoss PR,Pan SL,Huang JC.Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: a case study of SCO.Decision Support Systems. 2003;34 (3): 253-269.
19. Evans D,Yen DC.E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for understanding cultural and social impact.Government Information Quarterly. 2005;22 (3): 354-373.
20. Fishbein M,Ajzen I.Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research Reading,. MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975:.
21. Fornell C,Larcker DF.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18 (1): 39-50.
22. Gefen D,Karahanna E,Straub DW.Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model.MIS Quarterly. 2003;27 (1): 51-90.
23. Goodhue DL,Thompson RL.Task-technology fit and individual performance.MIS Quarterly. 1995;19 (2): 213-236.
24. Gopi M,Ramayah T.Applicability of theory of planned behavior in predicting intention to trade online: some evidence from a developing country.International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2007;2 (4): 348-360.
25. Hair JF,Black B,Babin B, et alMultivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2010:.
26. Hartwick J,Barki H.Explaining the role of user participation in information system use.Management Science. 1994;40 (4): 440-465.
27. Horst M,Kuttschreuter M,Gutteling JM.Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of egovernment services in The Netherlands.Computers in Human Behavior. 2007;23 (4): 1838-1852.
28. Hu G,Pan W,Wang J.The distinctive lexicon and consensual conception of e-government: an exploratory perspective.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2010;76 (3): 577-597.
29. Hu H,Li Q,Lin Z.From concept towards implementation: e-government in China.Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). 2003;:1104-1108.
30. Hung S-Y,Chang C-M,Yu T-J.Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: the case of online tax filing and payment system.Government Information Quarterly. 2006;23 (1): 97-122.
31. Hung S-Y,Ku C-Y,Chang C-M.Electronic government strategies and implementation. Huang WSiau KWei KK, ed. Idea Group Publishing; 2005:421-440.
32. Hung S-Y,Tang K-Z,Chang C-M, et al.User acceptance of intergovernmental services: an example of electronic document management system.Government Information Quarterly. 2009;26 (2): 387-397.
33. Jöreskog K,Sörbom D.LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: Scientific Software International / Erlbaum; 1993:.
34. Jaeger PT.Constitutional principles and e-government: an opinion about possible effects of federalism and the separation of powers on e-government policies.Government Information Quarterly. 2002;19 (4):.
35. Kunstelj M,Jukic T,Vintar M.How to fully exploit the results of e-government user surveys: the case of Slovenia.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2009;75 (1): 117-149.
36. Lean OK,Zailani S,Ramayah T, et al.Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia.International Journal of Information Management. 2009;29 (6): 458-475.
37. Lee JK,Braynov S,Rao HR.Effects of a public emergency on citizens usage intention toward e-government: a study in the context of war in Iraq.Proceedings of the eleventh Americas conference on information system Omaha. 2005;:.
38. Lowry PB,Albrecht CC,JFN Jr., et al.Evolutionary development and research on Internet-based collaborative writing tools and processes to enhance ewriting in an egovernment setting.Decision Support Systems. 2003;34 (3): 229-252.
39. McClureD. (2001) Electronic government: challenges must be addressed with effective leadership and management. GAO-01-959T. Testimony before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, on behalf of the U.S. General Accounting Office, July 11, 2001. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01959t.pdf.
40. McKnight DH,Choudhury V,Kacmar C.Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology.Information Systems Research. 2002;13 (3): 334-359.
41. Melitski J.Capacity and e-government performance: an analysis based on early adopters of Internet technologies in New Jersey.Public Performance & Management Review. 2003;26 (4): 376-390.
42. Moon MJ.The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?.Public Administration Review. 2002;62 (4): 424-433.
43. Morgeson III FV,Mithas S.Does e-government measure up to e-business? Comparing end user perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and e-business web sites.Public Administration Review. 2009;69 (4): 740-752.
44. Nagi EA,Hamdan M.Computerization and e-government implementation in Jordan: challenges, obstacles and successes.Government Information Quarterly. 2009;26 (4): 577-583.
45. Parasuraman A,Zeithaml VA,Berry LL.SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing. 1988;64 (1):.
46. Parent M,Vandebeek CA,Gemino AC.Building citizen trust through egovernment.Government Information Quarterly. 2005;22 (4): 720-736.
47. PascualPJ. (2003) E-Government. E-Asian Task Force and the UNDP Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP). Available at: http://www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/eprimer-egov.pdf.
48. Pavlou PA.Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model.International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2003;7 (3): 69-103.
49. Pavlou PA,Fygenson M.Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior.MIS Quarterly. 2006;30 (1): 115-143.
50. Piotrowski SJ,Ryzin GGV.Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government.The American Review of Public Administration. 2007;37 (3): 306-323.
51. Reddick CG.A two-state model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for US cities.Government Information Quarterly. 2004;21 (1): 51-64.
52. Rocheleau B.Prescriptions for public-sector information management: a review, analysis, and critique.The American Review of Public Administration. 2000;30 (4): 414-435.
53. Rose WR,Grant GG.Critical issues pertaining to the planning and implementation of e-government initiatives.Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27 (1): 26-33.
54. Shankar V,Smith AK,Rangaswamy A.Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments.International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2003;20 (2): 153-175.
55. Siau K,Long Y.Synthesizing e-government stage models-a meta synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach.Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2005;105 (4): 443-458.
56. Silver MS.Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support.MIS Quarterly. 1991;15 (1): 105-122.
57. Stratford JS,Stratford J.Computerized and networked government information.Journal of Government Information. 1995;22 (5): 421-424.
58. Strejcek G,Theil M.Technology push, legislation pull? E-government in the European Union.Decision Support Systems. 2003;34 (3): 305-313.
59. Taylor S,Todd PA.Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience.MIS Quarterly. 1995a;19 (4): 561-570.
60. Taylor S,Todd PA.Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models.Information Systems Research. 1995b;6 (2): 144-176.
61. Tung LL,Rieck O.Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore.Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2005;14 (4): 417-440.
62. United Nations (2008) UN E-Government Survey 2008: from e-government to connected governance. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan028607.pdf.
63. United Nations (2010) E-Government Survey 2010: leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan038851.pdf.
64. Vassilakis C,Laskaridis G,Lepouras G, et al.A framework for managing the lifecycle of transactional e-government services.Telematics and Informatics. 2003;20 (4): 315-329.
65. Venkatesh V,Davis FD.A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies.Management Science. 2000;46 (2): 186-204.
66. Weber RO,Aha DW.Intelligent delivery of military lessons learned.Decision Support Systems. 2003;34 (3): 287-304.
67. Welch EW,Hinnant CC,Moon MJ.Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005;15 (3): 371-391.
68. Wimmer M,Traunmüller R.Proceedings of the11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. London, UK: Greenwich; 2000:340-345.
69. Wimmer MA,Traunmüller R,Lenk K.Electronic business invading the public sector: considerations on change and design.Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2001;:1709-1718.
70. World Economic Forum (2011) The Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2011.pdf.
71. Wu G.Conceptualizing and measuring the perceived interactivity of websites.Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising. 2006;28 (1): 87-104.