Acceptance of e-commerce services: The case of electronic brokerages

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans.

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 411-420

  Bhattacherjee, Anol ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

ELECTRONIC BROKERAGES; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR (TPB);

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 0034228818     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/3468.852435     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, "The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies," Decision Sci., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 557-582, Summer 1997.
2. I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211, Dec. 1991.
3. P. M. Bentler, EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software, 1989.
4. P. M. Bentler and D. G. Bonett, Psych. Bull., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 588-606, Nov. 1980.
5. J. C. Brancheau and J. C. Wetherbe, "The adoption of spreadsheet technology: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 115-143, June 1990.
6. Business Wire. (1999, Feb. 11) Online investing market grows by 73% in 1998; Online investors expect impact to be felt by full service and discount firms. [Online]Availablehttp://www.businesswire.comDirectory: webbox/bw.021 199 File: 1 100 662.htm
7. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models," Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, Aug. 1989.
8. _, "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace," J. Appl. Soc. Psych., vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1111-1132, July 1992.
9. C. Fornell and F. L. Bookstein, "A comparative analysis of two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to market data," in A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, C. Fornell, Ed. New York: Praeger, 1982.
10. P. M. Herr, F. R. Kardes, and J. Kim, "Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective," J. Consum. Res., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 454-462, Mar. 1991.
11. S. L. Holak, "Determinants of innovative durables adoption: An empirical study with implications for early product screening," J. Prod. Innov. Manage., pp. 50-69, Mar. 1988.
12. Inteco, "Why do people choose ISP's and why do they drop them," in Inteco Corp. Press Rep. Stamford, CT, Sept. 1998.
13. E. Karahanna, D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany, "Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs," MIS Quart., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 183-213, June 1999.
14. K. Mathieson, "Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 173-191, Sept. 1991.
15. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
16. L. Porter and E. E. Lawler, Managerial Attitudes and Performance. New York: Free Press, 1968.
17. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
18. Silicon Investor. (1999) Silicon investor user profile. [On-line] http://www.go2net.com/corporate/advertising/siliconinvestor/demo.html
19. S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, "Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 144-176, June 1995.
20. R. T. Watson, P. Berthon, L. F. Pitt, and G. M. Zinkhan, Electronic Commerce: The Strategic Perspective. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden, 2000.
21. W. Xia and W. R. King, "Interdependencies between the determinants of user interaction and usage: An empirical test," in Proc. ICIS Cleveland, OH, 1996, pp. 1-21.