Keeping abreast of technology-driven business model evolution: A dynamic patent analysis approach

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 487-505

  Lee, Changyong ^a,b   Park, Hyojin ^c   Park, Yongtae ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

business method patents; dynamic patent analysis; formal concept analysis (FCA); morphological analysis (MA); technology driven business model evolution; text mining

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS; MODELING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84877263555     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.785513     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allison, J. R. and Tiller, E. H. 2003. " Internet business model patents ". In Patents in the knowledge-based economy, Edited by: Cohen, W. M. and Merrill, S. A. 259-84. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
2. Bader, M. A. 2008. Managing intellectual property in the financial service industry sector: Learning from Swiss Re. Technovation, 28: 196-207.
3. Belaziz, M., Bouras, A. and Brun, J. M. 2000. Morphological analysis for product design. Computer-Aided Design, 32: 377-88.
4. Birkhoff, G. 1973. Lattice theory, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society Colloquium.
5. Carnabuci, G. 2011. The evolving structure of the technological landscape. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 145-58.
6. Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ricart, J. E. 2010. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43: 195-215.
7. Chen, S., M. Huang, and D. Chen. 2012. Identifying and visualizing technology evolution: A case study of smart grid technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.
8. Chesbrough, H. 2010. Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43: 354-63.
9. Demil, B. and Lecocq, X. 2010. Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43: 227-46.
10. Drew, S. 2003. Strategic use of E-commerce by SMEs in the East of England. European Management Journal, 21: 79-88.
11. Dunford, R., Palmer, I. and Benveniste, J. 2010. Business model replication for early and rapid internationalisation: The ING direct experience. Long Range Planning, 43: 655-74.
12. EIRMA. 2007. Challenging R&D in changing business models. European Industrial Research Management Association. http://www.eirma.org.
13. Engelsman, E. G. and van Raan, A.F.J. 1993. International comparison of technological activities and specialization: A patent-based monitoring system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5: 113-36.
14. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47: 117-32.
15. Ganter, B. and Wille, R. 1999. Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations, Berlin: Springer.
16. Gerken, J. M. and Moehrle, M. G. 2012. A new instrument for technology monitoring: Novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis. Scientometrics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0635-7.
17. Grandon, E. E. and Pearson, J. M. 2004. Electronic commerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Information and Management, 42: 197-216.
18. Hall, B., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper 8498.
19. Huckvale, M. and Fang, A. C. 2002. Using phonologically-constrained morphological analysis in continuous speech recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 16: 165-81.
20. Jeon, J., Lee, C. and Park, Y. 2011. How to use patent information to search potential technology partners in open innovation. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16: 385-93.
21. Kazuyuki, M. 2009. Software patent and its impact on software innovation in Japan. Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry. http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/.
22. Kim, C., Choe, S., Choi, C. and Park, Y. 2008. A systematic approach to new mobile service creation. Expert Systems with Applications, 35: 762-71.
23. Kraemer, K. L., Dedrick, J. and Yamashiro, S. 1999. Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell computer corporation. Information Science, 16: 5-21.
24. Lee, C., Cho, Y., Seol, H. and Park, Y. 2012. A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79: 16-29.
25. Lee, C., Jeon, J. and Park, Y. 2011. Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: A modified formal concept analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78: 690-702.
26. Lee, C., Song, B. and Park, Y. 2009. Generation of new service concepts: A morphology analysis and genetic algorithm approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 12454-60.
27. Lee, S., Yoon, B. and Park, Y. 2009. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 29: 481-97.
28. Lichtenthaler, E. 2004. Coordination of technology intelligence process: A case study in technology intensive multinationals. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16: 197-221.
29. McGrath, R. G. 2010. Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43: 247-61.
30. Mogee, M. E. and Kolar, R. G. 1994. International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6: 485-503.
31. Nosella, A., Petroni, G. and Verbano, C. 2005. Characteristics of the Italian biotechnology industry and new business models: The initial results of an empirical study. Technovation, 25: 841-55.
32. Ovans, A. 2000. Can you patent your business models?. Harvard Business Review, 78 16
33. Pateli, A. G. and Giaglis, G. M. 2004. A research framework for analysing eBusiness models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13: 302-14.
34. Pateli, A. G. and Giaglis, G. M. 2005. Technology innovation-induced business model change: A contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18: 167-83.
35. Pelt, J. V. and Schierwagen, A. 2004. Morphological analysis and modeling of neuronal dendrites. Mathematical Biosciences, 188: 147-55.
36. Ritchey, T. 1998. General morphological analysis: A general method for non-quantified modeling. Swedish Morphological Society. http://www.swemorph.com.
37. Song, B., D. Kang, B. Yoon, and Y. Park. 2010. Development of two-layered service evolution map: Structure and development process. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, December 7-11, in Macau.
38. Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N. and Velamuri, S. R. 2010. Busines model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43: 383-407.
39. Sternitzke, C. and Bergmann, I. 2009. Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist. Scientometrics, 78: 113-30.
40. Susan, C., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K., Lee, H. J., Ordóòez, G. and Porter, A. 2010. Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 361-76.
41. Teece, D. J. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43: 172-94.
42. USPTO. 2000. Automated financial or management data processing methods (business methods), Washington, DC: USPTO.
43. USPTO. 2003. A USPTO white paper: Automated financial or management data processing methods (business methods), Washington, DC: USPTO. http://www.uspto.gov.
44. Voelpel, S., Leibold, M. and Tekie, E. B. 2004. The wheel of business model reinvention: How to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors. Journal of Change Management, 4: 259-76.
45. Wille, R. 1982. " Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts ". In Ordered sets, Edited by: Rival, I. 445-70. Dordrecht: Reide.
46. Willemstein, L., van der Valk, T. and Meeus, M. T.H. 2007. Dynamics in business models: An empirical analysis of medical biotechnology firms in the Netherlands. Technovation, 27: 221-32.
47. Wissema, J. G. 1976. Morphological analysis: Its application to a company TF investigation. Futures, 8: 146-53.
48. Wu, Y. J. 2005. Unlocking the value of business model patents in e-commerce. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18: 113-30.
49. Yoon, B. 2011. Strategic visualisation tools for managing technological information. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 377-97.
50. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. 2004. A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15: 37-50.
51. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. 2005. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72: 145-60.
52. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. 2007. Development of new technology forecasting algorithm: Hybrid approach for morphology analysis and conjoint analysis of patent information. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54: 588-99.
53. Yoon, B., Phaal, R. and Probert, D. 2008. Morphology analysis for technology roadmapping: Application of text mining. R&D Management, 38: 51-68.