How to use patent information to search potential technology partners in open innovation

Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 385-393

  Jeon, Jeonghwan ^a   Lee, Changyong ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Open innovation; Patent analysis; Technology intelligence; Technology partner

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052775783     PISSN: 09717544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Chesbrough H, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 2003.
2. Bierly P E, Damanpour F and Santoro M D, The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3) (2009) 481-509.
3. Peters R, Technology licensing: A win-win solution in the intellectual economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 421-425.
4. Kim H and Park Y, The effects of open innovation activity on performance of SMEs: The case of Korea, International Journal of Technology, 52 (3/4) (2010) 236-256.
5. Tether B, Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31 (6) (2002) 947-967.
6. Coombs R, Harvey M and Tether B. 2003 Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (6) (2003) 1125-1155.
7. Howells J, James A and Malik K, The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change, R&D Management, 33 (4) (2003) 395-409.
8. Laursen K and Salter A, Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2) (2006) 131-150.
9. Torkkeli M and Tuominen M, The contribution of technology selection to core competencies, International Journal of Production Economics, 77 (3) (2002) 271-284.
10. Chesbrough H, Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape (Harvard Business Press, Boston), 2006.
11. Lee S et al., Strategic partner selection for collaborative R&D: Literature-based technology intelligence, presented at the R&D Management Conference, Manchester, 30 June-2 July 2010.
12. Lichtenthaler U, Lichtenthaler E and Frishammar J, Technology commercialization intelligence: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (3) (2009) 301-315.
13. Escher J P, in Technology and Innovation Management on the Move, edited by H Tschirky, H H Jung and P Savioz (Orell Füssli, Zurich), 2003.
14. Huston L and Sakkab N, Connect and develop inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation, Harvard Business Review, 84 (3) (2006) 58-67.
15. Lichtenthaler U, Opening up strategic technology planning: extended roadmaps and functional markets, Management Decision, 46 (1) (2008) 77-91.
16. Bakici T, Almirall E and Wareham J, The underlying mechanisms of open innovation intermediaries, R&D Management Conference, Manchester, 30 June-2 July 2010.
17. Yoon B and Park Y, A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high technology trend, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15 (1) (2004) 37-50.
18. Blackman M, Provision of patent information: a national patent office perspective, World Patent Information, 17 (2) (1995) 115-123.
19. Liu S and Shyu J, Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis, International Journal of Technology Management, 13 (5/6) (1997) 661-680.
20. Ernst H, Patent information for strategic technology management, World Patent Information, 25 (3) (2003) 233-242.
21. Chang P L, Wu C C and Leu H J, Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: A case of carbon nanotube field emission display, Scientometrics, 82 (1) (2010) 5-19.
22. Moehrle M G, Walter L and Geritz A, Patent-based inventor profiles as a basis for human resource decisions in research and development, R & D Management, 35 (5) (2005) 513-524.
23. Phadnis R and Hirwani R R, Patent analysis as a tool for research planning: Case study of phytochemicals in tea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 221-231.
24. Mowery D C, Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the "third industrial revolution", Industrial and Corporate Change, 18 (1) (2009) 1-50.
25. Chiaromonte F, Open innovation through alliances and partnership: Theory and practice, International Journal of Technology Management, 33 (2/3) (2006) 111-114.
26. Howells J, Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy, 35 (5) (2006) 715-728.
27. Lakhani et al., The value of openness in scientific problem solving, Working paper no 07-050, Harvard Business School, http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/07-050.pdf (12 January 2011).
28. Lichtenthaler U and Ernst H, Innovation intermediaries: Why Internet marketplaces for technology have not yet met the expectations, Creativity and Innovation Management, 17 (1) (2008) 14-25.
29. Summary Report of the OECD Conference on Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation (OECD, Berlin, Germany) 2005.
30. Mowery D C, Oxley J E and Silverman B S, Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm, Research Policy, 27 (5) (1998) 507-523.
31. Wang M Y, Chiu T F and Chen W Y, Exploring potential R&D collaborators based on patent portfolio analysis: The case of biosensors, Portland International Centre for Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET) Conference (Oregon, USA), 2009, pp.322-330.
32. Yoon B, Yoon C and Park Y, On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map, R & D Management, 32 (4) (2002) 291-300.
33. Fattori M, Pedrazzi G and Turra R, Text mining applied to patent mapping: a practical business case, World Patent Information, 25 (4) (2003) 335-342.
34. Shin J and Park Y, Generation and application of patent claim map: Text mining and network analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 198-205.
35. Lent B, Agrawal R and Srikant R, Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (California, USA), 1997.
36. Tseng Y, Lin C and Lin Y, Text mining techniques for patent analysis, Information Processing and Management, 43 (5) (2007) 1216-1247.
37. Smith H, Automation of patent classification, World Patent Information, 24 (4) (2002) 269-271.
38. Trappey A J C and Trappey C V, An R&D knowledge management method for patent document summarization, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108 (2) (2008) 245-257.
39. Lee S, Yoon B and Park Y, An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach, Technovation, 29 (6/7) (2009) 481-497.
40. Moehrle M G and Geritz A, in Management of Technology: New Directions in Technology Management, edited by T Khalil, Y Hosni (Elsevier, Oxford, Amsterdam), 2007, pp. 19-29.
41. Lee C, Jeon J and Park Y, Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: a modified formal concept analysis approach, Technological Forecasting and Social Changes, 78 (2011) 690-702.
42. Narula R, R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalization, Technovation, 25 (2) (2004) 153-161.
43. Huston L and Sakkab N, Implementing open innovation, Research Technology Management, 50 (2) (2007) 21-25.