Development of new technology forecasting algorithm: Hybrid approach for morphology analysis and conjoint analysis of patent information

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 588-599

  Yoon, Byungun ^a   Park, Yongtae ^b  

^a Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis (CA); Hybrid approach; Morphology analysis (MA); Patent information; Technology forecasting

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FORECASTING; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

CITATION ANALYSIS; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY FORECASTING;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34547891503     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2007.900796     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. D. Zhu and A. L. Porter, "Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 69, pp. 495-506, 2002.
2. D. Barker and J. H. D. Smith, "Technology foresight using roadmaps," Long Range Plann., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 21-28, 1995.
3. R. Ayers, Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
4. J. P. Martino, "Technology forecasting - An overview," Manage. Sci. vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 28-33, 1980.
5. V. Coates, M. Farooque, R. Klavans, K. Lapid, H. A. Linstone, C. Pistorius, and A. L. Porter, "On the future of technological forecasting," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 67, pp. 1-17, 2001.
6. D. L. Mann, "Better technology forecasting using systemic innovation methods," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 70, pp. 779-795, 2003.
7. S. Mishra, S. G. Deshmukh, and P. Vrat, "Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 69, pp. 1-27, 2002.
8. J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon, Futures Research Methodology. Washington, DC: American Council for UNU, 2003.
9. J. G. Wissema, "Morphological analysis: Its application to a company TF investigation," Futures, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 146-153, 1976.
10. M. Bengisu and R. Nekhili, "Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology databases," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 835-844, Sep. 2006.
11. B. Twiss, Forecasting for Technical Decision. London: Peregrinus, 1992.
12. Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group, "Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 71, pp. 287-303, 2004.
13. H. Eto, "The suitability of technology forecasting/foresight methods for decision systems and strategy: A Japanese view," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 70, pp. 231-249, 2003.
14. J. P. Martino, "A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 70, pp. 719-733, 2003.
15. R. N. Kostoff, "The handbook of research impact assessment," 7th ed. Off. Naval Res. Arlington, VA, DTIC Rep. ADA 296021, 1997.
16. H. Small, "Update on science mapping: Creating large document space," Scientometrics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 275-293, 1997.
17. J. P. Martino, Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. New York: Elsevier, 1983.
18. S. Schnaars, Megamistakes: Forecasting and the Myth of Rapid Technological Change. New York: Free Press, 1989.
19. R. N. Kostoff and R. R. Schaller, "Science and technology roadmaps," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 132-143, May 2001.
20. F. Woundenberg, "An evaluation of Delphi," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 40, pp. 131-150, 1991.
21. Y. C. Yun, G. H. Jeong, and S. H. Kim, "A Delphi technology forecasting approach using a semi-Markov concept," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 40, pp. 273-287, 1991.
22. C. N. Madu, C. H. Kuei, and A. N. Madu, "Setting priorities for IT industry in Taiwan - A Delphi study," Long Range Plann., vol. 24, pp. 105-118, 1991.
23. D. L. Mann, "Better technology forecasting using systemic innovation methods," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 70, pp. 779-795, 2003.
24. V. Sushkov, "Technosocial competition," TRIZ J., pp. 1-14, Feb. 1997.
25. H. Majer, "Technology measurement: The functional approach," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 27, pp. 335-351, 2007.
26. J. H. Leinhard, "Some ideas about growth and quality in technology," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 27, pp. 265-282, 1985.
27. M. Pidd, Tools for Thinking - Modeling in Management Science. London: Wiley, 1996.
28. F. Zwicky, Discovery, Invention, Research - Through the Morphological Approach. Toronto, ON: Macmillan, 1969.
29. D. Cuesta-Frau, M. Aboy, J. McNames, and B. Goldstein, "Morphology analysis of intracranial pressure using pattern matching techniques," in Proc. 25th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico, Sep. 2003, vol. 3, pp. 17-21.
30. T. Ritchey, Using morphological analysis to evaluate preparedness for accidents involving hazardous materials. Presented at 4th Int. Conf. Local Authorities, 2002, [Online]. Available: Www.swemorph.com/pdf/ chem2.pdf.
31. M. Belaziz, A. Bouras, and J. M. Brun, "Morphological analysis for product design," Comput.-Aided Des., vol. 32, pp. 377-388, 2000.
32. R. Rhyne, "Field anomaly relaxation: The arts of usage," Futures vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 657-675, 1995.
33. T. Eriksson, "Scenario development using computer aided morphological analysis," [Online]. Available: www.swemorph.com/pdf/comwallis3.pdf.
34. P. E. Green, A. M. Krieger, and Y. L. Wind, "Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects," Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. S56-S73, 2001.
35. V. Srinivasan and A. D. Shocker, "Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pair-wise judgments," Psychometirika, vol. 38, pp. 479-493, 1973.
36. J. F. Hair, Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
37. P. E. Green and A. M. Krieger, "An application of a product positioning model to pharmaceutical products," Marketing Sci., vol. 11, pp. 117-132, 1992.
38. D. R. Wittink, R. Dick, and P. Cattin, "Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update," J. Marketing, vol. 53, pp. 91-96, 1989.
39. P. Cattin and D. R. Wittink, "Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey," J. Marketing, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 44-53, 1982.
40. R. D. Luce and J. Tukey, "Conjoint analysis: A new form of fundamental measurement," J. Math. Psychol., vol. 1, pp. 1-36, 1964.
41. P. E. Green and V. R. Rao, "Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data," J. Marketing Res., vol. 8, pp. 355-363, 1971.
42. R. M. Johnson, "Trade-off analysis of consumer values," J. Marketing Res., vol. 11, pp. 121-127, 1974.
43. P. E. Green and V. Srinivasan, "Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice," J. Marketing, vol. 54, pp. 3-19, 1990.
44. P. E. Green, S. M. Goldberg, and M. Montemayor, "A hybrid utility estimation model for conjoint analysis," J. Marketing, vol. 45, pp. 33-41, 1981.
45. R. M. Johnson, "Adaptive conjoint analysis," in Proc. Sawtooth Softw. Conf. Percept. Mapp., Conjoint Anal. Comput. Interviewing, 1987, pp. 253-265.
46. P. J. Lenk, W. S. DeSarbo, P. E. Green, and M. R. Young, "Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of part-worth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs," Marketing Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 173-191, 1996.
47. P. E. Green, J. D. Carroll, and S. M. Goldberg, "A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis," J. Marketing, vol. 45, pp. 17-37, 1981.
48. P. V. Balakrishnan and V. S. Jacob, "Genetic algorithms for product design," Manage. Sci., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1105-1117, 1996.
49. M. E. Pullman, W. L. Moore, and D. G. Wardell, "A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design," J. Prod. Innov. Manage., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 354-364, Sep. 2002.
50. A. Scholl, L. Manthey, R. Helm, and M. Steiner, "Solving multi attribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 760-777, 2005.
51. W. Haider and G. Ewing, "A model of tourist choices of hypothetical Caribbean destinations," Leisure Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33-47, 1990.
52. A. Bajaj, "Technology factors influencing senior information systems managers' decisions to adopt new computing architectures", Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
53. M. Mayer, "Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature," Res. Policy, vol. 29, pp. 409-434, 2002.
54. B. Yoon and Y. Park, "A text-mining-based patent network: Analytic tool for high-technology trend," J. High Technol. Manage. Res., vol. 15, pp. 37-50, 2004.
55. M. Hirschey and V. Richardson, "Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and US firms," Pacific-Basin Finance J., vol. 9, pp. 65-82, 2001.
56. B. Holl, A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. Cambridge, MA: NBER, 2000.
57. A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, "International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations," Econ. Innov. New Technol., vol. 8, pp. 105-136, 1999.
58. M. Karki, "Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool," World Patent Inf., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 269-272, 1997.
59. A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, Patents, Citations, and Innovations Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
60. J. Michel and B. Bettels, "Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports," Scientometrics, vol. 51, pp. 185-201, 2001.
61. V. Keselj, F. Peng, N. Cercone, and C. Thomas, "N-gram-based author profiles for authorship attribution," in Proc. Conf. Pacific Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, Nova Scotia, Canada, Aug. 2003, pp. 255-264.