Managing intellectual property in the financial services industry sector: Learning from Swiss Re

Technovation

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 196-207

  Bader, Martin A ^a  

^a BGW AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Financial services; Intellectual property; Knowledge Intensive Business Services; Patents; Service innovations; Swiss Re

Indexed keywords

CASE BASED REASONING; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE; INFORMATION SERVICES;

FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY SECTORS; KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES; LEGAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES; SERVICE INNOVATIONS;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 40149101552     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arundel A. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy 30 (2001) 611-624
2. Austin D.H. An event-study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 83 (1993) 253-258
3. BMBF. Bericht zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2006 (2006), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Berlin
4. Borg E.A. Knowledge, information and intellectual property: implications for marketing relationships. Technovation 21 (2001) 515-524
5. Brockhoff K. Forschung und Entwicklung: Planung und Kontrolle. fifth ed (1999), Oldenburg, München
6. Brockhoff K., Ernst H., and Hundhausen E. Gains and pains from licensing-patent-portfolios as strategic weapons in the cardiac rhythm management industry. Technovation 19 (1999) 605-614
7. Cuypers F. The Path to Knowledge is Patently Clear (2003), Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich
8. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 4 (1989) 532-550
9. Ernst H. Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance. Technovation 15 (1995) 225-240
10. Ernst H. Patentinformationen für die strategische Planung von Forschung und Entwicklung (1996), Gabler, Wiesbaden
11. Ernst H. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy 30 (2001) 143-157
12. Ernst H. Patentmanagement. In: Specht D., and Möhrle M.G. (Eds). Lexikon Technologiemanagement (2002), Gabler, Wiesbaden 214-218
13. Ernst H. Strategisches IP-management in schnell wachsenden Technologieunternehmen. In: Hommel U., and Knecht T. (Eds). Wertorientiertes Start-Up Management. Grundlagen, Instrumente, Strategien (2002), Vahlen, Munich 292-319
14. Ernst H. Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4 (2002) 1-40
15. Ernst H., and Omland N. Patentmanagement junger Technologieunternehmen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 2 (2003) 95-113 (special issue)
16. Faix A. Patente im strategischen Marketing. Sicherung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit durch systematische Patentanalyse und Patentnutzung (1998), Erich Schmidt, Berlin
17. FhG, 2003. Patents in the service industries. Final Report. Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.
18. Gassmann, O., 1999. Praxisnähe mit Fallstudienforschung, Wissenschaftsmanagement.
19. Gassmann O., and Bader M.A. Bodyguards für Ihre Ideen. io New Management 4 (2004) 10-14
20. Gassmann O., and Bader M.A. Patentmanagement. Innovationen erfolgreich nutzen und schützen (2006), Springer, Berlin
21. Grindley P.C., and Teece D.J. Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review 39 (1997) 8-41
22. Hanel P. Intellectual property rights business management practices: a survey of literature. Technovation 26 8 (2006) 895-931
23. Hargadon A., and Sutton R.I. Wie Innovationen systematisch erarbeitet werden. Harvard Business Manager 6 (2000) 46-54
24. Harhoff D., and Reitzig M. Strategien zur Gewinnmaximierung bei der Anmeldung von Patenten. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 71 (2001) 509
25. Harmann, B.-G., 2003. Patente als strategisches Instrument zum Management technologischer Diskontinuitäten. No. 2808, Dissertation at University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
26. Hipp, C., 2000. Innovationsprozesse im Dienstleistungssektor. Eine theoretisch und empirisch basierte Innovationstypologie. Physica, Heidelberg.
27. Hurmelinna P., Kyläheiko K., and Jauhiainen T. The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations: theoretical re-appraisal and empirical analysis. Technovation 27 3 (2007) 133-144
28. Jennwein, K., 2005. Intellectual Property Management. The Role of Technology-Brands in the Appropriation of Technological Innovation. Physica, Heidelberg.
29. Klinger, R., 2003. Schutz von Dienstleistungsinnovationen gegen Imitation. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
30. Lerner J. The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1994) 319-332
31. Lynn G.S., Morone J.G., and Paulson A.S. Wie echte Produktinnovationen entstehen. Harvard Business Manager 4 (1996) 80-91
32. Miles I., Andersen B., Boden M., and Howells J. Service production and intellectual property. International Journal of Technology Management 20 (2000) 95-115
33. Shane S. Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science 47 (2001) 205-220
34. Smith M., and Hansen F. Managing intellectual property: a strategic point of view. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (2002) 366-374
35. Sullivan P.H. Profiting From Intellectual Capital (2001), Wiley, New York
36. Swiss Re, 2004a. Intellectual Property Report 2003; authored by Bischof, D. and F. Cuypers. Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich.
37. Swiss Re. Geschäftsbericht 2003. Jahresbericht (2004), Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich
38. Wehling, A., 2002. Schutz innovativer Versicherungsdienstleistungen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
39. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. second ed (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks