The role of cultural forms in tangible interaction design

TEI 2013 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 117-124

  Horn, Michael S ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural forms; Design; Tangible interaction

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL FORMS; NEW FUNCTIONS; SOCIAL ACTIVITIES; TANGIBLE INTERACTION;

DESIGN;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876817451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2460625.2460643     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Antle, A.N., Corness, G., & Droumeva, M. (2009). Human-computer intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 2(3), 235-254.
2. Bakker, S., Antle, A.N., van den Hoven, E. (2012). Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 433-449.
3. Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M.S. Khine & I.M. Saleh (eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers, and collaboration in education, Springer, 525-552.
4. Dourish, P. Where the action is: Foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press (2001).
5. Fishkin, K.P. (2004). A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 347-357.
6. Fleck, R., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., Marshall, P., Carr, A., Rick, J. & Bonnett, V. Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table. In ITS'09, ACM (2009), 189-196.
7. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., & Landay J. The design of eco-feedback technology. In CHI'10, ACM (2010), 1999-2008.
8. González, N., Moll, L.C., & Amanti, C. Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Erlbaum (2005).
9. Horn, M.S., Crouser, R.J., & Bers, M.U. (2012). Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Pers. and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4).
10. Horn, M.S., Leong, Z.A., Block, F., Diamond, J., Evans, E.M., Phillips, B., and Shen, C. Of BATs and APEs: An interactive tabletop game for natural history museums. In Proc. CHI'12, ACM (2012), 2059-2068.
11. Hornecker, E., A design theme for tangible interaction: Embodied facilitation. In Proc. ECSCW'05, 23-43.
12. Hornecker, E. Interactions around a contextually embedded system. In Proc. TEI'10, ACM (2010), 169-176.
13. Hornecker, E. Beyond affordance: Tangibles' hybrid nature. In Proc. TEI'12, ACM (2012), 175-182.
14. Hurtienne, J. & Israel, J.H. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions-Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In Proc. TEI'07, ACM (2007), 127-134.
15. Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., & Weber, K. Sad is heavy and happy is light: Population stereotypes of tangible object attributes. In Proc. TEI'09, ACM (2009), 127-134.
16. Jacob, R.J.K., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L., Horn, M.S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T., Zigelbaum, J. Reality-based interaction: A framework for post-WIMP interfaces. In Proc. CII'08, ACM (2008), 201-210.
17. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press (2003).
18. Lee, C. (2003). Toward a framework for culturally responsive design in multimedia computer environments: Cultural modeling as a case. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(1), 42-61.
19. Macaranas, A., Antle, A.N., & Riecke, B.E. Bridging the gap: Attribute and spatial metaphors for tangible interface design. In TEI'12, ACM (2012), 161-168.
20. Mackay, W.E. (2000). Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(4), 311-340.
21. Marshall, P. Morris, R. Rogers, Y. Kreitmayer, S. & Davies, M. Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proc. CHI'11 ACM (2011), 3033-3042.
22. Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., & Pantidi, N. Using f-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. In CSCW'11, ACM (2011).
23. McNerney, T. (2004). From turtles to tangible programming bricks: explorations in physical language design. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 326-337.
24. Nasir, N.S. (2005). Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: Strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 5-34.
25. Norman, D.A. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books (1988).
26. Norman, D.A. Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books (2004).
27. Norman, D.A. Signifiers, not affordances. interactions, 15(6). ACM (2008).
28. Satwicz, T. & Stevens, R. (2008). Playing with representations: How do kids make use of quantitative representations in video games? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(3), 179-206.
29. Saxe, G.B. Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Erlbaum (1991).
30. Saxe, G.B. Cognition, development, and cultural practices. In E. Turiel (Ed.), Culture and Development. New Directions in Child Psychology. Jossey-Bass (1999).
31. Sherin, B., Bang, M., & Krakowski, M. (2004). Micropractices and the four meanings of "epistemology." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
32. Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. In-game, in room, and in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In K. Salen (Ed.) The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, MIT Press (2007), 41-66.
33. Strengers, Y. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In CHI'11, ACM (2011), 2135-2144.
34. Suchman, L. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge University Press (2007).
35. Ullmer, B. & Ishii, H. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Sys. Journal, 39(2000), 915-931.
36. Wigdor, D. & Wixon, D. (2011). Brave NUI world: Designing natural user interfaces for touch and gesture. Elsevier.
37. Wyeth, P. (2008). How young children learn to program with sensor, action, and logic blocks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 517-550.
38. Xie, L., Antle, A.N., & Motamedi, N. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In TEI'08, ACM (2008), 191-198.