Interactions around a contextually embedded system

TEI'10 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 169-176

  Hornecker, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Co experience; Context; CSCW; Embedded; Externalization; Interactivity; Museum; Shareability; Tangible

Indexed keywords

BARRIER-FREE; CO-EXPERIENCE; INTERACTIVITY; SYSTEM VARIANTS; VISITOR EXPERIENCES;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 77950822311     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1709886.1709916     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Allen, S. Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education Vol88(S1) 2004, pp. S17-S33 (Pubitemid 39056829)
2. ART+COM. http://www.artcom.de/index.php?option=com-acprojects&page= 6&id=58&Itemid=144&details=0&lang=en (read July 2009) and http://www.artcom.de/index.php?option=com-acprojects&page=6&id= 59&Itemid=144&details=0&lang=en
3. Battarbee, K., Defining co-experience. Proc. of DPPI 2003, ACM. 109-113.
4. Blomberg, J. et al. Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler, Namioka (eds.) Participatory Design. Lawrence Erlbaum 1993, 123-155
5. Bradburne. J. Is interactivity different for fine art as opposed to design? Proc. of Interactive Learning in Museums of Art. V&A Museum 2002.
6. Brignull, H., Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. Proc. of INTERACT 2003, pp. 17-24
7. Ciolfi, L.; Bannon, L. Learning from museum visits: Shaping design sensitivities. Technical Report IDC-University of Limerick (2002).
8. Dourish, P. Where the action is. The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press (2001)
9. Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J., Jonsson, M. Towards a new set of ideals: consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction. Proc. of TEI 2008. ACM. 223-230 (Pubitemid 351585381)
10. Heath, C., vom Lehn, D. Misconstruing interactivity. Proc. of Interactive Learning in Museums of Art. V&A Museum 2002.
11. Hornecker, E. I don't understand it either, but it is cool" Visitor Interactions with a Multi-Touch Table in a Museum. Proc. of IEEE Tabletop 2008. 121-128
12. Hornecker, E.; Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. Proc. of CHI 2007, ACM. 437-446 (Pubitemid 44032128)
13. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y. Entry and Access - How shareability comes about. Proc. of DPPI 2007. ACM, 328-342
14. Hornecker, E., Stifter, M. Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. Proc. of OzCHI 2006. ACM, pp. 135-142
15. Jordan, B., Henderson, A. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.4, no.1, 1995, pp. 39-103.
16. Kelly, L., Savage, G., Griffin, J., Tonkin, S. Knowledge quest: Australian families visit museums. Australian Museum and National Museum of Australia 2004
17. Museum für Naturkunde Berlin http://www.museum.huberlin.de/index- english.html
18. Palmquist, S.D., Crowley, K. Studying dinosaur learning on an island of expertise. In Goldman, Pea, Barron & Derry (eds). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2007
19. vom Lehn, D., J. Hindmarsh, P. Luff, C. Heath. Engaging Constable: Revealing art with new technology. Proc. of CHI 2007. ACM. 1485-1494
20. Wakkary, R., Hatala, M. Situated play in a tangible interface and adaptive audio museum guide. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, #3(11), 2007. 171-191 (Pubitemid 46359473)
21. Wakkary, R., Hatala, M., Muise, K., Tanenbaum, K., Budd J., Kurio: A Museum Guide for Families. Proc. of TEI 2009, ACM. 215-222
22. Whitcomb, A. Interactivity: Thinking beyond. In: Macdonald (ed.): Companion to Museum Studies. Blackwell Publishing 2006. 333-336