Bridging the gap: Attribute and spatial metaphors for tangible interface design

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, TEI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 161-168

  MacAranas, Anna ^a   Antle, Alissa N ^a   Riecke, Bernhard E ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Design guidelines; Image schemas; Intuitive interaction; Metaphor; Population stereotypes; Tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

DESIGN GUIDELINES; IMAGE SCHEMAS; INTUITIVE INTERACTION; METAPHOR; POPULATION STEREOTYPES; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES;

ABSTRACTING; DESIGN; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84859076653     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2148131.2148166     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Antle, A.N., Corness, G., and Bevans, A. Springboard: Designing image schema based embodied interaction for an abstract domain. In Human Computer Interaction Series. Springer, 2011, in press. Available online http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-433-3
2. Antle, A.N., Corness, G., and Droumeva, M. Humancomputer intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction. Int. J. Arts and Technology 2, 3 (2009), 235-254.
3. Antle, A.N., Corness, G., Bakker, S., Droumeva, M., van den Hoven, E., and Bevans, A. Designing to support reasoned imagination through embodied metaphor. In Proc. C&C 2009, ACM Press (2009), 275-284.
4. Bakker, S., Antle, A.N., and van den Hoven, E. Identifying embodied metaphors in children's soundaction mappings. In Proc. IDC 2009, ACM Press (2009), 140-149.
5. Evans, V. and Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics: an Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006.
6. Fitzmaurice, G.W. and Ishii, H. Bricks: Laying the foundation for graspable user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995), 442-449.
7. Hampe, B., ed. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
8. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 437-446. (Pubitemid 44032128)
9. van den Hoven, E. and Mazalek, A. Tei goes on: Tangible and embedded interaction. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 2 (2008), 91-96.
10. Hurtienne, J. and Israel, J.H. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions - Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In Proc. TEI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 127-134. (Pubitemid 47482760)
11. Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., and Weber, K. Sad is heavy and happy is light: Population stereotypes of tangible object attributes. In Proc. TEI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 61-68.
12. Johnson, M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1987.
13. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 2003.
14. Neale, D.C. and Carroll, J.M. The role of metaphors in user interface design. In M. Helander, T.K. Landauer and P. Prabhu, eds., Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science, 1997, 441-462.
15. Norman, D.A. and Nielsen, J. Gestural Interfaces: A Step Backwards in Usability. http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/gestural-interfaces-a-step-backwards-in- usability-6.html (accessed Dec 8 2011)
16. Spool, J.M. What Makes a Design Seem 'Intuitive'? User Interface Engineering, 2005.http://www.uie.com/articles/design-intuitive/ (accessed Dec 8 2011)
17. Svanaes, D. and Verplank, W. In search of metaphors for tangible user interfaces. In Proc. DARE 2000, ACM Press (2000), 121-129.
18. Underkoffler, J. and Ishii, H. Urp: A luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 386-393.
19. Software Implementing TUIO.http://www.tuio.org/?software (accessed Dec 8 2011)