Vertebrate paralogous conserved noncoding sequences may be related to gene expressions in brain

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 140-150

  Matsunami, Masatoshi ^a,b,d   Saitou, Naruya ^a,b,c  

^a GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENETICS   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gene regulation; Genome duplication; Noncoding sequences; Vertebrates

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84876569149     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs128     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al-Shahrour F, et al. 2007. FatiGO+: a functional profiling tool for genomic data. Integration of functional annotation, regulatorymotifs and interaction data with microarray experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 35: W91-W96.
2. Altschul SF, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Becker TS, Lenhard B. 2007. The random versus fragile breakage models of chromosome evolution: a matter of resolution. Mol Genet Genomics. 278:487-491.
4. Bejerano G, et al. 2004. Ultra conserved elements in the human genome. Science 304:1321-1325.
5. Blomme T, et al. 2007. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol. 7:R43.
6. Cohn MJ, Tickle C. 1999. Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes. Nature 399:474-479.
7. Creyghton MP, et al. 2010. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:21931-21936.
8. Dehal P, Boore JL. 2005. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3:1700-1708.
9. de la Calle-Mustienes E, et al. 2005. A functional survey of the enhancer activity of conserved non-coding sequences from vertebrate Iroquois cluster gene deserts. Genome Res. 15:1061-1072.
10. ENCODE Project Consortium. 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57-74.
11. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.
12. Garcia-Fernández J. 2005. The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters. Nat Rev Genet. 6:881-892.
13. Glazov EA, Pheasant M, McGraw EA, Bejerano G, Mattick JS. 2005. Ultra conserved elements in insect genomes: a highly conserved intronic sequence implicated in the control of homothorax mRNA splicing. Genome Res. 15:800-808.
14. Heintzman ND, et al. 2007. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat Genet. 39:311-318.
15. Heintzman ND, et al. 2009. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459:108-112.
16. Holland LZ, et al. 2008. The amphioxus genome illuminates vertebrate origins and cephalochordate biology. Genome Res. 18:1100-1111.
17. Hufton AL, et al. 2009. Deeply conserved chordate noncoding sequences preserve genome synteny but not drive gene duplication retention. Genome Res. 19:2036-2051.
18. Kelso J, et al. 2003. eVOC: a controlled vocabulary for unifying gene expression data. Genome Res. 13:1222-1230.
19. Kikuta H, Fredman D, Rinkwitz S, Lenhard B, Becker TS. 2007. Retroviral enhancer detection insertions in zebrafish combined with comparative genomics reveal genomic regulatory blocks - a fundamental feature of vertebrate genomes. Genome Biol. 8(1 Suppl):S4.
20. Kim TH, et al. 2005. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436:876-880.
21. Kim TH, et al. 2007. Analysis of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. Cell 128:1231-1245.
22. Kuraku S, Meyer A, Kuratani S. 2009. Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: did cyclostomes diverge before or after? Mol Biol Evol. 26:47-59.
23. Lee AP, Kerk SY, Tan YY, Brenner S, Venkatesh B. 2011. Ancient vertebrate conserved noncoding elements have been evolving rapidly in teleost fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 28:1205-1215.
24. Lehoczky JA, Williams ME, Innis JW. 2004. Conserved expression domains for genes upstream and within the HoxA and HoxD clusters suggests a long-range enhancer existed before cluster duplication. Evol Dev. 6: 423-430.
25. Lundin LG, Larhammar D, Hallböök F. 2003. Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:53-63.
26. Makino T, McLysaght A. 2010. Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:9270-9274.
27. Matsunami M, Sumiyama K, Saitou N. 2010. Evolution of conserved non-coding sequences within the vertebrate Hox clusters through the two-round whole duplications revealed by phylogenetic footprinting analysis. J Mol Evol. 71:427-436.
28. McEwen GK, et al. 2006. Ancient duplicated conserved noncoding elements in vertebrates: a genomic and functional analysis. Genome Res. 16:451-465.
29. McEwen GK, Goode DK, Parker HJ, Woolfe A, Callaway H, et al. 2009. Early evolution of conserved regulatory sequences associated with development in vertebrates. PLoS Genet. 12:e1000762.
30. Nakatani Y, Takeda H, Kohara Y, Morishita S. 2007. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 17:1254-1265.
31. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Ørom UA, et al. 2010. Long noncoding RNAs with enhancer-like function in human cells. Cell 43:46-58.
33. Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194-197.
34. Pennacchio LA, et al. 2006. In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444:499-502.
35. Putnam NH, et al. 2008. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453:1064-1071.
36. Qiu H, Hildebrand F, Kuraku S, Meyer A. 2011. Unresolved orthology and peculiar coding sequence properties of lamprey genes: the KCNA gene family as test case. BMC Genomics 12:325.
37. Rada-Iglesias A, et al. 2011. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470:279-283.
38. Rinn JL, et al. 2007. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129:1311-1323.
39. Shen Y, et al. 2012. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488:116-20.
40. Spitz F, Gonzalez F, Duboule D. 2003. A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell 113:405-417.
41. Takahashi M, Saitou N. 2012. Identification and characterization of lineage-specific highly conserved noncoding sequences in mammalian genomes. Genome Biol Evol. 4:641-657.
42. Vavouri T, Walter K, Gilks WR, Lehner B, Elgar G. 2007. Parallel evolution of conserved non-coding elements that target a common set of developmental regulatory genes from worms to humans. Genome Biol. 8:R15.
43. Visel A, Minovitsky S, Dubchak I, Pennacchio LA. 2007. VISTA Enhancer Browser - a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D88-D92.
44. Woolfe A, et al. 2005. Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol. 3:116-130.
45. Woolfe A, et al. 2007. CONDOR: a database resource of developmentally- associated conserved non-coding elements. BMC Dev Biol. 7: 100.
46. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 7:203-214.