The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 881-892

  Garcia Fernàndez, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; HOX PROTEIN;

COMPARATIVE GENE MAPPING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GERM LAYER; HOX GENE; HUMAN; METAZOON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL KILLER CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; T CELL LEUKEMIA;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; METAZOA;

EID: 28844477866     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg1723     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283-302 (1992).
2. Duboule, D. Temporal collinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Development Suppl. 135-142 (1994).
3. Kmita, M. & Duboule, D. Organizing axes in time and space: 25 years of collinear tinkering. Science 301, 331-333 (2003).
4. Hurst, L. D., Pál, C. & Lercher, M. J. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 299-310 (2004).
5. Brooke, N. M., Garcia-Fernàndez, J. & Holland, P. W. H. The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster. Nature 392, 920-922 (1998).
6. Holland, L. Z. Non-neural ectoderm is really neural: evolution of developmental patterning mechanisms in the non-neural ectoderm of chordates and the problem of sensory cell homologies. J. Exp. Zool. B 304B, 1-20 (2005).
7. Jagla, K., Bellard, M. & Frasch, M. A cluster of Drosophila homeobox genes involved in mesoderm differentiation programs. Bioessays 23, 125-133 (2001). This paper presents a complete description of linkage information and expression data for the NK cluster genes in D. melanogaster, the organism in which temporal collinearity of the NK cluster genes in the mesoderm was first noticed.
8. Martínez, P. & Amemiya, C. T. Genomics of the HOX gene cluster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 133, 571-580 (2002).
9. Prince, E. The Hox paradox: more complex(s) than imagined. Dev. Biol. 249, 1-15 (2002).
10. Ferrier, D. E. K. & Minguillón, C. Evolution of the Hox/ParaHox gene clusters. Int J. Dev. Biol. 47, 605-611 (2003).
11. de Rosa, R. et al. Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399, 772-776 (1999).
12. Powers, T. P. & Amemiya, C. T. Evidence for a Hox14 paralog group in vertebrates. Curr. Biol. 14, R183-R184 (2004).
13. Minguillón C. et al. No more than 14: the end of the amphioxus Hox cluster. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 1, 19-23 (2005).
14. Hooman, K., Moghadam, H. K., Ferguson, M. M. & Danzmann, R. G. Organization of Hox clusters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a tetraploid model species. J. Mol. Evol. 30 Sep 2005 (doi:10.1007/s00239-004- 0338-7).
15. Cook, C. E., Jiménez, E., Akam, M. & Saló, E. The Hox gene complement of acoel flatworms, a basal bilaterian clade. Evol. Dev. 6, 154-163 (2004).
16. Baguñà, J. & Riutort, M. The dawn of bilaterian animals. The case of acoelomorph flatworms. Bioessays 26, 1046-1057 (2004).
17. Finnerty, J. R., Pang, K., Burton, P., Paulson, D. & Martindale, M. Q. Origins of bilateral symmetry: Hox and dpp expression in a sea anemone. Science 304, 1335-1337 (2004).
18. Ferrier, D. E. K. & Holland, P. W. H. Sipunculan ParaHox genes. Evol. Dev. 3, 263-270 (2001).
19. Ferrier. D. E. K. & Holland, P. W. H. Ciona intestinalis ParaHox genes: evolution of Hox/ParaHox cluster integrity, developmental mode, and temporal colinearity. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 412-417 (2001).
20. Edvardsen, R. B. et al. Remodelling of the homeobox gene complement in the tunicate Oikopleura dioica. Curr. Biol. 15, R12-R13 (2005).
21. Finnerty, J. R. & Martindale, M. Q. Ancient origins of axial patterning genes: Hox genes and ParaHox genes in the Cnidaria. Evol. Dev. 1, 16-23 (1999).
22. Ferrier, D. E. K. & Holland, P. W. H. Ancient origin of the Hox gene cluster. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 33-38 (2001).
23. Dush. M. K. & Martin, G. R. Analysis of mouse Evx genes: Evx-1 displays graded expression in the primitive streak. Dev. Biol. 151, 273-287 (1992).
24. Miller, D. J. & Miles, A. Homeobox genes and the zootype. Nature 365, 215-216 (1993).
25. Banerjee-Basu, S. & Baxevanis, A. D. Molecular evolution of the homeodomain family of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3258-3269 (2001).
26. Minguillón. C. & Garcia-Fernàndez, J. Genesis and evolution of the Evx and Mox genes and the extended Hox and ParaHox gene clusters. Genome Biol. 4, R12 (2003).
27. Garcia-Fernàndez, J. Hox, ParaHox, ProtoHox: facts and guesses. Heredity 94, 145-152 (2005).
28. Seo, H. C. et al. (2004). Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature 431, 67-71 (2004). This paper describes the Hox complement of the Urochordate Oikopleura dioica, an animal that has a compact genome, and shows that the Hox cluster is dispersed across the genome. Although no Hox gene is linked to any other (in that they are at least 250 kb apart), there is still evidence for some residual spatial collinearity of expression.
29. Matsui, T., Hirai, M., Hirano, M. & Kurosawa, Y. The HOX complex neighbored by EVX gene, as well as two other homoebox-containing genes, the GBX-class and the EN-class, are located on the same chormosomes 2 and 7. FEBS Lett. 336, 107-110 (1993).
30. Pollard, S. & Holland, P. W. H. Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr. Biol. 10, 1059-1062 (2000).
31. Castro, L. F. & Holland, P. W. H. Chromosomal mapping of ANTP class homeobox genes in amphioxus: piecing together ancestral genomes. Evol. Dev. 5, 459-465 (2003). The authors analyse the linkage of Hox, ParaHox and NK genes in the cephalochordate amphioxus, and confirm that the pre-duplicative amphioxus genome contains the three main blocks of genes, which are similar in organization to the ancestral chordate condition that has been deduced from the human genome.
32. Kim, Y. & Nirenberg, M. Drosophila NK-homeobox genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7716-7720 (1989).
33. Jagla, K., et al. ladybird, a tandem of homeobox genes that maintain late wingless expression in terminal and dorsal epidermis of the Drosophila embryo. Development 124, 91-100 (1997).
34. Luke, G. N. et al. Dispersal of NK homeobox gene clusters in amphioxus and humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5292-5295 (2003). This study shows that the composition of the NK gene cluster in the pre-duplicative amphioxus genome is broken at the same positions as in the vertebrate clusters. The authors conclude that the constraints to maintain linkage in chordates have been relaxed, whereas a strong functional constraint must be present in D. melanogaster.
35. Gauchat, D. et al. Evolution of Antp-class genes and differential expression of Hydra Hox/ParaHox genes in anterior patterning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4493-4498 (2000).
36. Manuel, M. & LeParco, Y. Homeobox gene diversification in the calcareous sponge Sycon raphanus. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17, 97-107 (2000).
37. Coutinho, C., Fonseca, R. N., Mansure, J. J. & Borojevic, R. Early steps in the evolution of multicellularity: deep structural and functional homologies among homeobox genes in sponges and higher metazoans. Mech. Dev. 120, 429-440 (2003).
38. Hill, A., Tetrault, J. & Hill, M. Isolation and expression analysis of a poriferan Antp-class Bar-/Bsh-like homeobox gene. Dev. Genes. Evol. 214, 515-523 (2004). This article includes a recent update on and the phylogenetic analyses of all known ANTP-class homeobox genes in sponges.
39. Lowe, C. J. et al. Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system. Cell 113, 853-865 (2003).
40. Freund, J. N, Domon-Dell, C., Kedinger, M. & Duluc, I. The Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 homeobox genes in the intestine. Biochem. Cell Biol. 76, 957-969 (1998).
41. Moreno, E. & Morata, G. Caudal is the Hox gene that specifies the most posterior Drosophila segment. Nature 26, 873-877 (1999).
42. Offield, M. F. et al. PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Development 122, 983-995 (1996).
43. Wysocka-Diller, J., Aisemberg, G. O. & Macagmo, E. R. A novel homeobox cluster expressed in repeated structures of the midgut. Dev. Biol. 171, 439-447 (1995).
44. Weiss, J. B. et al. Dorsoventral patterning in the Drosophila central nervous system: the intermediate neuroblasts defective homeobox gene specifies intermediate column identity. Genes Dev. 12, 3591-3602 (1998)
45. Holland, P. W. H. Beyond the Hox: how widespread is homeobox gene clustering? J. Anat. 199, 13-23 (2001).
46. Rosanas-Urgell, A., Marfany, G. & Garcia-Fernàndez, J. Pdx1-related homeodomain transcription factors are distinctly expressed in adult pancreatic islets. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 237, 59-66 (2005).
47. Grapin-Botton, A. & Melton, D. A. Endoderm development: from patterning to organogenesis. Trends Genet. 16, 124-130 (2000).
48. Schafer, K., Neuhaus, P., Kruse, J. & Braun, T. The homeobox gene Lbx1 specifies a subpopulation of cardiac neural crest necessary for normal heart development. Circ. Res. 10, 73-80 (2003).
49. Reecy, J. M. et al. Chicken Nkx-2.8: a novel homeobox gene expressed in early heart progenitor cells and pharyngeal pouch-2 and-3 endoderm. Dev. Biol. 188, 295-311 (1997).
50. Pera, E. M. & Kessel, M. Demarcation of ventral territories by the homeobox gene NKX2.1 during early chick development. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 168-171 (1998).
51. Martindale. M. Q., Pang, K. & Finnerty. J. R. Investigating the origins of triploblasty: 'mesodermal' expression in a diplobastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa). Development 131, 2463-2474 (2004). Based on expression data from anthozoan embryos, the authors argue in favour of a primitively diploblastic origin of cnidarians, and discuss the possibility that cnidarians are simplified triploblasts.
52. Seipel, K. & Schmid, V. Evolution of striated muscle: jellyfish and the origin of triploblasty. Dev. Biol. 282, 14-26 (2005). Based on data from jellyfish the authors argue in favour of a triplobastic origin of cnidarians.
53. Stephenson, T. A. The British Sea Anemones Vol. 1 (Ray Society, London, 1928).
54. Hyman, L. H. The Invertebrates. Protozoa Through Ctenophra (McGraw-Hill, New York (1940).
55. Hayward, D. C. et al. Localized expression of a dpp/BMP2/4 ortholog in a coral embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8106-8111 (2002).
56. Finnerty J. R. The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa: how old is bilateral symmetry? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 523-529 (2003).
57. Muller, W. E. et al. Bauplan of urmetazoa: basis for genetic complexity of metazoa. Int. Rev. Cytol. 235, 53-92 (2004).
58. Maldonado, M. Choanoflagellates, choanocytes, and animal multicellularity. Inv. Biol. 123, 1-22 (2004). This data-rich paper summarizes the embryology of sponges. The author provocatively suggests that higher metazoans are derived from the complex larval stages of sponges, and that some sort of bilaterality is already present in sponge embryogenesis.
59. Jakob, W. et al. The Trox-2 Hox/ParaHox gene of Trichoplax (Placozoa) marks an epithelial boundary. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 170-175 (2004).
60. King, N., Hittinger, C. T. & Carroll, S. B. Evolution of key cell signaling and adhesion protein families predates animal origins. Science 301, 361-363 (2003).
61. Brooke, M. N. & Holland, P. W. H. The evolution of multicellularity and early animal genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 599-603 (2003).
62. Finnerty, J. R., Paulson, D., Burton, P., Pang, K. & Martindale, M. Q. Early evolution of a homeobox gene: the parahox gene Gsx in the Cnidaria and the Bilateria. Evol. Dev. 4, 331-345 (2003).
63. Oliver, B. & Mistelli, T. A non-random walk through the genome. Genome Biol. 6, 214 (2005).
64. Lewis, E. B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565-570 (1978).
65. Spitz, F., Gonzalez, F. & Duboule, D. A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell 113, 405-417 (2003).
66. Zakany, J., Kmita, M. & Duboule, D. A dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior assymetry. Science 304, 1669-1672 (2004). Elegantly engineered mice led Duboule's team to identify a further global regulator of the Hox cluster that is involved in the embryonic development of the limb, and to propose that there is more than one class of collinearity.
67. Chambeyron, S. & Bickmore, W. A. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. Genes Dev. 10, 1119-1130 (2004).
68. Chambeyron, S., DaSilva, N. R., Lawson, K. A. & Bikmore, W. A. Nuclear re-organisation of the HoxB complex during mouse embryonic development. Development 132, 2215-2223 (2005).
69. Ikuta, T., Yoshida, N., Satoh, N. & Saiga, H. Ciona intestinalis Hox gene cluster: its dispersed structure and residual colinear expression in development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15118-15123 (2004).
70. Arenas-Mena, C., Cameron, A. R. & Davidson, E. H. Spatial expression of the Hox complex in the indirect development of a sea urchin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13062-13067 (1998).
71. Cameron, R. A. et al. Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin Hox cluster. J. Exp. Zool. Part B 22 Aug 2005 (doi:10.1002/jez.b.21070).
72. Lewis, E. B., Pfeiffer, B. D., Mathog, D. R. & Celniker, S. E. Evolution of the homeobox complex in the Diptera. Curr. Biol. 13, R587-R588 (2003).
73. Negre, B., et al. Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex. Genome Res. 15, 692-700 (2005). The breakage point in distinct Drosophila species indicates that the Hox cluster in insects is disintegrating by phylogenetic inertia, as selective pressure for temporal collinearity is absent. The comparision of full Hox cluster sequences indicates that the breakages do not disrupt individual enhancers, which are generally located at the 5′ end of each Hox gene.
74. Yasukochi, Y. et al. Organization of the Hox gene cluster of the silkworm, Bombyx mori: a split of the Hox cluster in a non-Drosophila insect. Dev. Genes Evol. 21, 606-614 (2004).
75. Aboobaker, A. A. & Blaxter, M. L. Hox gene loss during dynamic evolution of the nematode cluster. Curr. Biol. 13, 37-40 (2003).
76. Spitz, F. & Duboule, D. Reproduction in clusters. Nature 434, 715-716 (2005).
77. MacLean, J. A., et al. Rhox: a new homeobox gene cluster. Cell 120, 369-382 (2005).
78. Gilbert S. F. Opening Darwin's black box: teaching evolution through developmental genetics: Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 735-741 (2003).
79. Holland, N. D. Early cental nervous system evolution: an era of skin brains? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 617-627 (2003).
80. Luke, G. N. The Amphioxus NK Cluster. Thesis, Univ. Reading, UK (2004).