Evolutionary rate covariation in meiotic proteins results from fluctuating evolutionary pressure in yeasts and mammals

Genetics

Volumn 193, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 529-538

  Clark, Nathan L ^a   Alani, Eric ^b   Aquadro, Charles F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; MEIOSIS PROTEIN; MISMATCH REPAIR PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PIWI INTERACTING RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CANDIDA GLABRATA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSING OVER; EVOLUTIONARY PRESSURE; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; EVOLUTIONARY RATE COVARIATION; FUNGAL REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RAT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRANSPOSON; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; MAMMALS; MEIOSIS; PHYLOGENY; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING; YEASTS;

CANDIDA GLABRATA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84876373584     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.145979     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ashburner, M., C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake, D. Botstein, H. Butler et al., 2000 Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25(1): 25-29.
2. Balakrishnan, R., J. Park, K. Karra, B. C. Hitz, G. Binkley et al., 2012 YeastMine-an integrated data warehouse for Saccharomyces cerevisiae data as a multipurpose tool-kit. Database (Oxford) bar062.
3. Bell, G., 1982 The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press, Berkeley.
4. Bennett, R. J., and A. D. Johnson, 2003 Completion of a parasexual cycle in Candida albicans by induced chromosome loss in tetraploid strains. EMBO J. 22(10): 2505-2515.
5. Bennetzen, J. L., and B. D. Hall, 1982 Codon selection in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 257(6): 3026-3031.
6. Biggins, S., N. Bhalla, A. Chang, D. L. Smith, and A. W. Murray, 2001 Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159(2): 453-470.
7. Borner, G. V., N. Kleckner, and N. Hunter, 2004 Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117(1): 29-45.
8. Brisse, S., C. Pannier, A. Angoulvant, T. de Meeus, L. Diancourt et al., 2009 Uneven distribution of mating types among genotypes of Candida glabrata isolates from clinical samples. Eukaryot. Cell 8(3): 287-295.
9. Butler, G., M. D. Rasmussen, M. F. Lin, M. A. Santos, S. Sakthikumar et al., 2009 Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459(7247): 657-662.
10. Castrillon, D. H., P. Gonczy, S. Alexander, R. Rawson, C. G. Eberhart et al., 1993 Toward a molecular genetic analysis of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: characterization of malesterile mutants generated by single P element mutagenesis. Genetics 135(2): 489-505.
11. Charlesworth, B., 2009 Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10(3): 195-205.
12. Chen, L., K. Trujillo, W. Ramos, P. Sung, and A. E. Tomkinson, 2001 Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Mol. Cell 8(5): 1105-1115.
13. Clark, N. L., and C. F. Aquadro, 2010 A novel method to detect proteins evolving at correlated rates: identifying new functional relationships between coevolving proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27 (5): 1152-1161.
14. Clark, N. L., J. Gasper, M. Sekino, S. A. Springer, C. F. Aquadro et al., 2009 Coevolution of interacting fertilization proteins. PLoS Genet. 5(7): e1000570.
15. Clark, N. L., E. Alani, and C. F. Aquadro, 2012 Evolutionary rate covariation reveals shared functionality and coexpression of genes. Genome Res. 22(4): 714-720.
16. Coghlan, A., and K. H. Wolfe, 2000 Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16(12): 1131-1145.
17. Dodgson, A. R., C. Pujol, M. A. Pfaller, D. W. Denning, and D. R. Soll, 2005 Evidence for recombination in Candida glabrata. Fungal Genetics and Biology. FG & B 42(3): 233-243.
18. Drummond, D. A., J. D. Bloom, C. Adami, C. O. Wilke, and F. H. Arnold, 2005 Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(40): 14338-14343.
19. Drummond, D. A., A. Raval, and C. O. Wilke, 2006 A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23(2): 327-337.
20. Duret, L., and D. Mouchiroud, 2000 Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17(1): 68-74.
21. Eberhart, C. G., J. Z. Maines, and S. A. Wasserman, 1996 Meiotic cell cycle requirement for a fly homologue of human Deleted in Azoospermia. Nature 381(6585): 783-785.
22. Fitzpatrick, D. A., M. E. Logue, J. E. Stajich, and G. Butler, 2006 A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol. Biol. 6: 99.
23. Flores-Rozas, H., and R. D. Kolodner, 1998 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH3 gene functions in MSH3-dependent suppression of frameshift mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95(21): 12404-12409.
24. Fraser, H. B., A. E. Hirsh, D. P. Wall, and M. B. Eisen, 2004 Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(24): 9033-9038.
25. Goh, C. S., A. A. Bogan, M. Joachimiak, D. Walther, and F. E. Cohen, 2000 Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299(2): 283-293.
26. Hakes, L., S. C. Lovell, S. G. Oliver, and D. L. Robertson, 2007 Specificity in protein interactions and its relationship with sequence diversity and coevolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(19): 7999-8004.
27. Hoffmann, E. R., and R. H. Borts, 2004 Meiotic recombination intermediatesand mismatch repair proteins. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107(3-4): 232-248.
28. Hunter, N., 2007 Meiotic recombination, pp. 381-442 in Molecular Genetics of Recombination, edited by A. Aguilera, and R. Rothstein. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
29. Juan, D., F. Pazos, and A. Valencia, 2008 High-confidence prediction of global interactomes based on genome-wide coevolutionary networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(3): 934-939.
30. Kann, M. G., R. Jothi, P. F. Cherukuri, and T. M. Przytycka, 2007 Predicting protein domain interactions from coevolution of conserved regions. Proteins 67(4): 811-820.
31. Kann, M. G., B. A. Shoemaker, A. R. Panchenko, and T.M. Przytycka, 2009 Correlated evolution of interacting proteins: looking behind the mirrortree. J. Mol. Biol. 385(1): 91-98.
32. Kolas, N. K., A. Svetlanov, M. L. Lenzi, F. P. Macaluso, S. M. Lipkin et al., 2005 Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I. J. Cell Biol. 171(3): 447-458.
33. Kunkel, T. A., and D. A. Erie, 2005 DNA mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74: 681-710.
34. Kurtzman, C. P., 2003 Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora. FEMS Yeast Res. 4(3): 233-245.
35. Liti, G., D. M. Carter, A. M. Moses, J. Warringer, L. Parts et al., 2009 Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458(7236): 337-341.
36. Lovell, S. C., and D. L. Robertson, 2010 An integrated view of molecular coevolution in protein-protein interactions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27(11): 2567-2575.
37. Lynn, A., R. Soucek, and G. V. Borner, 2007 ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 15(5): 591-605.
38. Muller, H., C. Hennequin, J. Gallaud, B. Dujon, and C. Fairhead, 2008 The asexual yeast Candida glabrata maintains distinct a and alpha haploid mating types. Eukaryot. Cell 7(5): 848-858.
39. Murphy, W. J., P. A. Pevzner, and S. J. O'Brien, 2004 Mammalian phylogenomics comes of age. Trends Genet. 20(12): 631-639.
40. Nishant, K. T., A. J. Plys, and E. Alani, 2008 A mutation in the putative MLH3 endonuclease domain confers a defect in both mismatch repair and meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179(2): 747-755.
41. Obbard, D. J., K. H. Gordon, A. H. Buck, and F. M. Jiggins, 2009 The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364(1513): 99-115.
42. Pal, C., B. Papp, and L. D. Hurst, 2001 Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158(2): 927-931.
43. Papp, B., C. Pal, and L. D. Hurst, 2003 Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424(6945): 194-197.
44. Pazos, F., and A. Valencia, 2001 Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14(9): 609-614.
45. Pazos, F., J. A. Ranea, D. Juan, and M. J. Sternberg, 2005 Assessing protein co-evolution in the context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol. 352(4): 1002-1015.
46. Remm, M., C. E. Storm, and E. L. Sonnhammer, 2001 Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314(5): 1041-1052.
47. Ross-Macdonald, P., and G. S. Roeder, 1994 Mutation of a meiosisspecific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79(6): 1069-1080.
48. Santucci-Darmanin, S., D. Walpita, F. Lespinasse, C. Desnuelle, T. Ashley et al., 2000 MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. The FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 14(11): 1539-1547.
49. Santucci-Darmanin, S., S. Neyton, F. Lespinasse, A. Saunieres, P. Gaudray et al., 2002 The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11(15): 1697-1706.
50. Sato, T., Y. Yamanishi, M. Kanehisa, and H. Toh, 2005 The inference of protein-protein interactions by co-evolutionary analysis is improved by excluding the information about the phylogenetic relationships. Bioinformatics 21(17): 3482-3489.
51. Schacherer, J., J. A. Shapiro, D. M. Ruderfer, and L. Kruglyak, 2009 Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458(7236): 342-345.
52. Shapiro, B. J., and E. J. Alm, 2008 Comparing patterns of natural selection across species using selective signatures. PLoS Genet. 4 (2): e23.
53. Sharp, P. M., and W. H. Li, 1987 The codon adaptation index- a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15(3): 1281-1295.
54. Siomi, M. C., K. Sato, D. Pezic, and A. A. Aravin, 2011 PIWIinteracting small RNAs: the vanguard of genome defence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12(4): 246-258.
55. Snowden, T., S. Acharya, C. Butz, M. Berardini, and R. Fishel, 2004 HMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol. Cell 15(3): 437-451.
56. Sopko, R., S. Raithatha, and D. Stuart, 2002 Phosphorylation and maximal activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis-specific transcription factor Ndt80 is dependent on Ime2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22(20): 7024-7040.
57. Usui, T., T. Ohta, H. Oshiumi, J. Tomizawa, H. Ogawa et al., 1998 Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95(5): 705-716.
58. Veitia, R. A., S. Bottani, and J. A. Birchler, 2008 Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects. Trends in Genetics: TIG 24(8): 390-397.
59. Vermaak, D., S. Henikoff, and H. S. Malik, 2005 Positive selection drives the evolution of rhino, a member of the heterochromatin protein 1 family in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 1(1): 96-108.
60. Wang, T. F., N. Kleckner, and N. Hunter, 1999 Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (24): 13914-13919.
61. Whitby, M. C., 2005 Making crossovers during meiosis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33(Pt 6): 1451-1455.
62. Yang, Z., 2007 PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24(8): 1586-1591.
63. Zonneveld, B., and H. Steensma, 2003 Mating, sporulation and tetrad analysis in Kluyveromyces lactis, pp. 151-154 in Non- Conventional Yeasts in Genetics, Biochemistry, and Biotechnology: Practical Protocols, edited by K. Wolf, K. Breunig, and G. Barth. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.