Prediction of water flows in Colorado River, Argentina;Predicción de caudales en río Colorado, Argentina

Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 872-880

  Pierini, Jorge O ^a,b,c   Gómez, Eduardo A ^c,d   Telesca, Luciano ^e  

^a Universidad Provincial del Sudoeste   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^c Centro Científico y Tecnológico de Bahía Blanca   (Argentina)

^d UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLÓGICA NACIONAL   (Argentina)

^e CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Argentina; Autoregressive models; Colorado River; Flows; Neural networks; Prediction; Time series

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876262371     PISSN: None     EISSN: 0718560X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3856/vol40-issue4-fulltext-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmad, S. & S.P. Simonovic. 2005. An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters. J. Hydrol., 315: 236-251.
2. Al-Bayati, A., N.A. Sulaiman & G.W. Sadiq. 2009. A modified conjugate gradient formula for back propagation neural network algorithm. J. Comp. Sci., 5(11): 849-856.
3. Cigizoglu, H.K. 2008. Artificial neural networks In: water resources. Integration of information for environmental security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environ. Sec., (2): 115-148.
4. Cigizoglu, H.K. & O. Kisi. 2005. Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using kfold partitioning of neural network training data. Nordic Hydrol., 36(1): 1-16.
5. Coulibaly, P., F. Anctil & B. Bobee. 1999. Prevision hydrologique par reseaux de neurons artificiels: état de l'art. Can. J. Civil Eng., 26: 293-304.
6. Coulibaly, P., F. Anctil & B. Bobee. 2000. Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J. Hydrol., 230: 244-257.
7. Coulibaly, P., F. Anctil & B. Bobee. 2001a. Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(5): 367-376.
8. Coulibaly, P., B. Bobee & F. Anctil. 2001b. Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection. Hydrol. Process., 15: 1533-1536.
9. Cybenko, G. 1989. Approximation by superposition of a sigmoidal function. Math. Control Signal, 2: 303-314.
10. Dolling, O.R. & E. Varas. 2002. Artificial neural networks for streamflow prediction. J. Hydraul. Res., 40(5): 547-554.
11. Dong, X., C.M. Dohmen-Janssen, M. Booij & S. Hulscher. 2006. Effect of flow forecasting quality on benefits of reservoir operationa case study for the Geheyan reservoir (China). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3: 3771-3814.
12. Govindaraju, R.S. 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I. Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2): 115-123.
13. Gupta, H.V., K. Hsu & S. Sorooshian. 2000. Effective and efficient ANN modeling for streamflow forecast-ting. Chapter 1 of artificial neural networks. In: R.S. Govindaraju & A.R. Rao (eds.). Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 7-22.
14. Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe & H. White. 1989. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2: 359-366.
15. Hsu, K., H.V. Gupta & S. Sorooshian. 1995. Artificial neural network modelling of rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res., 31: 2517-2530.
16. Jain, S.K., D. Das & D.K. Srivastava. 1999. Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. J. Water Resour. Planning Manag., ASCE, 125: 263-271.
17. Karunanithi, N., W.J. Grenney, D. Whitley & K. Bovee. 1994. Neural networks for river flow prediction. J. Comp. Civil Eng., ASCE, 8(2): 201-220.
18. Kisi, O. 2004. River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 9(1): 60-63.
19. Kisi, O. & H.K.Cigizoglu. 2007. Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 24(3): 211-231.
20. Krzysztofowicz, R. 2001. The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J. Hydrol., 249: 2-9.
21. Krzysztofowicz, R.2002. Bayesian system for probabilistic river stage forecasting. J. Hydrol., 268: 16-40.
22. Larose, D.T. 2005. Discovering knowledge in data: an introduction to data mining. John Wiley & Sons, London, 240 pp.
23. Magoulas, G.D., M.N. Hrahatis & G.S. Androulakis. 1999. Improving the convergence of the back propagation algorithm using learning rate adaptation methods. Neural Comput., 11: 1769-1796.
24. Maier, H.R. & G.C. Dandy. 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ. Modell. Softw., 15: 101-124.
25. Muttiah, R.S., R. Srinivasan & P.M. Allen. 1997. Prediction of two-year peak stream discharges using neural networks. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 33: 625-630.
26. Negnevitsky, M. 2005. Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 440 pp.
27. Ochoa-Rivera, J.C., P. García-Bartual & J. Andreu. 2002. Multivariate synthetic streamflow generation using a hybrid model based on artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6(4): 641-654.
28. Othman, F. & M. Naseri. 2011. Reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural network. Int. J. Phys. Sci., 6(3): 434-440.
29. Rajukar, M.P., U.C. Kothyari & U.C. Chaube. 2004. Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 285(1-4): 96-113.
30. Roiger, J.R. & M.W. Geatz. 2003. Data mining: a tutorial-based primer, Addison-Wesely, Boston, 408 pp.
31. Rumelhart, D.E., G.E. Hinton & R.J. Williams. 1986. Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: D.E Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (eds.). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 318-362.
32. Saad, M., P. Bigras, A. Turgeon & R. Duquette. 1996. Fuzzy learning decomposition for the scheduling of hydroelectric power systems. Water Resour. Res., 32: 179-186.
33. Sivakumar, B., A.W. Jayawardena & T.M.K.G. Fernando. 2002. River flow forecasting: use of phase space reconstruction and artificial neural networks approaches. J. Hydrol., 265: 225-245.
34. Sudheer, K.P., I. Chaubey, V. Garg & K.W. Migliaccio. 2007. Impact of time-scale of the calibration objective function on the performance of watershed models. Hydrol. Proc., 21(25): 3409-3419.
35. Willmott, C.J. 1982. Some comments on evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 63(11): 1309-1369.
36. Yang, X. & C. Michel. 2000. Flood forecasting with a watershed model: a new method of parameter updating. Hydrol. Sci. J. Sci. Hydrol., 45(4): 537-546.
37. Zadeh, M.R., S. Amin, D. Khalili & V.P. Singh. 2010. Daily outflow prediction by multi-layer perceptron with logistic sigmoid and tangent sigmoid activation functions. Water Resour. Manag., 24(11): 2673-2688.
38. Zhang, G., B.E. Patuwo & M.Y. Hu. 1998. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int. J. Forecasting, 14(1): 35-62.