Erratum to Managing, Understanding, Applying, and Creating Knowledge in the Information Age: Next-Generation Challenges and Opportunities (Cognition and Instruction, 31, 2 (255-269), 10.1080/10824669.2013.773217);Managing, Understanding, Applying, and Creating Knowledge in the Information Age: Next-Generation Challenges and Opportunities

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 255-269

  Goldman, Susan R ^a   Scardamalia, Marlene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876230816     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2013.804768     Document Type: Erratum

References (68)

1. Achieve. 2013. Next generation science standards Retrieved fromhttp://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
2. Bazerman, C. 1985. Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2: 3-23.
3. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2003. "Learning to work creatively with knowledge". In Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions, Edited by: Corte, E. D., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N. and Merriënboer, J. V. 73-78. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
4. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2006. "Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction". In Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., Edited by: Alexander, P. A. and Winne, P. H. 695-713. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2010. Can children really create knowledge?. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1) Retrieved fromhttp://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/585
6. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2012. "Theory building and the pursuit of understanding in history, social studies, and literature". In Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes, Edited by: Kirby, J. R. and Lawson, M. J. 160-177. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2013. "Self-organization in conceptual growth: Practical implications". In International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.; pp. 504-519), Edited by: Vosniadou, S. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Braasch, J. L. G., Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Manning, F., Gomez, K. W. and MacLeod, S. 2009. Evaluating search results: An empirical analysis of middle school students' use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41: 63-82.
9. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F. and Braasch, J. L. G. 2013. "Documents as entities". In Reading-From words to multiple texts, Edited by: Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R. and Rouet, J.-F. 160-179. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
10. Chen, B., Scardamalia, M. and Resendes, M. Promisingness judgments by grade 3 and 4. Paper presented at the 16th Knowledge Building Summer Institute (KBSI2012), Toronto, Canada, August 2012,
11. Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., Resendes, M., Chuy, M. and Bereiter, C. 2012. "Students' intuitive understanding of promisingness and promisingness judgments to facilitate knowledge advancement". In The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012): Volume 1, Full Papers, Edited by: van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J. and Reimann, P. 111-118. Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
12. Chinn, C. A. and Brewer, W. F. 1998. An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35: 623-654.
13. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. The common core standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies and science and technical subjects, Washington, DC: National Governors Association for Best Practices. Retrieved fromhttp://www.corestandards.org
15. David, P. A. and Foray, D. 2003. Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. Policy Futures in Education, 1(1): 20-49.
16. Davis, E. A. and Krajcik, J. S. 2005. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3): 3-14.
17. Dunbar, K. 1997. "How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science". In Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change, Edited by: Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. and Vaid, S. 461-493. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Fischer, K. W. and Bidell, T. R. 1997. "Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought". In Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., Edited by: Lerner, R. M. and Damon, W. 467-561. New York, NY: Wiley.
19. Fujimura, J. 1992. "Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and translation". In Science as practice and culture, Edited by: Pickering, A. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (pp. 168-211)
20. G8 Summit. 2006. Education for innovative societies in the 21st century Retrieved fromhttp://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/g8/summit-sommet/2006/education
21. Goldman, S. R. 2004. "Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts". In Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research, Edited by: Shuart-Ferris, N. and Bloome, D. M. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. (pp. 313-347)
22. Goldman, S. R. 2005. "Designing for scalable educational improvement". In Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement, Edited by: Dede, C., Honan, J. P. and Peters, L. C. 67-96. San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass.
23. Goldman, S. R. 2012a. Adolescent literacy: Learning and understanding content. Future of Children, 22(2): 89-116.
24. Goldman, S. R. in press. "Reading and the web: Broadening the need for complex comprehension". In Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices, Edited by: Spiro, R. J., DeSchryver, M., Morsink, P., Hagerman, M. S. and Thompson, P. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Goldman, S. R., Bruitt, M. A., Brown, M., Greenleaf, C. and Lee, C. D. 2009. Reading for understanding across grades 6 through 12: Evidence-based argumentation for disciplinary learning Funded July, 2010 by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Grant # R305F100007
26. Goldman, S. R. and Bisanz, G. 2002. "Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes". In The psychology of science text comprehension, Edited by: Otero, J., León, J. A. and Graesser, A. C. 19-50. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Goldman, S. R. and Bloome, D. M. 2005. "Learning to construct and integrate". In Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festshrift in Honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer, Edited by: Healy, A. F. 169-182. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Goldman, S. R. and Rakestraw, J. A. 2000. "Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text". In Handbook of reading research, Edited by: Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D. and Barr, R. Vol. 3, 311-335. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A. and Manning, F. 2013. "Research and development of multiple source comprehension assessment". In Reading-From words to multiple texts, Edited by: Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R. and Rouet, J. F. 180-199. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
30. Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C. and Brodowinska, K. 2012b. Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4): 356-381. doi:10.1002/RRQ.027
31. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., Braasch, J. L., MacLeod, S. M. and Manning, F. H. 2010. "Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources". In Bringing reading to research life, Edited by: McKeown, M. G. and Kucan, L. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. (pp. 257-284)
32. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Pellegrino, J. W., Braasch, J. L.G., Manning, F. H. and Gomez, K. 2012c. "A technology for assessing multiple source comprehension: An essential skill of the 21st century". In Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills: Theoretical and practical implications from modern research, Edited by: Mayrath, M., Clarke-Midura, J. and Robinson, D. H. 171-207. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
33. Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C. K., Herman, J. and Schneider, S. A. 2010. Integrating literacy and science in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development. American Educational Research Journal, 20: 1-71. doi:10.3102/0002831210384839
34. Grice, H. P. 1975. "Logic and conversation". In Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts, Edited by: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. 121-133. New York, NY: Academic Press.
35. Homer-Dixon, T. 2000. The ingenuity gap: Facing the economic, environmental, and other challenges of an increasingly complex and unpredictable world, New York, NY: Knopf.
36. Homer-Dixon, T. 2006. The upside of down: Catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization., Washington, DC: Island Press.
37. Jucks, R. and Paus, E. this issue. Different words for the same concept: Learning collaboratively from multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction,
38. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39. Leu, D. J. Jr., Leu, D. D. and Coiro, J. 2004. Teaching with the internet: New literacies for new times (4th ed.), Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
40. Leu, D. J., McVerry, G., O'Byrne, I., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J. and Hartmann, D. K. 2009. "The new literacies of online reading comprehension and the irony of No Child Left Behind: Students who require our assistance the most, actually receive it the least". In Handbook of research on literacy and diversity, Edited by: Morrow, L. M., Rueda, R. and Lapp, D. 173-194. New York, NY: Guilford.
41. Liu, A. 2005. Transliteracies, an MRG proposal, Submitted to and funded by the University of California Office of the President for a University of California Multi-campus Research Group (MRG). Retrieved fromhttp://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/docs/transliteracies-mrg-proposal-abbrev.pdf, April 6
42. Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J., Britt, M. A. and Rouet, J.-F. issue). Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction,
43. Maier, J. and Richter, T. this issue. Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction,
44. Moje, E. B. 2008. Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2): 96-107.
45. Moje, E. B. and O'Brien, D. G. 2001. Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary classrooms, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2010. The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow, Paris, France: OECD.
47. Norris, S. P. and Phillips, L. M. 2003. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87: 224-240. doi:10.1002/sce.10066
48. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F. and Britt, M. A. 1999. "Towards a theory of documents representation". In The construction of mental representations during reading, Edited by: van Oostendorp, H. and Goldman, S. R. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (pp. 99-122).
49. Raphael, T., Au, K. and Goldman, S. R. 2009. "Whole school instructional improvement through the Standards Based Change Process: A developmental model". In Changing literacies for changing times, Edited by: Hoffman, J. and Goodman, Y. 198-229. New York, NY: Routledge/ Taylor Francis Group.
50. Resendes, M., Chen, B., Chuy, M. and Scardamalia, M. The effect of meta-discourse on ways of contributing to an explanation-seeking dialogue in grade 2. Paper presented at the 16th Knowledge Building Summer Institute (KBSI2012), Toronto, Canada, August 2012,
51. Rouet, J.-F. 2006. The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Rouet, J.-F. and Britt, M. A. 2011. "Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension". In Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning, Edited by: McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P. and Shraw, G. 19-52. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
53. Scardamalia, M. 2002. "Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge". In Liberal education in a knowledge society, Edited by: Smith, B. 76-98. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
54. Scardamalia, M. 2004. "CSILE/Knowledge Forum®". In Education and technology: An encyclopedia, Edited by: Kovalchick, A. and Dawson, K. 183-192. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
55. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1987. "). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition". In Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning, Edited by: Rosenberg, S. 142-175. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1992. "An architecture for collaborative knowledge-building". In Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (NATO-ASI Series F.: Computer and Systems Sciences, Edited by: Corte, De, Linn, M., Mandl, H. and Verschaffel, L. 41-46. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
57. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 2006. "Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology". In Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Edited by: Sawyer, K. 97-118. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58. Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C. 2008. Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1): 40-59.
59. Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B. and Bromme, R. this issue. Dealing with uncertainty: Readers' memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction,
60. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A. and Ferguson, L. this issue. Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction,
61. Thomas, S., Joseph, C., Laccetti, J., Mason, B., Mills, S., Perril, S. and Pullinger, K. 2007. Transliteracy: Crossing divides. First Monday, 12(12) Retrieved fromhttp://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2060/1908
62. von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I. and Nishiguchi, T. 1999. Knowledge creation: A source of value, London, UK: Macmillan.
63. Wiley, J. and Voss, J. F. 1996. The effects of "playing historian" on learning in history. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10: 63-72.
64. Wiley, J. and Voss, J. F. 1999. Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91: 301-311.
65. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K. and Hemmerich, J. A. 2009. Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46: 1060-1106.
66. Wineburg, S. S. 1991. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 73-87.
67. Wineburg, S. S. 1998. Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22: 319-346.
68. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R. and Messina, R. 2009. Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18: 7-44.