Displacement of location in illusory line motion

Psychological Research

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 260-276

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a   Ruppel, Susan E ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876181652     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0428-x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Bartley, S. H., & Wilkinson, F. R. (1953). Some factors in the production of gamma movement. Journal of Psychology, 36, 201-206.
3. Bavelier, D., Schneider, K. A., & Monacelli, A. (2002). Reflexive gaze orienting induces the line-motion illusion. Vision Research, 42, 2817-2827.
4. Bryant, D. J., & Subbiah, I. (1994). Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 119-139.
5. Crawford, T. J., Kean, M., Klein, R. M., & Hamm, J. P. (2006). The effects of illusory line motion on incongruent saccades: Implications for saccadic eye movements and visual attention. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 498-506.
6. Downing, P. E., & Treisman, A. M. (1997). The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 768-779.
7. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2003). The line-motion illusion can be reversed by motion signals after the line disappears. Perception, 32, 963-968.
8. Erlhagen, W., & Jancke, D. (2004). The role of action plans and other cognitive factors in motion extrapolation: A modeling study. Visual Cognition, 11, 315-340.
9. Fuller, S., & Carrasco, M. (2009). Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: The case of the line motion illusion. Journal of Vision, 9(13), 1-17.
10. Hamm, J. P., & Klein, R. M. (2002). Does attention follow the motion in the "shooting line" illusion? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 279-291.
11. Harrower, M. R. (1929). Some experiments on the nature of gamma movement. Psychologische Forschung, 13, 55-63.
12. Hayes, A. E., & Freyd, J. J. (2002). Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition, 9, 8-27.
13. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219-1240.
14. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993b). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detection as motion sensation. Perception, 22, 517-526.
15. Hubbard, T. L. (1993). The effects of context on visual representational momentum. Memory & Cognition, 21, 103-114.
16. Hubbard, T. L. (1994). Judged displacement: A modular process? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 359-373.
17. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
18. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
19. Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Computational theory and cognition in representational momentum and related types of displacement: A reply to Kerzel. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 174-177.
20. Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum contributes to motion induced mislocalization of stationary objects. Visual Cognition, 16, 44-67.
21. Hubbard, T. L., Blessum, J. A., & Ruppel, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) "Launching Effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 294-301.
22. Hubbard, T. L., & Courtney, J. R. (2008). The onset repulsion effect and motion induced mislocalization of a stationary object. Perception, 37, 1386-1398.
23. Hubbard, T. L., Kumar, A. M., & Carp, C. L. (2009). Effects of spatial cueing on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 666-677.
24. Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich effect or an onset repulsion effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 961-979.
25. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (1999). Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 242-256.
26. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naive impetus in Michotte's "Launching Effect:" Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176.
27. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2011a). The effect of spatial cuing on the onset repulsion effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2236-2248.
28. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2011b). Effects of temporal and spatial separation on velocity and strength of illusory line motion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1133-1146.
29. Hubbard, T. L., Ruppel, S. E., & Courtney, J. R. (2005). The force of appearance: Gamma movement, naive impetus, and representational momentum. Psicologica, 26, 209-228.
30. Jancke, D., Chavane, F., Naaman, S., & Grinvald, A. (2004). Imaging correlates of illusion in early visual cortex. Nature, 428, 423-426.
31. Jancke, D., & Erlhagen, W. (2010). Bridging the gap: A model of common neural mechanisms underlying the Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and the representational momentum effect. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and time in perception and action (pp. 422-440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kawahara, J., & Yokosawa, K. (2001). Preattentive perception of multiple illusory line-motion: A formal model of parallel independent-detection in visual search. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 357-383.
33. Kawahara, J., Yokosawa, K., Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1996). Illusory line motion in visual search: Attentional facilitation or apparent motion. Perception, 25, 901-920.
34. Kerzel, D. (2002a). Attention shifts and memory averaging. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 425-443.
35. Kerzel, D. (2002b). Memory for the position of stationary objects: Disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research, 42, 159-167.
36. Kerzel, D. (2003). Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research, 43, 2623-2635.
37. Kerzel, D. (2006). Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "Representational Momentum". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 166-173.
38. Kerzel, D. (2010). The Fröhlich effect: Past and present. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and time in perception and action (pp. 321-337). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2004). Spatial distortions and processing latencies in the onset repulsion and Fröhlich effects. Vision Research, 44, 577-590.
40. Munger, M. P., & Minchew, J. H. (2002). Parallels between remembering and predicting an object's location. Visual Cognition, 9, 177-194.
41. Müsseler, J., & Kerzel, D. (2004). The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: Reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects. Vision Research, 44, 2201-2206.
42. Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 120-138.
43. Müsseler, J., van der Heijden, A. H. C., Mahmud, S. H., Deubel, H., & Ertsey, S. (1999). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1646-1661.
44. Nagai, M., & Saiki, J. (2005). Illusory motion and representational momentum. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 855-866.
45. Nelson, T. O., & Chaiklin, S. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 529-545.
46. Postma, A., Huntjens, R. J. C., Meuwissen, M., & Laeng, B. (2006). The time course of spatial memory processing in the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1914-1918.
47. Scharlau, I., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Perceptual latency priming and illusory line motion: Facilitation by gradients of attention? Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 87-97.
48. Schmidt, W. (2000). Endogenous attention and illusory line motion reexamined. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 980-996.
49. Shimojo, S., Hikosaka, O., & Miyauchi, S. (1999). Automatic and controlled attention detected by the line motion effect. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 145-163). Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Steinman, B. A., Steinman, S. B., & Lehmkuhle, S. (1995). Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research, 35, 1859-1869.
51. Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision, 15, 219-243.
52. van der Ham, I. J. M., van Wezel, R. J. A., Oleksiak, A., & Postma, A. (2007). The time course of hemisphere differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2492-2498.
53. von Grünau, M., Dube, S., & Kwas, M. (1996). Two contributions to motion induction: A preattentive effect and facilitation due to attentional capture. Vision Research, 36, 2447-2457.
54. von Grünau, M., & Faubert, J. (1994). Intraattribute and interattribute motion induction. Perception, 23, 913-928.
55. Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Visual Cognition, 9, 139-152.
56. Winters, J. J. (1964). Gamma movement: Apparent movement in figural aftereffects experiments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 819-822.